The relationship between dysfunctional attitudes, maladaptive perfectionism, metacognition and symptoms of mania and depression in bipolar disorder: The role of self-compassion as a mediating factor.

BACKGROUND: Maladaptive cognitions appear to be associated with the severity of mood symptoms in bipolar disorder (BD), but findings are mixed and generally cross-sectional in design. METHOD: This study (n = 331) explored the associations between maladaptive cognitions and mood symptoms in BD over time (3 months), and the potential mediating effect of self-compassion cross-sectionally. Dysfunctional attitudes, maladaptive perfectionism and maladaptive metacognitions were explored separately with depressive and manic symptoms, and with current mood state in BD. RESULTS: The results showed maladaptive metacognitions to be the only significant predictor of depression at 3-month follow-up (ß = 0.31, p < .001), with no relationship to mania over time. Cross-sectionally, self-compassion partially mediated the relationship between all maladaptive cognitions and depression, with higher dysfunctional cognitions and lower self-compassion predicting increased severity of depressive symptoms. Only the relationship between dysfunctional attitudes and mania was partially mediated by self-compassion, however, the relationship was weak and suggestive that higher self-compassion predicted increased mania. LIMITATIONS: The study duration limited the possible analysis. Future longitudinal research is needed. Also, the study sample was not representative of the clinical population, making results less generalisable. Additionally, limited significant findings regarding manic symptoms supports the need for further research into active cognitions during this phase of BD. CONCLUSIONS: Maladaptive metacognitions were predictive of future depression severity, therefore, further exploration of metacognitive therapy for BD should be explored. Furthermore, self-compassion was shown to partially mediate the relationship between negative cognitions and mood, therefore further exploration of compassion-based therapies for BD is needed.

Metacognition and psychosis-spectrum experiences: A study of objective and subjective measures.

BACKGROUND: Metacognition refers to appraising one's thoughts and behaviours. Deficits in metacognition are associated with psychosis-spectrum experiences, such as hallucinations and delusions, in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Assessments of metacognitive function and abilities in clinical populations often vary in administration duration, and subjectivity of scores. This study investigates associations between different measures of metacognition and their prediction of psychosis spectrum experiences using objective and self-report measures in a cross-sectional study of psychosis-spectrum disorder (PSD) participants and controls. METHOD: Twenty-three individuals with PSD and forty-four controls were recruited online and completed in-the-moment objective ratings of metacognitive accuracy (meta-Dots Task), and retrospective self-report of metacognitive self-reflection (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale) and abilities (Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale). RESULTS: There were group differences in self-reported metacognition, with PSD participants having lower scores of metacognitive ability, but no differences in self-reflectiveness or objective metacognitive accuracy. In the PSD group, only self-reported metacognitive ability was associated with and predicted distress about, and conviction in, delusional thoughts. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate group differences in some self-reported, but not objective, measures of metacognition, and highlight that prediction of PSD experiences depends on the metacognitive construct being measured, and the type of measurement used.

Influence of methodological and patient factors on serum NMDAR IgG antibody detection in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional and case-control studies.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) have been detected in patients with psychosis. However, studies measuring the IgG subclass in serum have provided variable estimates of prevalence, and it is unclear whether these antibodies are more common in patients than controls. Because these inconsistencies could be due to methodological approaches and patient characteristics, we aimed to investigate the effect of these factors on heterogeneity. METHODS: We searched Web of Science and Ovid (MEDLINE and PsycINFO) for cross-sectional and case-control studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and May 5, 2019, that reported NMDAR IgG antibody seropositivity in patients with psychosis. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) were derived using random-effects models. We estimated between-study variance (τ2) and the proportion of observed variance due to heterogeneity (I2). We then used univariable random-effects meta-regression analysis to investigate the effect of study factors on heterogeneity of proportions and ORs. Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018099874). FINDINGS: Of 1276 articles in the initial search, 28 studies were eligible for inclusion, including 14 cross-sectional studies and 14 case-control studies. In cross-sectional studies, NMDAR IgG antibodies were detected in 0·73% (95% CI 0·09-1·38; I2 56%; p=0·026) of patients with psychosis, and in case-control studies, patients with psychosis were not significantly more likely to be seropositive than healthy individuals (OR 1·57, 95% CI 0·78-3·16; I2 15%; p=0·20). Meta-regression analyses indicated that heterogeneity was significantly associated with assay type across both study designs, illness stage in cross-sectional studies, and study quality in case-control studies. Compared with studies using a fixed cell-based assay, cross-sectional and case-control studies using the live method yielded higher pooled prevalence estimates (0·36% [95% CI -0·23 to 0·95] vs 2·97% [0·70 to 5·25]) and higher ORs (0·65 [0·33 to 1·29] vs 4·43 [1·73 to 11·36]). In cross-sectional studies, the prevalence was higher in exclusively first-episode samples than in multi-episode or mixed samples (2·18% [0·25 to 4·12] vs 0·16% [-0·31 to 0·63]), and in case-control studies, higher ORs were reported in low-quality studies than in high-quality studies (3·80 [1·47 to 9·83] vs 0·72 [0·36 to 1·42]). INTERPRETATION: Higher estimates of NMDAR IgG antibody prevalence have been obtained with the live cell-based assay, and studies using this method find that seropositivity is more common in patients with psychosis than in controls. The effects of illness stage and study quality on heterogeneity were not consistent across study designs, and we provide clear recommendations for clinicians and researchers regarding interpreting these findings. FUNDING: None.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of serum neuronal cell surface antibodies in first-episode psychosis: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is a common presenting feature in antibody-mediated encephalitis, for which prompt recognition and treatment usually leads to remission. We aimed to investigate whether people with circumscribed schizophrenia-like illnesses have such antibodies-especially antibodies against the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-more commonly than do healthy controls. METHODS: We recruited patients aged 14-35 years presenting to any of 35 mental health services sites across England with first-episode psychosis, less than 6 weeks of treatment with antipsychotic medication, and a score of 4 or more on at least one selected Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) item. Patients and controls provided venous blood samples. We completed standardised symptom rating scales (PANSS, ACE-III, GAF) at baseline, and tested serum samples for antibodies against NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, the GABAA receptor, and the AMPA receptor using live cell-based assays. Treating clinicians assessed outcomes of ICD diagnosis and functioning (GAF) at 6 months. We included healthy controls from the general population, recruited as part of another study in Cambridge, UK. FINDINGS: Between Feb 1, 2013, and Aug 31, 2014, we enrolled 228 patients with first-episode psychosis and 105 healthy controls. 20 (9%) of 228 patients had serum antibodies against one or more of the neuronal cell surface antibodies compared with four (4%) of 105 controls (unadjusted odds ratio 2·4, 95% CI 0·8-7·3). These associations remained non-significant when adjusted for current cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and illicit drug use. Seven (3%) patients had NMDAR antibodies compared with no controls (p=0·0204). The other antibodies did not differ between groups. Antibody-positive patients had lower PANSS positive, PANSS total, and catatonia scores than did antibody-negative patients. Patients had comparable scores on other PANSS items, ACE-III, and GAF at baseline, with no difference in outcomes at 6 months. INTERPRETATION: Some patients with first-episode psychosis had antibodies against NMDAR that might be relevant to their illness, but did not differ from patients without NMDAR antibodies in clinical characteristics. Our study suggests that the only way to detect patients with these potentially pathogenic antibodies is to screen all patients with first-episode psychosis at first presentation. FUNDING: Medical Research Council.