Cost analysis of breast conservation surgery compared with modified radical mastectomy with and without reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation surgery (BCS), consisting of lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and radiation therapy, is as effective as modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. The costs of these treatment options have not been adequately addressed in the current era of increasing utilization of BCS and breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to determine differences in treatment costs among BCS, MRM alone, and MRM with reconstruction. METHODS: Patients with stage I and II breast cancer receiving inpatient treatment at a private university-affiliated hospital between January 1996 and July 1997 were analyzed (n = 230). Charges were determined as follows: inpatient and radiotherapy charges from the hospital billing department, surgeon fees from group practice billing codes, and radiotherapy physician fees from the radiation oncology group practice. Inpatient length of stay was obtained from hospital medical records. RESULTS: Average hospital inpatient charge for BCS was $4,748 (n = 74), $6,280 for MRM alone (P <0.001, n = 132), and $11,946 for MRM with reconstruction (P <0.001, n = 24). Surgeons' fees for BCS were $2,840, $3,500 for MRM alone, and $10,774 for MRM with reconstruction. The average radiotherapy charge was $18,742. Average length of stay was 1.03 days for BCS, 2.44 days for MRM alone (P <0.001), and 3.71 days for MRM with reconstruction (P <0. 001). Average total cost of BCS ($26,330) was significantly greater than the average total cost of either MRM alone ($9,780, P <0.001) or MRM with reconstruction ($22,720, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BCS is more expensive than MRM with or without reconstruction. It is the addition of radiotherapy that results in the higher total cost of CS.

The efficacy of thyroidectomy for Graves' disease: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for Graves' disease was largely replaced in the mid-1900s by radioiodine and antithyroid drugs, due to the belief that they were more safe and effective. Since then, thyroid surgery has improved with preoperative drug therapy and modern operative techniques. Recent clinical studies of thyroidectomy for Graves' disease may not reflect outcomes accurately because of small sample size, especially when estimating ideal thyroid remnant size. The purpose of this study was to combine modern clinical trials and use meta-analysis to determine the overall efficacy of both total (TT) and subtotal thyroidectomy (ST) for Graves' disease, compare thyroid function and complications rates of TT and ST, and determine ideal thyroid remnant size. METHODS: Meta-analysis was performed on published studies in which patients underwent either TT or ST for Graves' disease. Meta-analysis was performed by weighted least-squares linear regression. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 35 studies comprising 7241 patients. Mean follow-up was 5.6 years. Overall, persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism occurred in 7.2% of patients. TT was performed on 538 patients and hypothyroidism occurred in all cases. ST was performed in 6703 patients, 59.7% of whom achieved euthyroidism, 25. 6% became hypothyroid, and 7.9% had either persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism. Permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred in 0.9% of TT patients and 0.7% of ST patients (P = NS). Permanent hypoparathyroidism occurred in 1.6% of TT patients and 1.0% of ST patients (P = NS). There was an 8.9% decrease in hypothyroidism and 6.9% increase in euthyroidism for each gram of thyroid remnant (P < 0.0001 each). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, thyroidectomy successfully treated hyperthyroidism in 92% of patients with Graves' disease. There were no cases of hyperthyroidism following TT. ST achieved a euthyroid state in almost 60% of patients with an 8% rate of persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism. There was no significant difference in complication rates between TT and ST.