Using an Accelerated Undergraduate Needs Finding Course to Build Skills, Inspire Confidence, and Promote Interest in Health Technology Innovation.

Many undergraduate educational experiences in biomedical design lack clinical immersion-based needs finding training for students. Convinced of the merits of this type of training for undergraduates, but unable to offer a quarter-long course due to faculty and administrative constraints, we developed an accelerated block-plan course, during which students were dedicated solely to our class for 3 weeks. The course focused on the earliest stages of the health technology innovation process-conducting effective clinical observations and performing comprehensive need research and screening. We grounded the course in experiential learning theory (with hands-on, collaborative, and immersive experiences) and constructivist learning theory (where students integrated prior knowledge with new material on need-driven innovation). This paper describes the design of this intensive block-plan course and the teaching methods intended to support the achievement of five learning objectives. We used pre- and post-course surveys to gather self-reported data about the effect of the course on student learning. Despite the accelerated format, we saw statistically significant gains for all but one sub-measure across the learning objectives. Our experience supports key benefits of the block-plan model, and the results indicate that specific course design choices were effective in achieving positive learning outcomes. These design decisions include (1) opportunities for students to practice observations before entering the clinical setting; (2) a framework for the curriculum that reinforced important concepts iteratively throughout the program; (3) balanced coverage of preparation, clinical immersion, and need research; (4) extensive faculty and peer coaching; and (5) providing hands-on prototyping opportunities while staying focused on need characterization rather than solution development. Based on our experience, we expect that this model is replicable across institutions with limited bandwidth to support clinical immersion opportunities.

Comparative Study of Safety Outcomes Following Nucleus Disassembly with and without the miLOOP Lens Fragmentation Device During Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To determine the effect of a microinterventional lens prefragmentation wire loop device (miLOOP®; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany), on adverse events (AEs), cumulative dispersed energy (CDE), and vision outcomes when used before phacoemulsification of high-grade mature cataracts. Setting: Three ambulatory surgical centers in the Peoria, IL region. Design: Retrospective comparative consecutive case series; single-surgeon. Methods: Patient outcomes were compared before and after introduction of miLOOP-assisted lens fragmentation prior to phacoemulsification during cataract surgeries performed 2016‒2020. The primary outcome was intraoperative AE rate/type. Secondary outcomes included ultrasound cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) administered during phacoemulsification, postoperative AEs, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: Data from 765 subjects (mean age 72.9 years; 1025 eyes) comprised 524 conventional lens disassembly (Control) eyes and 501 Device eyes. One hundred percent of the cataracts in both groups were advanced WHO Grade 3+ nuclei. Significantly fewer intraoperative AEs occurred in the Device group versus Controls (2.2% and 6.3% of eyes, respectively; p=0.0011). Postoperative AE rates were comparable between groups (Controls=2.9%, Device=3.5%). Mean CDE from ultrasound was significantly reduced by 21% when the microfilament loop device was used for nuclear disassembly (9.6±5.2 CDE units) versus Controls (11.6±6.4 CDE units; p<0.0001). Median postoperative BCVA was 20/25 Snellen (0.091 logMAR) in both groups. More than 70% of both Control and Device eyes had postoperative BCVA better than 20/30 Snellen. Conclusion: Microinterventional lens fragmentation was associated with lower ultrasound energy use and improved intraoperative safety than traditional unassisted surgery of advanced high-grade cataracts, while maintaining similarly acceptable postoperative complication rates and BCVA functional outcomes.

Affordable IgY-based antiviral prophylaxis for resource-limited settings to address epidemic and pandemic risks.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 exposed a global problem, as highly effective vaccines are challenging to produce and distribute, particularly in regions with limited resources and funding. As an alternative, immunoglobulins produced in eggs of immunized hens (IgY) can be a simple and inexpensive source for a topical and temporary prophylaxis. Here, we developed a method to extract and purify IgY antibodies from egg yolks of hens immunized against viral pathogen-derived proteins using low-cost, readily available materials, for use in resource-limited settings. Methods: Existing protocols for IgY purification and equipment were modified, including extraction from yolks and separation of water-soluble IgY using common household reagents and tools. A replacement for a commercial centrifuge was developed, using a home food processor equipped with a 3D printed adapter to enable IgY precipitation. IgY purification was verified using standard gel electrophoresis and Western blot analyses. Results: We developed a step-by-step protocol for IgY purification for two settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC): a local laboratory, where commercial centrifuges are available, or a more rural setting, where an alternative for expensive centrifuges can be used. Gel electrophoresis and Western blot analyses confirmed that the method produced highly enriched IgY preparation; each commercial egg produced ~ 90 mg of IgY. We also designed a kit for IgY production in these two settings and provided a cost estimate of the kit. Conclusion: IgY purified from eggs of immunized local hens can offer a fast and affordable prophylaxis, provided that purification can be performed in a resource-limited setting. Here, we created a low-cost method that can be used anywhere where electricity is available using inexpensive, readily available materials in place of costly, specialized laboratory equipment and chemicals. This procedure can readily be used now to make an anti-SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis in areas where vaccines are unavailable, and can be modified to combat future threats from viral epidemics and pandemics.

