Impact of metabolic bariatric surgery on outcomes and the 10-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events during a 7-year period: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic bariatric surgery offers enduring weight reduction and alleviation of obesity-related comorbidities, including dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Long-term data on one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) is lacking, necessitating this investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter prospectively-collected retrospective observational study, 830 adult Taiwanese patients (682 OAGB, 148 SADJB-SG) who underwent surgery from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017, were initially identified. Following protocol, 224 patients (177 OAGB, 47 SADJB-SG) with complete follow-up data at various intervals up to three years after surgery were included in the final analysis. The study's primary focus is to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, and durability of OAGB and SADJB-SG in promoting weight loss and diabetes remission. Additionally, changes in 10-year and lifetime risks of MACE before and 3-year after surgery are assessed using Taiwan MACE risk prediction model and the China-PAR project model. RESULTS: SADJB-SG patients exhibit higher diabetes prevalence, lower body mass index, and more severe diabetes compared to OAGB. Both groups demonstrate significant improvements in body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia three years after surgery, with the most substantial improvements occurring in the second year. The Taiwan MACE risk model reveals a significant reduction in 10-year MACE and stroke risks for both groups. The China-PAR project model indicates a synchronized reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 10-year and lifetime risk in both OAGB and SADJB-SG groups. CONCLUSIONS: OAGB and SADJB-SG exhibit sustained improvements in weight reduction and obesity-related comorbidities over three years after surgery. Notably, both procedures contribute to a substantial reduction in 10-year MACE, stroke, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks. These findings underscore the efficacy of OAGB and SADJB-SG in the context of metabolic bariatric surgery.

Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) for Poor Response of Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (DJB-SG) (Video Report).

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has actually focused not only on obesity but also more on the improvements or remission of the metabolic diseases. Therefore, revisional surgery is indicated for patients with poor response to the primary bariatric surgery to control weight and obesity-associated medical conditions. METHOD: In this video report, the patient was a 27-year-old Asian female with an initial BMI of 36.5 kg/m2 and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c: 11.9%). She underwent primary bariatric surgery of laparoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (DJB-SG) in June 2019. She had a nadir BMI of 28.8 kg/m2 (corresponding body weight of 72 kg) in June 2020. However, she regained weight (BMI: 34 kg/m2) and had a relapse of diabetes with an HbA1c of 12.0% at the time of consultation for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in September 2022. After a multidisciplinary team evaluation, laparoscopic procedures of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with resizing the gastric tube, removal of duodenal-jejunal anastomosis, and lengthening of the biliopancreatic limb were performed. RESULTS: The operative time was 186 min and blood loss was 50 ml. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 5. At the 3-month follow-up after RBS, the patient had lost 13 kg (weight dropped from 85 to 72 kg) and achieve remission of diabetes with HbA1c of 5.7%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic OAGB is technically feasible and practical as a revisional procedure for poor response of DJB-SG.

From Our One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Experience to Establishing Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass Procedure: A Single-Center Report.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective treatment for obesity with or without metabolic syndrome. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a well-established bariatric procedure developed over the past 20 years with excellent outcomes. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is introduced as a novel bariatric and metabolic procedure. There is some similarity between these two operations. This study aimed to present our SASI procedure based on the past experience of the OAGB in our center. METHOD: Thirty patients with obesity underwent SASI surgery from March 2021 to June 2022. Herein, we demonstrated our techniques step by step and key points of techniques learned from our experience with OAGB (shown in the video) with satisfying surgical outcomes. The clinical characteristics, peri-operative variables, and short-term outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: There was no case of conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and hospital stay were 135.2 ± 39.2 min, 16.5 ± 6.2 mL, and 3.6 ± 0.8 days, respectively. There is no postoperative leakage, bleeding, or mortality. The percentage of total weight loss and excess weight loss at 6 months were 31.2 ± 6.5 and 75.3 ± 14.9, respectively. Improvement in type 2 diabetes (11/11, 100%), hypertension (14/26, 53.8%), dyslipidemia (16/21, 76.2%), and obstructive sleep apnea (9/11, 81.8%) were observed at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Our experience showed that our proposed SASI technique is feasible and may help surgeons perform this promising bariatric procedure without encountering many obstacles.

