Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Bratisl Lek Listy ; 125(4): 239-243, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526860

RESUMO

NTRODUCTION: Distal pancreatectomy is a standard surgical procedure for selected benign, premalignant, and malignant lesions localized in the pancreatic body or tail. Surgical resection remains the only curative option for patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Perioperative and postoperative clinical courses were retrospectively assessed in patients, who underwent distal pancreatectomy during the 2011‒2021 period. RESULTS: During the 2011‒2021 period, a total of 112 distal pancreatectomies were performed. 67 patients (59.8%) underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, and 45 patients (40.2%) open laparotomy. The conversion was necessary for 13 patients (11.6%). Distal pancreatectomies performed laparoscopically were associated more often with biochemical leak and the development of grade B fistula, on the other hand grade C fistula developed only in patients operated by open laparotomy (LPT). The mean operating time was slightly longer in the laparoscopic group (227.1 min vs 214.6 min). The mean estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the LPT group (540.4 ml vs 191.9 ml). The mean hospitalization time was slightly longer in the LPT group (11.8 days vs 9.3 days). The rates of early reoperations were comparable between both groups (6 vs 5). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic techniques are preferred in centers around the world to bring patients benefits by using a minimally invasive approach. These techniques are also preferred in our center, in nearly 60% of all distal pancreatectomies performed during 10 years, but on the other hand, there is a much more careful approach chosen in cases of malignant disease to achieve adequate radicality (Tab.4, Ref. 20).


Assuntos
Fístula , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pâncreas , Laparoscopia/métodos , Fístula/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias
3.
Neoplasma ; 69(1): 165-173, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34818028

RESUMO

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive type of malignancy with one of the worst prognoses amongst any type of cancer. Surgery is applicable only to the limited number of patients with locally resectable tumors and currently represents the only curative treatment option. Treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can only extend patient survival. Despite advances in conventional therapies, the five-year survival of PDAC remained largely unchanged. New in vitro and in vivo models are therefore urgently needed to investigate this type of cancer. Here, we present the establishment and characterization of a novel pancreatic cancer cell line, isolated from a patient with PDAC. Cell line abbreviated as PANDA (PANncreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma) was established with an optimized 3D culture protocol published previously by our group. The new cancer cell line "PANDA" represents a novel in vitro approach for PDAC cancer research and new therapy testing.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Técnicas de Cultura de Células em Três Dimensões , Linhagem Celular , Humanos , Tecnologia
4.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 17(1): 6-10, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084763

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Kidneys from expanded criteria donors with diagnosis of brain death have become a part of the organ transplant program, which have thus increased the number of transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we identified the expanded criteria donors in a group of 156 kidney donors at our center. Basic parameters of the donors before kidney recovery were collected. Graft function, graft survival, and patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant were compared in expanded criteria versus standard criteria donors. RESULTS: Expanded criteria donors were significantly older than standard criteria donors (P < .001), had higher body mass index (P = .006), and had more frequent arterial hypertension (P < .001) and diabetes mellitus (P = .004) in their histories. When we considered the estimated glomerular filtration rate, graft function in the first 6 months after transplant was significantly worse in kidneys from expanded criteria donors (P = .011). In addition, recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors had significantly worse survival in the first year posttransplant (P = .023); however, no differences in graft survival were observed. CONCLUSIONS: From the long-term aspect, graft function and graft and patient survival in cases of kidneys from expanded criteria donors were comparable to results with kidneys from standard criteria donors. Expanded use of organs available for transplant is important due to the constantly increasing demands versus limited offers of organs.


Assuntos
Seleção do Doador/métodos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/etiologia , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Eslováquia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Prog Transplant ; 28(1): 87-90, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29402156

RESUMO

Delayed graft function continues to pose a significant challenge to clinicians in the context of kidney transplantation. The objective of this retrospective, 5-year analysis is to identify the parameters of beating heart donors and those of recipients that affect the delayed development of graft function. The monitored group was composed of 152 beating heart donors and 179 recipients. Delayed graft function was identified in 32 (17%) patients. The predictor for development of delayed graft function was the body mass index of the donor (odds ratio: 1.1473; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0017-1.3140; P = .0472), and the independent risk factors were donor body mass index 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.0215; 95% CI: 1.4188-25.556; P = .0149), donor body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 (HR: 13.5484; 95% CI: 1.4575-125.938; P = .0220), and abuse of alcohol in the donor's history (HR: 1.779; 95% CI: 1.0679-2.964; P = .0270).


