Adjuvant Atezolizumab in Patients with Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of IMmotion010.

Patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) have a poor prognosis. In the randomised, double-blind phase 3 IMmotion010 trial (NCT03024996), adjuvant atezolizumab did not demonstrate a disease-free survival (DFS) benefit versus placebo in the overall population of patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence following surgery. This prespecified subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety was completed in 104 patients with sRCC. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. At a median follow-up of 45 mo, the median DFS was not evaluable (NE; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12 mo-NE) in the atezolizumab arm (n = 37) and 23 mo (95% CI, 11-NE) in the placebo arm (n = 66; hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI, 0.44-1.4]). In the sRCC subgroup, grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in one patient (2.7%) in the atezolizumab arm and two patients (3.0%) in the placebo arm. By comparison, 54 of 353 patients (15%) and 16 of 317 patients (5.0%) with non-sarcomatoid histology reported grade 3/4 TRAEs in the respective arms. In conclusion, the difference in DFS was not statistically significant between adjuvant atezolizumab and placebo in patients with sRCC. The safety profile was similar between patients with sRCC and non-sRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with a specific type of locoregional kidney cancer (tumours with sarcomatoid features) were treated with atezolizumab or placebo after surgery. Slightly more patients treated with atezolizumab lived longer without the disease getting worse than those treated with placebo, although this finding was not statistically significant. The side effects were similar to those seen in patients with other types of kidney cancer treated with atezolizumab in the same study (IMmotion010). In patients with sarcomatoid kidney cancer, atezolizumab was tolerable and may be more effective than placebo, but this requires further study.

Anxiety, Depression, and Coping Strategies during Chemotherapy Treatment: A Comparison of Older and Younger Adults with Advanced Cancer in Brazil.

We sought to examine differences in anxiety, depression and coping strategies among younger (<64-year old) and older (≥65-year old) patients. Patients were assessed at baseline (T1), mid-point (T2) and on the last day of treatment (T3) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Ways of Coping. A linear mixed modeling approach was used. The study included 200 patients (gender: 70% women; diagnosis: 30% breast, 22% hematological, 18% gastrointestinal; disease stage: 60% advanced). Older patients who used an emotion-focused coping strategy had a greater decrease in anxiety at T3 compared to those that used problem-focused coping (p = .002).

Atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib monotherapy for patients with renal cell carcinoma after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (CONTACT-03): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, yet optimised treatment of patients whose disease progresses after these therapies is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether adding atezolizumab to cabozantinib delayed disease progression and prolonged survival in patients with disease progression on or after previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. METHODS: CONTACT-03 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, done in 135 study sites in 15 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma whose disease had progressed with immune checkpoint inhibitors were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cabozantinib (60 mg orally once daily) or cabozantinib alone. Randomisation was done through an interactive voice-response or web-response system in permuted blocks (block size four) and stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk group, line of previous immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and renal cell carcinoma histology. The two primary endpoints were progression-free survival per blinded independent central review and overall survival. The primary endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04338269, and is closed to further accrual. FINDINGS: From July 28, 2020, to Dec 27, 2021, 692 patients were screened for eligibility, 522 of whom were assigned to receive atezolizumab-cabozantinib (263 patients) or cabozantinib (259 patients). 401 (77%) patients were male and 121 (23%) patients were female. At data cutoff (Jan 3, 2023), median follow-up was 15·2 months (IQR 10·7-19·3). 171 (65%) patients receiving atezolizumab-cabozantinib and 166 (64%) patients receiving cabozantinib had disease progression per central review or died. Median progression-free survival was 10·6 months (95% CI 9·8-12·3) with atezolizumab-cabozantinib and 10·8 months (10·0-12·5) with cabozantinib (hazard ratio [HR] for disease progression or death 1·03 [95% CI 0·83-1·28]; p=0·78). 89 (34%) patients in the atezolizumab-cabozantinib group and 87 (34%) in the cabozantinib group died. Median overall survival was 25·7 months (95% CI 21·5-not evaluable) with atezolizumab-cabozantinib and was not evaluable (21·1-not evaluable) with cabozantinib (HR for death 0·94 [95% CI 0·70-1·27]; p=0·69). Serious adverse events occurred in 126 (48%) of 262 patients treated with atezolizumab-cabozantinib and 84 (33%) of 256 patients treated with cabozantinib; adverse events leading to death occurred in 17 (6%) patients in the atezolizumab-cabozantinib group and nine (4%) in the cabozantinib group. INTERPRETATION: The addition of atezolizumab to cabozantinib did not improve clinical outcomes and led to increased toxicity. These results should discourage sequential use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with renal cell carcinoma outside of clinical trials. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Exelixis.

