Pulmonary Rehabilitation Only Versus With Nutritional Supplementation in Patients With Bronchiectasis: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended for bronchiectasis, but there is little evidence of its efficacy in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of PR in normally nourished patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis compared with the effect of PR plus an oral nutritional supplement (PRONS). METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design in which participants were randomly assigned to receive PR for 12 wk or PR plus a high-protein nutritional supplement enriched with beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate. Outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 12 and 24 wk including cardiopulmonary exercise testing, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), bronchorrhea, dyspnea, psychological symptoms, spirometry, and exacerbations. RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized into 2 groups of 15 participants. In both groups, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, HRQOL, dyspnea, and spirometry parameters significantly increased from baseline at 3 and/or 6 mo. CONCLUSION: PR improved exercise capacity, HRQOL, and respiratory parameters. The use of PRONS did not have a significant effect on the results.

Body Composition Measurement in Bronchiectasis: Comparison between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Skinfold Thickness Measurement, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry before and after Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: In individuals with bronchiectasis, fat-free mass depletion may be common despite a low prevalence of underweight and is considered a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality. Techniques to adequately estimate fat-free mass and its changes over time are needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess agreement among values obtained with three different body composition techniques: skinfold thickness measurement (STM), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DESIGN: The study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: A respiratory rehabilitation program was administered for 3 months to individuals with bronchiectasis from the bronchiectasis unit of the Regional University Hospital in Malaga, Spain, from September 2013 to September 2014. Individuals with a body mass index (calculated as kg/m2) >18.5 who were aged 65 years or younger and those with a body mass index >20 who were older than 65 years were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At baseline and at 3 and 6 months, body composition was determined by DXA and STM. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Statistical concordance was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa coefficient, and the degree of agreement using the Bland Altman method. For comparison of the quantitative variables at baseline vs at 3 months and 6 months, the paired sample t test (or the Wilcoxon test) was used. RESULTS: Thirty participants were included. Strong agreement was observed between body composition values determined by BIA and DXA in fat mass (ICC: 0.92) and fat-free mass (ICC: 0.87). Strong agreement was observed between STM and DXA in the values for fat-free mass (ICC: 0.91) and fat mass (ICC: 0.94), and lower agreement was observed for the longitudinal data and in the regional values. The mean difference between fat-free mass determined by BIA and DXA was + 4.7 with a standard deviation of 2.4 kg in favor of BIA. The mean difference between fat-free mass determined by STM and DXA was +2.3 with a standard deviation of 2.7 kg in favor of STM. Six individuals were classified as having a low fat-free mass index (20%) by DXA vs four by STM (13%; kappa: 0.76) and only two by BIA (6.6%; kappa: 0.44) compared with DXA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite good statistical agreement among values obtained with DXA, STM, and BIA, the study findings indicate that STM and BIA, above all, tended to overestimate fat-free mass compared with DXA.

Oral supplement enriched in HMB combined with pulmonary rehabilitation improves body composition and health related quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis (Prospective, Randomised Study).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is recommended for bronchiectasis but there is no data about its effect on body composition. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) for 12 weeks in normally-nourished non-cystic-fibrosis bronchiectasis patients compared with the effect of PR plus a hyperproteic oral nutritional supplement enriched with beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) on body composition, muscle strength, quality of life and serum biomarkers. METHODS: single center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design: Participants were randomly assigned to receive PR for 12 weeks or PR plus ONS (PRONS) (one can per day). Outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks: body composition (Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA), mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC), phase angle by Bio-impedance), health related quality of life (Spanish QOL-B-V3.0, Physical Functioning Scale), handgrip strength, diet questionnaire, and plasma levels of prealbumin, myostatin and somatomedin-c. RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized (15 per group) without differences in clinical and respiratory variables. In the PRONS group bone mineral density (BMD), mean and maximum handgrip dynamometry, MAMC, QOLB and prealbumin were significantly increased from baseline at 12 and 24 weeks and Fat free Mass (FFM) and FFM index, at 12 weeks. In the PR group only mean handgrip dynamometry and prealbumin were significantly increased at 12 and 24 weeks. In both groups plasma myostatin was reduced at 12 weeks (without significant differences). CONCLUSION: The addition of a hyperproteic ONS enriched with HMB to Pulmonary Rehabilitation could improve body composition, BMD, muscle strength and health related quality of life in bronchiectasis patients. Clinical Trials Number NCT02048397.