Living donor liver transplant in acute on chronic liver failure grade 3: Who not to transplant.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Liver transplantation(LT)offers definitive treatment for acute on chronic liver failure(ACLF) patients. This study was done to analyze and compare the outcomes of living donor LT(LDLT) in patients with ACLF versus Chronic liver disease(CLD) and within the grades of ACLF. Factors affecting mortality in patients with ACLF and ACLF grade3 (ACLF3) following LDLT were also derived. METHODS: Records of adult LDLT between 1/2/2017 and 30/9/2021 were analyzed. ACLF was classified based on EASL-CLIF definition. Post-transplant outcomes of ACLF were compared with CLD and within ACLF grades. Post LDLT mortality predictors were identified in ACLF and ACLF3 patients. RESULTS: Out of 853 patients who had LT in that period; 704 patients with CLD and 103 with ACLF [of which 54 (52.42%) had ACLF3] underwent LDLT. The one month and one-year post LDLT mortality was 8.81% and 9.80% in CLD; 19.42% and 31.06% in ACLF; and 25.92% and 38.89% in ACLF3 respectively. On log regression analysis, use of grafts from older donors and pre-operative respiratory failure in recipients was associated with poor survival in ACLF, while respiratory failure was a predictor of poor survival in ACLF3 following LDLT. CONCLUSION: Outcomes following LDLT are poorer in ACLF as compared to after CLD. Higher donor age and preoperative respiratory failure with PF Ratio<200 were associated with poor survival post LDLT in ACLF and ACLF3.

Living donor liver transplant outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: does a decrease in case volume impact the overall outcomes?

Background: High-volume centers (HVCs) are classically associated with better outcomes. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a decrease in the regular liver transplantation (LT) activity at our center. This study analyzed the effect of the decline in LT on posttransplant patient outcomes at our HVC. Methods: We compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent LT during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown (April 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020) with outcomes in the pre-pandemic calendar year (April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020). Results: During the 6 months of pandemic lockdown, 60 patients underwent LT (43 adults and 17 children) while 228 patients underwent LT (178 adults and 50 children) during the pre-pandemic calendar year. Patients in the pandemic group had significantly higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (24.39±9.55 vs. 21.14±9.17, P=0.034), Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (11.46±2.32 vs. 10.25±2.24, P=0.03), and incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure (30.2% vs. 10.2%, P=0.002). Despite performing LT in sicker patients with COVID-19-related challenges, the 30-day (14% vs. 18.5%, P=0.479), 3-month (16.3% vs. 20.2%, P=0.557), and 6-month mortality rates (23.3% vs. 28.7%, P=0.477) were lower, but not statistically significant when compared to the pre-pandemic cohort. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown the number of LT procedures performed at our HVC declined by half because prevailing conditions allowed LT in very sick patients only. Despite these changes, outcomes were not inferior during the pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic calendar year. Greater individualization of patient care contributed to non-inferior outcomes in these sick recipients.

Normative cutoffs of muscle mass, muscle strength, and frailty for healthy Indian population.

BACKGROUND: Population-derived cutoffs for low skeletal muscle mass, skeletal muscle strength, and frailty among Indians are lacking. Studies describing sarcopenia and frailty among patients with chronic liver diseases have used cutoffs derived from Caucasian populations giving erroneous results. AIMS: We aimed to derive gender-specific cutoffs for low skeletal muscle mass and skeletal muscle strength from healthy Indians. METHODS: Healthy Indian population consisted of two groups. Group 1 (Gp I) included 242 healthy liver donors and group 2 (Gp II) 272 healthy health care workers. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated from computed tomography (CT) abdomen performed prior to donor hepatectomy only in Gp I. Liver frailty index (LFI) was computed using the online calculator, after recording hand grip strength (HGS), chair stand-up test (CSUT), and balance test in both groups. HGS was measured using the Smedley handgrip dynamometer. CSUT was noted as time to complete 5 chair stand-ups with subjects' arms folded across the chest. Gender-specific cutoffs of SMI and HGS were derived as <5th percentile of the distribution values and as >95th percentile for CSUT and LFI values. RESULTS: The SMI was measured from Gp I subjects (n=242; 120 males [mean age 31.13] and 122 females [mean age 36.60]). The HGS, CSUT, and LFI were measured in Gp I and Gp II subjects (n=514; 272 males [mean age 34.30] and 242 females [mean age 37.52]). The cutoffs for SMI, HGS, CSUT, and LFI were <27.72 cm2/m2, <25.63 kg, >10 s, and >3.49, respectively for healthy males. The corresponding cutoffs for healthy females were <24.4 cm2/m2, <16.7 kg, > 10 s, and >3.68, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We derived gender-specific cutoffs for SMI, HGS, CSUT, and LFI from healthy adult Indian population, which can be used to detect sarcopenia and frailty among patients with liver diseases, as well as other conditions.