Difficulties in Defining Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Implications for Clinical Trial Accrual and Community Practice Adoption of Metastasis-Directed Therapy Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis-directed therapy is widely utilized for oligometastatic prostate cancer patients, but standard imaging does not always identify metastases definitively and, even with PSMA PET, there may be equivocal findings. Not all clinicians have access to detailed imaging review, particularly outside of academic cancer centers, and PET scan access is also limited. We sought to understand how imaging interpretation impacted recruitment to a clinical trial for oligometastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained to review medical records from all patients screened for the institutional IRB-approved clinical trial for men with oligometastatic prostate cancer involving androgen deprivation plus stereotactic radiation to all metastatic sites, as well as radium223 (NCT03361735). Clinical trial inclusion required at least one bone metastatic lesion and no more than five total sites of metastasis, including soft tissue sites. Tumor board discussion records were reviewed, along with results from additional radiology studies ordered or confirmatory biopsies performed. Clinical characteristics such as PSA level and Gleason score were studied for association with likelihood of oligometastatic disease confirmation. RESULTS: At the time of data analysis, 18 subjects were deemed eligible and 20 were not eligible. The most common reasons for ineligibility were no confirmed bone metastasis in 16 patients (59%) and too many metastatic sites in 3 (11%). The median PSA of eligible subjects was 3.28 (range 0.4-45.5), whereas the median PSA of those found to be ineligible was 10.45 (range 3.7-26.3) when there were too many metastases identified, and 2.7 (range 0.2-34.5) when metastases were unconfirmed. PET imaging (PSMA or fluciclovine PET) increased the number of metastases, while MRI resulted in downstaging to non-metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that additional imaging (i.e., at least two independent imaging modalities of a possible metastatic lesion) or tumor board adjudication of imaging findings may be critical to correctly identify patients appropriate for enrollment in oligometastatic protocols. This should be considered as trials of metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer accrue and results are translated to broader oncology practice.

The Gut Microbiome and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The introduction of targeted therapy (TT) and immuno-oncology (IO) agents have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, despite the significant improvements in survival and clinical response yielded by these agents, a significant percentage of patients still experience progressive disease. Evidence now suggests that microorganisms living in the gut (i.e., the gut microbiome) could be used as a biomarker for response and may also have utility in increasing response to these treatments. In this review, we present an overview of the role of the gut microbiome in cancer and its potential implications in the treatment of mRCC.

