Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio use in detecting bowel ischaemia in adhesional small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Bowel ischaemia significantly increases morbidity and mortality from adhesional small bowel obstruction. Current biomarkers and clinical parameters have poor predictive value for ischaemia. Our study investigated whether neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) could be used to predict bowel ischaemia in adhesional small bowel obstruction. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study collected clinical, biochemical and radiological data from patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction between 2017 and 2020 who underwent operative management. The presence or absence of bowel ischaemia/infarction was used to distinguish two populations. Biochemical markers on admission and immediately prior to operation were collected to give platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR0 and PLRPRE-OP , respectively) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR0 and NLRPRE-OP , respectively). SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) software was used for data analysis with Mann-Whitney U testing for continuous variables and Pearson Chi-square test for categorical variables. Sensitivity and specificity for PLR and NLR were calculated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients had intra-operative bowel ischaemia whilst the remaining 73 had no evidence of bowel ischaemia. Both median PLRPRE-OP and NLRPRE-OP were significantly higher in patients with bowel ischaemia compared to those without (PLRPRE-OP 272 [IQR 224-433] and 231 [IQR 146-295] respectively, P = 0.027; NLRPRE-OP 12.5 [IQR 8.6-21.3] v. 5.5 [IQR 3.5-10.2] respectively, P ≤ 0.001). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.762 for NLRPRE-OP , with a sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 63% for NLR 7.4. CONCLUSION: Raised NLR is predictive of bowel ischaemia in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its pharmacological prophylaxis in Asian general surgery patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition that has always been perceived to be rare in Asia. The aim of this systematic review was to gather the current available evidence on the incidence of VTE in this population. A secondary aim was to assess the efficacy of pharmacological prophylaxis, and hence determine its role, in the Asian population. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in June 2014. Articles found using search terms related to venous thromboembolism (VTE), Asian countries and general surgery procedures and pathologies were screened using the following inclusion criteria: (1) either the population studied was primarily Asian or the study was conducted in an Asian country, (2) the subjects studied underwent a major gastrointestinal or other general surgery procedure, (3) the primary outcome was the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE), and (4) secondary outcomes assessed included mortality and complications due to the VTE or prophylaxis against VTE. RESULTS: Fourteen publications with a total of 11,218 patients were analyzed. Nine of the fourteen were observational studies, with half being prospective in nature. There were five interventional studies of which two were randomized controlled trials. Among the observational studies, the median (range) incidence of above-knee DVT was 0.08 % (0-2.9 %), while the median (range) incidence of PE was 0.18 % (0-0.58 %). The rates of DVT in the control groups were reported to be between 0 and 7.4 %, while the incidence of PE in the control groups ranged from 0 to 1.9 %. Analysis of the comparative studies revealed that the incidence of bleeding-related complications varied from 0 to 18.1 % in the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) group compared to 0-7.5 % in the control group. The difference in minor bleeding complications between the LMWH group and the control group was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Data from this systematic review suggest that the risk of VTE in Asian general surgery patients is low, even in the context of risk factors typically regarded as high risk.