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Função Retardada do Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Doadores Vivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
6.
Ann. hepatol ; 16(1): 149-156, Jan.-Feb. 2017. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-838097

RESUMO

Abstract: Introduction and aims. Liver resection is the treatment of choice for many primary and secondary liver diseases. Most studies in the elderly have reported resection of primary and secondary liver tumors, especially hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastatic cancer. However, over the last two decades, hepatectomy has become safe and is now performed in the older population, implying a paradigm shift in the approach to these patients. Material and methods. We retrospectively evaluated the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients over 65 years of age in comparison with those under 65 years of age after liver resection (n = 360). The set comprised 127 patients older than 65 years (35%) and 233 patients younger than 65 years (65%). Results. In patients younger than 65 years, there was a significantly higher incidence of benign liver tumors (P = 0.0073); in those older than 65 years, there was a significantly higher incidence of metastasis of colorectal carcinoma to the liver (0.0058). In patients older tan 65 years, there were significantly more postoperative cardiovascular complications (P = 0.0028). Applying multivariate analysis, we did not identify any independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The 12-month survival was not significantly different (younger versus older patients), and the 5-year survival was significantly worse in older patients (P = 0.0454). Conclusion. In the case of liver resection, age should not be a contraindication. An individualized approach to the patient and multidisciplinary postoperative care are the important issues.


Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Incidência , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Etários , Resultado do Tratamento , Ablação por Cateter/mortalidade , Eslováquia , Medição de Risco , Seleção de Pacientes , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Hepatectomia/métodos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia
7.
Ann Hepatol ; 16(1): 149-156, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28051804

RESUMO

Introduction and aims. Liver resection is the treatment of choice for many primary and secondary liver diseases. Most studies in the elderly have reported resection of primary and secondary liver tumors, especially hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastatic cancer. However, over the last two decades, hepatectomy has become safe and is now performed in the older population, implying a paradigm shift in the approach to these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients over 65 years of age in comparison with those under 65 years of age after liver resection (n = 360). The set comprised 127 patients older than 65 years (35%) and 233 patients younger than 65 years (65%). RESULTS: In patients younger than 65 years, there was a significantly higher incidence of benign liver tumors (P = 0.0073); in those older than 65 years, there was a significantly higher incidence of metastasis of colorectal carcinoma to the liver (0.0058). In patients older than 65 years, there were significantly more postoperative cardiovascular complications (P = 0.0028). Applying multivariate analysis, we did not identify any independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The 12-month survival was not significantly different (younger versus older patients), and the 5-year survival was significantly worse in older patients (P = 0.0454). CONCLUSION: In the case of liver resection, age should not be a contraindication. An individualized approach to the patient and multidisciplinary postoperative care are the important issues.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ablação por Cateter/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Hepatectomia/métodos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Eslováquia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Vnitr Lek ; 62(1): 48-51, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Tcheco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967237

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis in a patient after kidney transplantation is a serious infective complication which increases the risk of loss of the graft and also the mortality of patients. The most important predisposing factor is the immunosuppressive therapy - mainly induction immunosuppression.Material and case description: 250 patients underwent kidney transplantation throughout the period of 12 years in the Transplant Center Martin. This set of patients included 5 patients (2 %) after heart valve replacement. We present the case of a patient after kidney transplantation with development of endocarditis of the bioprosthesis of the aortic valve one month after successful kidney transplantation. Diagnostics of endocarditis by standard procedures (examination by transthoracic echocardiogram, transesophageal echocardiography, hemocultures) was unsuccessful. We rarely diagnosed endocarditis only by PET-CT examination with a consequent change of the antibiotic treatment and successful managing of this post-transplant complication. CONCLUSION: Endocarditis after kidney transplantation is a serious complication which significantly worsens the mortality of patients. The risk of development of infective endocarditis after transplantation is also increased by induction, mainly by antithymocyte globulin. Diagnostics only by PET-CT examination is rare; however, in this case it fundamentally changed the approach to the patient and led to a successful treatment.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Bioprótese , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Endocardite/imunologia , Humanos , Imagem Multimodal , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/imunologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/imunologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...