Adjuvant atezolizumab versus placebo for patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence following resection (IMmotion010): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for locoregional renal cell carcinoma is surgery, but many patients experience recurrence. The objective of the current study was to determine if adjuvant atezolizumab (vs placebo) delayed recurrence in patients with an increased risk of recurrence after resection. METHODS: IMmotion010 is a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial conducted in 215 centres in 28 countries. Eligible patients were patients aged 18 years or older with renal cell carcinoma with a clear cell or sarcomatoid component and increased risk of recurrence. After nephrectomy with or without metastasectomy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive atezolizumab (1200 mg) or placebo (both intravenous) once every 3 weeks for 16 cycles or 1 year. Randomisation was done with an interactive voice-web response system. Stratification factors were disease stage (T2 or T3a vs T3b-c or T4 or N+ vs M1 no evidence of disease), geographical region (north America [excluding Mexico] vs rest of the world), and PD-L1 status on tumour-infiltrating immune cells (<1% vs ≥1% expression). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were randomised, regardless of whether study treatment was received. The safety-evaluable population included all patients randomly assigned to treatment who received any amount of study drug (ie, atezolizumab or placebo), regardless of whether a full or partial dose was received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03024996, and is closed to further accrual. FINDINGS: Between Jan 3, 2017, and Feb 15, 2019, 778 patients were enrolled; 390 (50%) were assigned to the atezolizumab group and 388 (50%) to the placebo group. At data cutoff (May 3, 2022), the median follow-up duration was 44·7 months (IQR 39·1-51·0). Median investigator-assessed disease-free survival was 57·2 months (95% CI 44·6 to not evaluable) with atezolizumab and 49·5 months (47·4 to not evaluable) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·75-1·15, p=0·50). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (seven [2%] patients who received atezolizumab vs 15 [4%] patients who received placebo), hyperglycaemia (ten [3%] vs six [2%]), and diarrhoea (two [1%] vs seven [2%]). 69 (18%) patients who received atezolizumab and 46 (12%) patients who received placebo had a serious adverse event. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy after resection for patients with renal cell carcinoma with increased risk of recurrence showed no evidence of improved clinical outcomes versus placebo. These study results do not support adjuvant atezolizumab for treatment of renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech, a member of the Roche group.

Emotional problem-related distress screening and its prevalence by cancer type: Assessment by patients' characteristics and level of assistance requested.

OBJECTIVE: Emotional problem-related distress is a common issue faced by patients with cancer. However, patients suffering with this emotional burden do not typically seek assistance. This study sought to determine the prevalence of emotional problem-related distress by cancer type, and identify factors correlated with the level of assistance requested. METHODS: Using the SupportScreen®, patients were screened for emotional problem-related distress at their first or second visit to an NCI designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. General Linear Model was used to test the association between emotional problem-related distress and type of cancer, and the relationship between level of assistance requested and patients' characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 2,421 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were mostly female (62%), diagnosed with breast (24%), gynecological (16%) or gastrointestinal (15%) cancers. Highest levels of emotional problem-related distress were reported by patients diagnosed with lung, gynecological, breast and gastrointestinal cancers. Level of assistance requested were significantly associated with problem-related distress scores (p < 0.001), which were higher among patients with lower household incomes (p < 0.001) and Spanish as primary language (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study found an association between Level of assistance requested and emotional problem-related distress, which were heightened by lower income and Spanish-speaking. Intervention strategies should be considered to increase access to psychosocial support services.

A first-in-human phase I study of TAS0728, an oral covalent binding inhibitor of HER2, in patients with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 aberrations.

TAS0728 is an oral covalent binding inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). A first-in-human open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study (NCT03410927) was initiated to investigate the safety and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose of TAS0728 in adults with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 overexpression, amplification or mutation. In total, 19 patients received TAS0728 at escalating doses from 50 to 200 mg BID for 21-day cycles. Following escalation of the dose to 200 mg BID, a total of two DLTs were observed, both cases of Grade 3 diarrhea (lasting >48 h and not responsive to aggressive antidiarrheal treatment). Following de-escalation of the dose to 150 mg BID, another DLT of Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in one patient. Additionally, at 150 mg BID, one patient had a fatal cardiac arrest after receiving 1 cycle (21 days) of TAS0728. The etiology of the cardiac arrest event was not clear, however causal relationship to TAS0728 could not be excluded due to the temporal association observed. Partial responses were observed in 2 of 14 patients evaluable for TAS0728 treatment response. The study was stopped due to unacceptable toxicity during the dose-escalation as the overall risk-benefit ratio no longer favored the dose level being tested, therefore the MTD was not determined. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03410927 ; registered on January 25, 2018.