Effect of microinterventional endocapsular nucleus disassembly using centripetal loop fragmentation on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive impact of centripetal fragmentation using the miLOOP system for nucleus disassembly, which minimizes lens zonulocapsular instability associated with endocapsular lens manipulation. SETTING: Private practice, Batesville, Indiana, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative consecutive series. METHODS: Refractive outcomes were compared for consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation before and after the introduction of a microinterventional endocapsular nucleus disassembly technique using the miLOOP system. Eyes with a history of previous surgery or ocular comorbidities were excluded. The primary outcome was the median absolute error (MedAE) from the preoperative predicted refraction. Secondary outcomes included corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and the proportion of eyes within predicted diopter (D) ranges. RESULTS: A total of 118 eyes of 79 patients were analyzed, with 69 eyes undergoing conventional nuclear disassembly and 49 eyes receiving the microinterventional technique. The MedAE for eyes using conventional nucleus disassembly vs the microinterventional technique was 0.191 D vs 0.107 D, respectively (P = .002). For CDVA and UDVA, the microinterventional approach resulted in a trend toward a higher proportion of eyes achieving acuities better than 20/30, 20/25, and 20/20 compared with conventional techniques. The microinterventional approach showed a trend toward more eyes achieving less than ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of prediction error from the predicted diopter range. CONCLUSIONS: Microinterventional nuclear disassembly might improve refractive outcomes by reducing refractive prediction error.

Correction to: An Extended Hackathon Model for Collaborative Education in Medical Innovation.

We append two additional funders to our acknowledgments.

An Extended Hackathon Model for Collaborative Education in Medical Innovation.

To support the next generation of healthcare innovators - whether they be engineers, designers, clinicians, or business experts by training - education in the emerging field of medical innovation should be made easily and widely accessible to undergraduate students, graduate students, and young professionals, early in their careers. Currently, medical innovation curricula are taught through semester-long courses or year-long fellowships at a handful of universities, reaching only a limited demographic of participants. This study describes the structure and preliminary outcomes of a 1-2 week "extended hackathon" course that seeks to make medical innovation education and training more accessible and easily adoptable for academic medical centers. Eight extended hackathons were hosted in five international locations reaching 245 participants: Beijing (June 2015 and August 2016), Hong Kong (June 2016, 2017, and 2018), Curitiba (July 2016), Stanford (October 2017), and São Paulo (May 2018). Pre- and post-hackathon surveys asking respondents to self-assess their knowledge in ten categories of medical innovation were administered to quantify the perceived degree of learning. Participants hailed from a diverse range of educational backgrounds, domains of expertise, and academic institutions. On average, respondents (n = 161) saw a greater than twofold increase (114.1%, P < 0.001) from their pre- to post-hackathon scores. In this study, the extended hackathon is presented as a novel educational model to teach undergraduate and graduate students a foundational skillset for medical innovation. Participants reported gaining significant knowledge across all ten categories assessed. To more robustly assess the educational value of extended hackathons, a standardized assessment for medical innovation knowledge needs to be developed, and a larger sample size of participants surveyed.

Effect of intratonsillar injection of steroids on the palatine tonsils of rabbits.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Nasal steroids may significantly improve nasal obstructive symptoms with a reduction of adenoid size in children, but they do not consistently yield the same concurrent effect on enlarged palatine tonsils. Failure of nasal steroids to decrease the size of palatine tonsils is believed to be attributable to location and washout by saliva. The purpose of this study was to determine if direct application of steroid via intratonsillar injection would reduce the size of palatine tonsils in the rabbit model. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective animal study. METHODS: Eight rabbits (16 tonsils) were administered intratonsillar injections of fluticasone (n = 8, 1 mg/ml) or saline (n = 8, 0.1 ml) on days 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, and 17. Two rabbits (4 tonsils) received a single steroid injection to compare single versus multiple steroid injections. The rabbit's tonsil size was measured before each injection. After the fifty injections, the tonsils were harvested for histologic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 16 tonsils were analyzed. After five steroid injections, the reduction (-7.7 mm(2) ± 4.27) in size was statistically significant when compared to reduction (6.12 mm(2) ± 6.57) in the saline injected group (P = 0.001). Repeated steroid injection was more potent than a single injection (-3.00 mm(2) ± 3.08) in reducing the size (P = 0.006). In histologic analysis, tonsils after repeated steroid injections were significantly smaller than saline-injected tonsils (P = 0.014), without obvious lymphoid follicles. CONCLUSION: Repeated focal tonsillar injections of corticosteroids significantly reduced the size of palatine tonsils as compared to saline-injected controls. A single injection of corticosteroids appears to be effective, but not as effective, as multiple injections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.