Low bone mass in patients with motor disability: prevalence and risk factors in 59 Finnish children.

AIM: Children with motor disabilities are at increased risk of compromised bone health. This study evaluated prevalence and risk factors of low bone mass and fractures in these children. METHOD: This cross-sectional cohort study evaluated bone health in 59 children (38 males, 21 females; median age 10 y 11 mo) with motor disability (Gross Motor Function Classification System levels II-V). Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; BMD values were corrected for bone size (bone mineral apparent density [BMAD]) and skeletal maturity, and compared with normative data. Spinal radiographs were obtained to assess vertebral morphology. Blood biochemistry included vitamin D concentration and other parameters of calcium homeostasis. RESULTS: Ten children (17%) had sustained in total 14 peripheral fractures; lower-limb fractures predominated. Compression fractures were present in 25%. The median spinal BMAD z-score was -1.0 (range -5.0 to 2.0); it was -0.6 in those without fractures and -1.7 in those with fractures (p=0.004). Vitamin D insufficiency was present in 59% of participants (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D <50 nmol/l) and hypercalciuria in 27%. Low BMAD z-score and hypercalciuria were independent predictors for fractures. INTERPRETATION: Children with motor disability are at high risk of peripheral and vertebral fractures and low BMD. Evaluation of bone health and prevention of osteoporosis should be included in the follow-up.

Spine after solid organ transplantation in childhood: a clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 40 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the spine in 40 young adults after solid organ transplantation in childhood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of organ transplantation and long-term immunosuppressive treatment on growing spine using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A review of the current literature reveals no systematic evaluation of the spine after transplantation in childhood. METHODS: A total of 40 adult patients (mean age 22.1 years, range, 16.0-27.0), who received either kidney, liver, or heart transplant as children, were evaluated. Mean follow-up after transplantation was 11.2 years (range 3.0-18.0). All patients filled in a questionnaire, underwent an interview and physical examination, as well as had MRI of the spine. Standing spinal radiographs were taken from patients with a rib hump > or = 6 degrees. RESULTS: There were 8 (20%) patients who had a history of vertebral fracture. Eleven (28%) patients reported frequent back pain at rest. There were 15 (38%) patients who had scoliosis > 10 degrees (range 10 degrees -69 degrees ). On MRI, narrowed disc spaces were noted in 32 (80%) patients, and irregular endplates were noted in 24 (60%). There were 14 (35%) patients who had at least 1 compressed or wedged vertebra (> 20%). Patients treated for acute rejection had wedged vertebrae, speckled or black disc spaces, and irregular endplates more often than patients without rejections. Males had wedged vertebrae more often than females (P = 0.0067). CONCLUSIONS: Back pain, scoliosis, wedged vertebrae, and narrowed, degenerated disc spaces are common after solid organ transplantation in childhood.

Incidence and predictors of fractures in children after solid organ transplantation: a 5-year prospective, population-based study.

UNLABELLED: In this population-based prospective follow-up study, children undergoing solid organ transplantation had a highly elevated risk for fractures: The incidence of all fractures was 6-fold higher (92 versus 14 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) and vertebral fractures was 160-fold higher (57 versus 0.35 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) in the study group compared with the control population. Thus, screening of vertebral fractures at regular intervals is recommended, and preventive strategies should be studied. INTRODUCTION: The incidence and predictors of fractures after solid organ transplantation are not well documented in the pediatric age group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 196 children, which is 93% of patients surviving kidney, liver, and heart transplantation in our country, participated in a retrospective chart review at enrollment followed by a 5-year prospective follow-up study between January 1999 and December 2004. Hospital and medical records were reviewed. All children underwent clinical examinations and answered questionnaires concerning fracture history at the beginning and at the end of the prospective follow-up. Radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were obtained. The fracture incidence was compared with data obtained from public health registries. RESULTS: Seventy-five (38%) of the transplant patients suffered from a total of 166 fractures after organ transplantation. The incidence of all fractures was 6-fold higher (92 versus 14 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) and vertebral fractures was 160-fold higher (57 versus 0.35 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) in the study group compared with the control population. The age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were 61.3 (40.7-92.4) for vertebral, 17.9 (8.96-35.8) for symptomatic vertebral, 0.99 (0.65-1.50) for nonvertebral, and 2.90 (2.25-3.73) for all fractures in the patients compared with the control population. In a multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [95% CI]; 2.02 [1.07-3.83]), male sex (2.15 [1.22-3.81]), liver transplantation (1.78 [1.01-3.14]), and fractures before transplantation (2.02 [0.92-4.47]) were the most significant independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Children undergoing solid organ transplantation have a highly elevated risk for fractures. Screening of vertebral fractures at regular intervals is recommended, and preventive strategies should be studied.