Counterbalancing COVID-19 with Cancer Surveillance and Therapy: A Survey of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While providers are challenged with treatment decisions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, decision making ultimately falls in the hands of patients-at present, their perspective is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients' perspectives on COVID-19 and understand the associated implications for treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An online survey of RCC patients was conducted from March 22 to March 25, 2020, disseminated through social media and patient networking platforms. The survey comprised 45 items, including baseline demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment-related information. Patients were additionally queried regarding their anxiety level related to COVID-19 and associated implications for their cancer diagnosis. INTERVENTION: An online survey study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics with graphical outputs were used to characterize survey results. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 539 patients (male:female 39%:58%) from 14 countries responded. Of them, 71% felt that their risk of COVID-19 infection was higher than the general population, and 27% contacted their physician to establish this. Among patients with localized disease (40%), most (42%) had scheduled surveillance scans within 6 wk-65% were unwilling to delay scans. Among patients with metastatic disease, 76% were receiving active therapy. While most patients preferred not to defer therapy (51%), patients receiving immune therapy regimens were less amenable to deferring therapy than those receiving targeted treatment (20% vs 47%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite high levels of anxiety surrounding COVID-19, many patients with RCC were inclined to adhere to existing schedules of surveillance (localized disease) and systemic treatment (metastatic disease). PATIENT SUMMARY: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted many doctors to develop different treatment strategies for cancer and other chronic conditions. Given the importance of the patient voice in these strategies, we conducted a survey of patients with kidney cancer to determine their treatment preferences. Our survey highlighted that most patients prefer to continue their current strategies of kidney cancer treatment and monitoring.

COVID-19 and financial toxicity in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To ascertain renal cell carcinoma (RCC) financial toxicity on COVID-19 during the COVID-19 crisis as patients are struggling with therapeutic and financial implications. METHODS: An online survey was conducted from March 22 to March 25, 2020. It included baseline demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment-related information, anxiety levels related to COVID-19, questions related to financial concerns about COVID-19 as well as the validated 11-item COST measure. RESULTS: Five-hundred-and-thirty-nine patients (39%:58% male:female) from 14 countries responded. 23% of the patients did not feel in control of their financial situation but 8% reported being very satisfied with their finances. The median COST score was 21.5 (range 1-44). Metastatic patients who have not started systemic therapy had a COST score (19.8 range 2-41) versus patients on oral systemic therapy had a COST score (23.9 range 4-44). Patients in follow-up after surgery had a median COST score at 20.8 (range 1-40). A low COST scores correlated (p < 0.001) were female gender (r = 0.108), younger age (r = 0.210), urban living situation (r = 0.68), a lower educational level (r = 0.155), lower income (r = 0.165), higher anxiety about acquiring COVID-19 (r = 0.198), having metastatic disease (r = 0.073) and a higher distress score about cancer progression (r = 0.224). CONCLUSION: Our data highlight severe financial impact of COVID-19. Acknowledging financial hardship and thorough counseling of cancer patients should be part of the conversation during the pandemic. Treatment and surveillance of RCC patients might have to be adjusted to contemplate financial and medical needs.

Discrepancies between genitourinary cancer patients' and clinicians' characterization of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes have been used to assess treatment effectiveness and actively engage patients in their disease management. This study was designed to describe the patient-reported performance status (PS) and the provider-reported PS. METHODS: Patients with metastatic genitourinary cancers were recruited from a single cancer center before the initiation of a new line of treatment. PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General), and distress (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety and Depression) were self-reported by patients. Clinical data (eg, age, sex, diagnosis, and physician-reported ECOG PS) were extracted from medical records. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the association between PS, quality of life, and psychological symptoms. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were enrolled (76.6% male, 70.3% White, 81.4% married, and 76.6% well educated). The median age was 67 years; 66.9% were diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma, 20.0% were diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma, and 13.1% were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Clinicians more frequently classified patients' ECOG PS as 0 in comparison with the patients themselves (92.4% vs 64.1%; P = .001). Higher clinician-reported ECOG PS was associated with poorer physical and functional well-being and higher rates of depression (P < .01), whereas higher patient-reported ECOG PS was associated with worse psychosocial outcomes (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies were noted between the patient- and provider-reported ECOG PS, with clinicians overestimating the ECOG PS in comparison with the patients themselves. This study's findings suggest that patients incorporate their social and emotional well-being into their PS score in addition to their physical well-being. This information is not immediately accessible to most clinicians from just a standard patient interview and likely accounts for the overestimation of the patients' ECOG PS by the clinicians.