Bariatric surgery trends and progress in Taiwan: 2010-2021.

INTRODUCTION: Taiwan is a leading country regarding bariatric surgery in Asia-Pacific. Since 2010, the Taiwan Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (TSMBS) has been accountable for the national evolution of bariatric surgery and inaugurated a national database accordingly. This study aimed to analyze the bariatric surgery trends and progress in Taiwan from 2010 to 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TSMBS database was collected on the basis of structured inquiries filled out by bariatric surgeons in Taiwan. All patients involving bariatric surgery were included. The data were stratified with the following objectives, including the types of bariatric procedures, demographic characteristics, and perioperative variables. A nationwide database was comprehensively analyzed and evaluated to determine the trends in the applications of the procedure. RESULTS: Data of 30,026 patients were enrolled. A 2.5-fold increase was observed in bariatric procedures, from 1218 in 2010 to 3005 in 2021. Within 12 years, female accounts for 61.8 %. The revisional rate was 3.40 % during the exploration stage (2010-2013), 2.77 % during the maturity stage (2013-2018), and 5.10 % during the expansion stage (2019-2021). The top five of primary bariatric surgery is sleeve gastrectomy (SG, 63.05 %), gastric clipping surgery (GC, 11.17 %), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, 9.34 %), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB, 8.80 %), and sleeve plus surgery (SG plus, 4.43 %). CONCLUSION: The trends and progress of Taiwan's bariatric surgery within recent decades are presented in this article. Taiwan's bariatric surgery case number has increased steadily from 2010 to 2021. Amongst all, SG has become the most dominant procedure since 2011 while OAGB takes up second place in 2020.

A practical port-sharing approach for concomitant cholecystectomy with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center experience.

Gallbladder disease is very common in obese patients. Concomitant cholecystectomy with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (CC-LSG) may be necessary in such cases, and it has been proven safe when indicated. Herein, we presented an experience of our practical four-port-sharing technique for CC-LSG that can substitute the conventional trocar placement. A cohort study was conducted between January 2017 and March 2022 using a prospective database. Out of 238 patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery, 45 patients with gallbladder disease received CC-LSG using our four-port-sharing technique. The patients' demographic characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were examined. Of 45 obese patients with gallbladder disease undergoing CC-LSG, 18 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, 25 patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis, and 2 patients with gallbladder polyps were identified. The mean age of these 45 patients (26 men and 19 women) was 38.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 41.8 kg/m2. There was no case of conversion to laparotomy. The mean operative time of LC and following LSG, the volume of blood loss, and hospital stay were 52.7 minutes and 95.2 minutes, 13.3 mL, and 3.8 days, respectively. No postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, bile leakage, staple leakage, pulmonary embolism, incisional hernia, and wound infection were noted. In CC-LSG, the application of our four-port-sharing technique is safe and feasible for obese patients with gallbladder diseases.

A Practically Modified Approach With Complete Posterior Mobilization for Three-port Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single-center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Although the procedure of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been standardized either in conventional lateral to medial or medial to lateral approach, surgeons occasionally face the challenge of poor visualization of the His angle and difficulty in complete posterior mobilization in limited surgical field. This study aimed to introduce our novel details of modified approach to address these issues. METHODS: One hundred patients with obesity underwent modified approach- three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Herein, we demonstrated our method to ease the procedure of gastric fundus mobilization with extensive posterior mobilization (shown in video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A336 ). The demographic characteristics and perioperative data were reviewed. RESULTS: There was no case of conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and hospital stay were 72.5±22.7 minutes, 11.6±10.5 mL, and 4.3±2.1 days, respectively. One postoperative leakage was observed and it was successfully treated with metallic covered stent. The percentage of total weight loss at 6 months and 1 year were 20.3±8.4 and 29.8±9.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that the modified technique is feasible and may help surgeons to accomplish a complete posterior mobilization, and better address the poor visualization of the the His angle-site owing to the interposition of floating omentum or bulging part of the stomach.

