Dynamic and stable population coding of attentional instructions coexist in the prefrontal cortex.

A large body of recent work suggests that neural representations in prefrontal cortex (PFC) are changing over time to adapt to task demands. However, it remains unclear whether and how such dynamic coding schemes depend on the encoded variable and are influenced by anatomical constraints. Using a cued attention task and multivariate classification methods, we show that neuronal ensembles in PFC encode and retain in working memory spatial and color attentional instructions in an anatomically specific manner. Spatial instructions could be decoded both from the frontal eye field (FEF) and the ventrolateral PFC (vlPFC) population, albeit more robustly from FEF, whereas color instructions were decoded more robustly from vlPFC. Decoding spatial and color information from vlPFC activity in the high-dimensional state space indicated stronger dynamics for color, across the cue presentation and memory periods. The change in the color code was largely due to rapid changes in the network state during the transition to the delay period. However, we found that dynamic vlPFC activity contained time-invariant color information within a low-dimensional subspace of neural activity that allowed for stable decoding of color across time. Furthermore, spatial attention influenced decoding of stimuli features profoundly in vlPFC, but less so in visual area V4. Overall, our results suggest that dynamic population coding of attentional instructions within PFC is shaped by anatomical constraints and can coexist with stable subspace coding that allows time-invariant decoding of information about the future target.

Distinct roles of prefrontal and parietal areas in the encoding of attentional priority.

When searching for an object in a crowded scene, information about the similarity of stimuli to the target object is thought to be encoded in spatial priority maps, which are subsequently used to guide shifts of attention and gaze to likely targets. Two key cortical areas that have been described as holding priority maps are the frontal eye field (FEF) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP). However, little is known about their distinct contributions in priority encoding. Here, we compared neuronal responses in FEF and LIP during free-viewing visual search. Although saccade selection signals emerged earlier in FEF, information about the target emerged at similar latencies in distinct populations within the two areas. Notably, however, effects in FEF were more pronounced. Moreover, LIP neurons encoded the similarity of stimuli to the target independent of saccade selection, whereas in FEF, encoding of target similarity was strongly modulated by saccade selection. Taken together, our findings suggest hierarchical processing of saccade selection signals and parallel processing of feature-based attention signals within the parietofrontal network with FEF having a more prominent role in priority encoding. Furthermore, they suggest discrete roles of FEF and LIP in the construction of priority maps.

Top-Down Control of Visual Attention by the Prefrontal Cortex. Functional Specialization and Long-Range Interactions.

The ability to select information that is relevant to current behavioral goals is the hallmark of voluntary attention and an essential part of our cognition. Attention tasks are a prime example to study at the neuronal level, how task related information can be selectively processed in the brain while irrelevant information is filtered out. Whereas, numerous studies have focused on elucidating the mechanisms of visual attention at the single neuron and population level in the visual cortices, considerably less work has been devoted to deciphering the distinct contribution of higher-order brain areas, which are known to be critical for the employment of attention. Among these areas, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been considered a source of top-down signals that bias selection in early visual areas in favor of the attended features. Here, we review recent experimental data that support the role of PFC in attention. We examine the existing evidence for functional specialization within PFC and we discuss how long-range interactions between PFC subregions and posterior visual areas may be implemented in the brain and contribute to the attentional modulation of different measures of neural activity in visual cortices.

Oscillatory synchrony as a mechanism of attentional processing.

The question of how the brain selects which stimuli in our visual field will be given priority to enter into perception, to guide our actions and to form our memories has been a matter of intense research in studies of visual attention. Work in humans and animal models has revealed an extended network of areas involved in the control and maintenance of attention. For many years, imaging studies in humans constituted the main source of a systems level approach, while electrophysiological recordings in non-human primates provided insight into the cellular mechanisms of visual attention. Recent technological advances and the development of sophisticated analytical tools have allowed us to bridge the gap between the two approaches and assess how neuronal ensembles across a distributed network of areas interact in visual attention tasks. A growing body of evidence suggests that oscillatory synchrony plays a crucial role in the selective communication of neuronal populations that encode the attended stimuli. Here, we discuss data from theoretical and electrophysiological studies, with more emphasis on findings from humans and non-human primates that point to the relevance of oscillatory activity and synchrony for attentional processing and behavior. These findings suggest that oscillatory synchrony in specific frequencies reflects the biophysical properties of specific cell types and local circuits and allows the brain to dynamically switch between different spatio-temporal patterns of activity to achieve flexible integration and selective routing of information along selected neuronal populations according to behavioral demands. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Prediction and Attention.