Antibacterial and immunological properties of piperine evidenced by preclinical studies: a systematic review.

Aim: To review in vitro, in vivo, and in silico studies examining the antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties of piperine (PPN). Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, and five databases were searched. Results: A total of 40 articles were included in this study. Six aspects of PPN activity were identified, including antibacterial spectrum, association with antibiotics, efflux pump inhibition, biofilm effects, protein target binding, and modulation of immune functions/virulence factors. Most studies focused on Mycobacterium spp. and Staphylococcus aureus. Cell lineages and in vivo models were employed to study PPN antibacterial effects. Conclusion: We highlight PPN as a potential adjuvant in the treatment of bacterial infections. PPN possesses several antibacterial properties that need further exploration to determine the mechanisms behind its pharmacological activity.

Binding of piperine to mycobacterial RNA polymerase improves the efficacy of rifampicin activity against Mycobacterium leprae and nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Piperine (PPN) is a known inhibitor of efflux pumps in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and in vitro synergism with rifampicin (RIF) has been proven. The current study evaluates the activity of PPN and synergism with RIF in rapidly and slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Also, to propose a possible mechanism of interaction of PPN with M. leprae (Mlp) RNA polymerase (RNAp). Minimal inhibitory concentration and drug combination assay was determined by resazurin microtiter assay and resazurin drug combination assay, respectively. In silico evaluation of PPN binding was performed by molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD). PPN showed higher antimicrobial activity against rapidly growing NTM (32-128 mg/L) rather than for slowly growing NTM (≥ 256 mg/L). Further, 77.8% of NTM tested exhibited FICI ≤ 0.5 when exposed to PPN and RIF combination, regardless of growth speed. Docking and MD simulations showed a possible PPN binding site at the interface between ß and ß' subunits of RNAp, in close proximity to the trigger-helix and bridge-helix elements. MD results indicated that PPN binding hindered the mobility of these elements, which are essential for RNA transcription. We hypothesize that PPN binding might affect mycobacterial RNAp activity, and, possibly, RIF activity and that this mechanism is partially responsible for synergic behaviors with RIF reported in vitro. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.