Revisional sleeve gastrectomy after failed gastric clipping for obesity: Report of two cases and review of literature.

Laparoscopic gastric clipping (LGC) is one of the bariatric surgeries that are minimally invasive and demonstrates effectiveness in reducing body weight for obese patients. However, the patients may later regain body weight and other treatments may be needed. In this case report, two cases with obesity received LGC, which initially reduced their weight. However, they presented with a progressive regaining of body weight a few years after the surgery. Thus, revisional sleeve gastrectomy was conducted in an institute to control their weight regain. Postoperative courses were smooth, and there was no complication. Thus, laparoscopic removal of gastric clipping accompanied with revisional sleeve gastrectomy is technically feasible for the patients.

Combined Re-sleeve and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass as a Second Stage After Sleeve Gastrectomy (Video Report).

BACKGROUND: In comparison with purely restrictive procedures, combined restrictive and malabsorptive procedures seem to produce better weight loss and comorbidity control in patients with morbid obesity. Two-stage bariatric surgery is popular and is a safe and efficient strategy for patients with super obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m2) and super-super obesity (BMI > 60 kg/m2). METHODS: The patient in this video was a 36-year-old man with an initial BMI of 53.2 kg/m2. Two-stage bariatric surgery was planned. The patient underwent the first stage, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, in 2018. Eighteen months after surgery, his lowest BMI was 38.8 kg/m2, and his excess weight loss was 50.9%. In 2021, he regained weight and reached a BMI of 42.4 kg/m2. Then, a second-stage bariatric surgery was performed. RESULTS: As shown in the video, combined re-sleeve and single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass constituted the second stage of bariatric surgery. During the operation, adhesiolysis was first performed, and the stomach was mobilized through a lateral-to-medial approach. Gastric transection was performed with a 36-Fr bougie. Then, the ileocecal junction was identified, and a location 250 cm from the cecum was selected as the anastomosis site. Gastro-ileal anastomosis (3 cm in diameter) was established with a stapler, and the two-layer suture method was used to close the defect. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 5 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Combined re-sleeve and SASI bypass has a few surgical morbidities and is promising as an alternative to second-stage duodenal switch in patients with super obesity.

Revisional Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass for Failed Gastric Clipping and Proximal Jejunal Bypass (GC-PJB) (Video Report).

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery, the most effective strategy to manage morbid obesity, has increased rapidly in the face of expanding obese population in the twenty-first century. Hence, it is reasonable to expect a rise in the need for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS), especially due to weight recidivism. METHOD: In this video report, the patient was a 28-year-old Asian female with an initial BMI of 42.6 kg/m2 and underwent primary bariatric surgery of laparoscopic gastric clipping with proximal jejunal bypass (GC-PJB) in January 2018. She had the nadir BMI of 35.2 kg/m2 in August 2019. However, she regained weight and her BMI rebounded to 43.7 kg/m2 at the time of consultation for RBS in 2021. After a multidisciplinary team evaluation, laparoscopic procedures of removal of gastric clip and single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass with preservation of previous jejunojejunal anastomosis were performed. RESULTS: The operative time was 216 min and blood loss was 25 ml. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged 4 days after surgery. At the 3-month follow-up after RBS, the patient had lost 25 kg (weight dropped from 119 to 94 kg), and the corresponding BMI was 34.5 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic removal of gastric clip and SASI bypass with preservation of previous jejunojejunal anastomosis is technically feasible and promising as a revisional procedure for failed GC-PJB.