Omega-3 fatty acids supplements for dry eye - Are they effective or ineffective?

Purpose: To evaluate effectiveness of omega-3 fatty acid supplements in relieving dry eye symptoms and signs in symptomatic visual display terminal users (VDT). Methods: A randomized controlled study was done; eyes of 470 VDT users were randomized to receive four capsules twice daily for 6 months (O3FAgroup), each containing 180 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid and 120 mg docosahexaenoic acid. The O3FA group was compared with another group (n = 480) who received four capsules of a placebo (olive oil) twice daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. The primary outcome was improvement in omega-3 index (a measure of EPA and DHA ratio in RBC membrane). Secondary outcomes were improvement dry eye symptoms, Nelson grade on conjunctival impression cytology, Schirmer test values, tear film breakup time (TBUT), and tear film osmolarity. Means of groups (pre-treatment, 1, 3, and 6-months) were compared with repeated measure analysis of variance. Results: At baseline, 81% patients had low omega-3 index. In the O3FA group, a significant increase in omega-3 index, improvement in symptoms, reduction in tear film osmolarity, and increase in Schirmer, TBUT, and goblet cell density was observed. These changes were not significant in the placebo group. Improvement in test parameters was significantly (P < 0.001) better in patients with low omega3 index (<4%) subgroup. Conclusion: Dietary omega-3 fatty acids are effective for dry eye in VDT users; omega-3 index appears to be the predictor to identify potential dry eye patients who are likely to benefit from oral omega-3 dietary intervention.

Long-term outcomes of small-incision cataract surgery in patients with uveitis.

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in eyes with uveitis. Methods: Patients who underwent MSICS for uveitic cataract from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Visually significant cataract and presence of less than five cells per high-power field in the anterior chamber for a minimum of 3 months were the prerequisites for surgery. Patients with follow-up less than 9 months were excluded. Results: After exclusion, 283 eyes of 264 patients were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 44.3 ± 11.3 years. The mean follow-up duration was 22 ± 11.5 months. The mean surgical time was 11.2 ± 3.2 min. One hundred and seventy-two eyes (60.8%) had anterior uveitis, 78 (27.5%) had posterior uveitis, and 33 (11.7%) had panuveitis. At the final follow-up, 253 eyes (88.4%) had corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) better than 0.6 log of minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) unit. The final endothelial cell counts were significantly (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P = 0.001) lower in eyes with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27-associated uveitis and in eyes with idiopathic anterior uveitis. Patients on systemic corticosteroids had significantly better (P = 0.031) final visual acuity than those without preoperative corticosteroids. Recurrent uveitis (43.8%), Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) (19.4%), glaucoma (8.5%), cystoid macular edema (CME; 13.5%), and Epiretinal membrane (ERM) (5.6%) were the frequent complications. A significantly worse (ANOVA, P = 0.001) visual prognosis was seen in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH), sarcoidosis, acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), and serpiginous choroiditis. Conclusion: MSICS is safe in most cataracts due to uveitis and results in improvement in CDVA at 9 months. Posterior capsule opacification, macular edema, persistent uveitis, etiology of uveitis, and use of preoperative steroids significantly influenced the visual outcome.

Safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (0.05% versus 0.09%) in dry eye disease. Is it the strength of cyclosporin that really matters?

INTRODUCTION: This is a multicenter, randomized, interventional, double masked study aimed to compare safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (0.05% versus 0.09%) in dry eye disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Random allocation of patients (n=450) was done in two groups by parallel assignment (1:1). Group1(n=225) received CAs 0.05% drops twice daily, and group 2 (n=225) received CAs 0.09% drops twice daily for 3 months. Primary outcomes were changes from baseline in Lissamine green staining score, Nelson grade on conjunctival impression cytology and tear film osmolarity. Secondary outcomes were changes in dry eye symptom score. Schirmer's test scores, changes in corneal fluorescein staining and changes in tear film break up time. RESULTS: Within the groups, there was a significant improvement (ANOVA, P<0.05) in tear film osmolarity, lissamine green staining score, dry eye symptom score, corneal fluorescein staining and Schirmer test scores over 3 months of intervention. However, the difference in Nelson Grade, goblet cell density, and tear film break-up time was not statistically significant. Between the groups, there was a significantly better improvement in tear film osmolarity (ANOVA, P<0.001), Lissamine green staining score (ANOVA, P=0.002), corneal fluorescein staining (ANOVA, P=0.011), dry eye symptoms (ANOVA, P=0.040) and Schirmer test scores (ANOVA, P=0.001) with CAs 0.09%. However, the improvement in Nelson grade, tear film break-up time was not significantly different between the two groups. The overall patient's comfort was significantly better over time in patients on CAs 0.05% (ANOVA, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Increasing strength of CAs better improves corneal staining, tear production, tear film osmolarity but not conjunctival morphology and tear film stability.