Exceptional Response to Everolimus in a Patient with Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a PTEN Inactivating Mutation.

Prostate cancer is among the most common types of cancer in men. Early detection and proper medical intervention is crucial to ensuring successful treatment. Here we describe a patient clinically presenting with castrate-resistant prostate carcinoma. Comprehensive genomic profiling identified a PTEN inactivating mutation in the patient's tumor. After being heavily pretreated, the patient showed stable disease on everolimus, a PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibitor.

Advancing the Science and Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Bridging the Divide between Academic and Community Practices.

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has rapidly evolved; however, the progress made in the field is heavily contingent upon timely and efficient accrual to clinical trials. While a substantial proportion of accrual occurs at tertiary care centers, community sites are playing an increasing role in patient recruitment. In this article, we discuss strategies to optimize collaborations between academic and community sites to facilitate clinical research. Further, as the role of biomarker discovery has become increasingly important in tailoring therapy, we will discuss opportunities to bridge diverse accrual sites for the purpose of translational research.

Physical activity and risk of bladder cancer among postmenopausal women.

Physical activity is associated with decreased risk for many cancers. Studies on the association between physical activity and risk of bladder cancer are limited, and findings are inconsistent. Postmenopausal women (mean age = 63.3) were recruited into the Women's Health Initiative from 1993 to 1998. Self-reported baseline information on physical activity and other covariates were available in 141 288 participants. Incident bladder cancer cases were collected through 2018 and centrally adjudicated. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined by Cox proportional hazard regression models. Effect modification due to smoking was assessed. During an average of 18.5 years of follow-up, 817 bladder cancer cases were identified. Compared to physically inactive women, those who engaged in ≥15 MET-hours/week of total physical activity, ≥8.75 MET-hours/week of walking or ≥11.25 MET-hours/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity had lower risk of bladder cancer (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.94, P for linear trend = .02; HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98, P for linear trend = .03; and HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94, P for linear trend = .02, respectively). No effect modification was found by smoking status (P for interaction = .06, 0.91 and 0.27, respectively). We found that total physical activity, walking and moderate to vigorous physical activity were inversely associated with bladder cancer incidence among postmenopausal women in a dose-response manner. Physical activity may play a potential role in the primary prevention of bladder cancer. Further studies with objective measurements of physical activity are needed to confirm these findings.

Unfavorable Cancer-specific Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer and Squamous Cell Variant: A Multi-institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: Nonurothelial carcinoma (UC) malignancies have traditionally been considered to have a more aggressive clinical course, and little is known about their response to neoadjuvant therapy. We examined the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on a large population of patients with bladder cancer (BCa) with different histologic variants (HVs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We relied on a retrospective, multicenter database of 2858 patients with BCa who had undergone radical cystectomy with or without NAC from 1990 to 2017. Pure and mixed HVs were grouped into 6 categories: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; n = 283; 45%), other subtypes (n = 95; 15%), micropapillary (n = 85; 14%), adenocarcinoma (n = 65; 10%), small cell (n = 54; 8.6%), and sarcomatous (n = 47; 7.6%). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to examine cancer-specific survival (CSS) according to the HV, using pure UC as the reference. Logistic regression models were used to examine the odds of clinical-to-pathologic downstaging after NAC according to the HV. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 2229 cases of pure UC and 629 cases of BCa with HVs at radical cystectomy. Of the 450 NAC-treated patients, only those patients with SCC (n = 44; 9.8%) had had worse CSS (median CSS, 33 vs. 116 months; P < .001) and higher mortality rates (hazard ratio, 2.1; P = .03) compared with those with pure UC (n = 328; 72.9%). The results of the analyses were also confirmed when the pure and mixed cases were considered separately. After adjusting for NAC, only SCC showed a lower rate of clinical-to-pathologic downstaging (odds ratio, 0.4; P = .03) compared with UC. CONCLUSIONS: SCC was the HV exhibiting the lowest effect of NAC in terms of activity and CSS. Compared with pure UC, SCC seemed to be insensitive to traditional NAC regimens.

Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Metastatic Urinary Cancers.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have widely been used to assess treatment-related symptoms in clinical trials and provide insight into the patients' perspective during treatment. This mini-review sought to outline the benefits of measuring patient-reported outcomes, describe the most common measures used in recent pivotal studies in metastatic urinary cancers, and summarize the main findings published in the last 2 yr. In general, European Organization for Research and Treatment Cancer QLQC30 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy were the most common PROMs used in these trials. PROMs provided important information concerning patients' quality of life and symptom burden during treatment, including insight into how these drugs may be tolerated in real-world clinical circumstances; however, many still do not assess patients' social and emotional experiences. Based on this mini-review, the combination of a symptomatic toxicity scale and validated quality of life measure represents a reliable strategy to assess patient perspectives during treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this mini-review on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), we explored data from recent pivotal studies in metastatic urinary cancer. We found that all recent clinical trials in metastatic urinary cancers assessed patient-reported outcomes, primarily through the use of quality of life measures. We recommend the use of both a symptomatic toxicity scale and a quality of life scale to evaluate PROMs.

Association between chemotherapy toxicity risk scores and physical symptoms among older Brazilian adults with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Utilizing the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) chemotherapy toxicity risk score before starting treatment in older adults with cancer is guideline-recommended. However, this has not been tested in most developing countries. We investigated the use of a Portuguese version of the CARG score, including the association between this score and physical symptoms, among older Brazilian adults with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients aged ≥65 starting chemotherapy at a public Brazilian hospital. A Portuguese version of the CARG tool was created and linguistically validated. Patients were assessed for chemotherapy toxicity risk using the CARG score, and physical symptoms were evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General (FACT-G) scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify physical symptoms associated with high CARG scores, including pain, nausea, and fatigue. RESULTS: Older patients (65+) with cancer were enrolled (n = 117). Patients were mostly female (57.3%), white (52.1%), married (52.1%), and had less than high school education (75.2%). Breast, gastrointestinal and lung cancers were the most common diagnosis, and 66.7% had metastatic disease. Elevated pain scores (P < .01) were associated with higher chemotherapy toxicity risk scores, even after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: We created and implemented a Portuguese language version of the CARG tool. We found that, although physical symptoms are not included in the CARG model, elevated pain was strongly associated with having a high CARG score. As a modifiable risk factor, pain should be addressed among older patients with cancer considering chemotherapy, to help mitigate their risks for toxicity.

Distress and Quality of Life Among Patients with Advanced Genitourinary Cancers.

Patients with advanced genitourinary cancers face many challenges throughout their disease trajectory, and many will experience clinically relevant psychosocial distress. Certain groups, including female gender, younger age (and older age for suicide), unmarried status, and non-clear cell histology, remain at a higher risk, and evidence suggests that those with kidney and bladder cancers may be at an increased risk of suicide. Routine psychosocial screening, with brief validated tools, has the ability to identify patients' unmet needs, assist the health care team in addressing such symptoms, and subsequently improve quality of life, adherence, and clinical outcomes. Effective supportive care modalities are available that address common patient needs in the context of incurable disease (eg, emotional and physical symptoms); however, challenges remain in terms of patient acceptance and access through insurance coverage. As a result, remote home-based interventions have emerged with the potential to mitigate emotional symptom burden and improve disease adjustment. In this study, we highlight studies reporting on the prevalence of psychosocial distress and associated risk factors in advanced genitourinary cancers, and review evidence-based interventions for the management of distress, including distress screening and psychosocial interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: This mini-review reports the prevalence of psychosocial distress and associated risk factors among patients with advanced kidney, bladder, or prostate cancer. We found that patients with these types of advanced genitourinary cancers are at a great risk of distress, including suicide, with consequent impairments in quality of life. We recommend that a distress screening program be incorporated as the standard of care and that referrals to appropriate psychosocial interventions be available to assist patients in greatest need.