Allergic rhinitis and pharmacological management in elite athletes.

INTRODUCTION: Only a few studies have examined the occurrence of atopy and clinically apparent allergic disease and their pharmacological management in elite athletes. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of allergic rhinitis and the use of antiallergic medication within the subgroups of elite athletes as compared with a representative sample of young adults of the same age. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2002. All the athletes (N = 494) financially supported by the National Olympic Committee comprised the study group. Of them, 446 (90.3%) filled in a structured questionnaire concerning asthma and allergies, the use of medication, characteristics of sport activities, and smoking habits. A representative sample of Finnish young adults (N = 1504) served as controls. RESULTS: The endurance athletes reported physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis more often (36.1%) than other athletes (23.4%) or control subjects (20.2%). The use of antiallergic medication was reported by 33.3, 15.7, and 15.6% of those, respectively. Among both athletes and controls, females reported the use of antiallergic medication more often than males. Only half of those athletes reporting allergic rhinitis had used antiallergic medication during the past year. After adjusting for age and sex, OR (95% CI) for allergic rhinitis and the use of antiallergic medication were 2.24 (1.48-3.39) and 2.79 (1.82-4.28), respectively, in endurance athletes as compared with the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Endurance athletes have physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis, and they use antiallergic medication more often than athletes in other events or control subjects. Only half of those athletes reporting allergic rhinitis take antiallergic medication. More attention needs to be paid to the optimal management of allergic rhinitis, especially in highly trained endurance athletes.

Asthma medication in Finnish olympic athletes: no signs of inhaled beta2-agonist overuse.

INTRODUCTION: Occurrence of asthma has been reported to be frequent in endurance athletes and especially high in winter sport athletes. Recently, the International Olympic Committee has restricted the use of inhaled beta2-agonists and requires documentation for their use. However, epidemiologic data comparing the use of antiasthmatic medication in different sport events are mostly missing. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was carried out in 2002. All the athletes (N = 494) financially supported by National Olympic Committee comprised the study group. Of them, 446 (90.3%) filled in a structured questionnaire concerning asthma and allergies, use of medication, characteristics of sport activities, and smoking habits. A representative sample of Finnish young adults (N = 1 504) served as controls. RESULTS: Physician-diagnosed asthma was more common in athletes as compared with controls (13.9% vs 8.4%). Use of any asthma medication was reported by 9.6% of the athletes and by 4.2% of the controls. No difference was observed in the frequency of asthma medication used by winter or summer sport athletes (10.0% vs 9.4%). Inhaled beta2-agonists were used by 7.4% and 3.0% of the athletes and controls, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and smoking, odds ratio with 95% confidence interval for use of any asthma medication was 0.69 (0.17-2.92) for motor skills demanding events, 1.87 (0.85-4.11) for speed and power sports, 3.00 (1.68-5.37) for team sports, and 4.16 (2.22-7.78) for endurance events as compared with controls. None of the athletes used antiasthmatic medication without physician diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of antiasthmatic medication is clearly lower than the occurrence of physician-diagnosed asthma in Finnish Olympic athletes. No evidence of overuse of inhaled beta2-agonists is found.