Intra- and Peri-tumoral Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI to Identify Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Two hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative-intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T. ASSESSMENT: Radiomics features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions on preoperative DCE-MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best-performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI-reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1-102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The nomogram incorporating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI-reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high-risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low-risk patients. High-risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS. DATA CONCLUSION: The nomogram integrating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Prognostic value of LI-RADS category on MRI in patients with primary hepatic lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and MRI features of primary hepatic lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) categorized as LR-M or LR-4/5 using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 and to determine the prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 37 patients with surgically confirmed LELC were included. Two independent observers evaluated preoperative MRI features according to the LI-RADS version 2018. Clinical and imaging features were compared between two groups. RFS and the associated factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test. RESULTS: In total, 37 patients (mean age, 58.5 ± 10.3 years) were evaluated. Sixteen (43.2%) LELCs were categorized as LR-M and twenty-one (56.8%) LELCs were categorized as LR-4/5. In the multivariate analysis, the LR-M category was an independent factor for RFS (HR 7.908, 95% CI 1.170-53.437; p = 0.033). RFS rates were significantly lower in patients with LR-M LELCs than in patients with LR-4/5 LELCs (5-year RFS rate, 43.8% vs.85.7%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The LI-RADS category was significantly associated with postsurgical prognosis of LELC, with tumor categorized as LR-M having a worse RFS than those categorized as LR-4/5. KEY POINTS: • Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma patients categorized as LR-M have worse recurrence-free survival than those categorized as LR-4/5. • MRI-based LI-RADS categorization was an independent factor for postoperative prognosis of primary hepatic lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

Preparation and Compatibility Evaluation of Polypropylene/High Density Polyethylene Polyblends.

This study proposes melt-blending polypropylene (PP) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) that have a similar melt flow index (MFI) to form PP/HDPE polyblends. The influence of the content of HDPE on the properties and compatibility of polyblends is examined by using a tensile test, flexural test, Izod impact test, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarized light microscopy (PLM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The SEM results show that PP and HDPE are incompatible polymers with PP being a continuous phase and HDPE being a dispersed phase. The FTIR results show that the combination of HDPE does not influence the chemical structure of PP, indicating that the polyblends are made of a physical blending. The DSC and XRD results show that PP and HDPE are not compatible, and the combination of HDPE is not correlated with the crystalline structure and stability of PP. The PLM results show that the combination of HDPE causes stacking and incompatibility between HDPE and PP spherulites, and PP thus has incomplete spherulite morphology and a smaller spherulite size. However, according to mechanical property test results, the combination of HDPE improves the impact strength of PP.