Stroke prevention in Europe: how are 11 European countries progressing toward the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations?

PURPOSE: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, although studies show that 90% of strokes can be prevented. The evidence base for stroke prevention is well established, and this study aimed to investigate how well European countries are adopting the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, particularly toward implementation of the recommended best practice in stroke prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a stroke prevention scorecard - populated with World Health Organization (WHO) data, secondary research, time-series data, and a survey of 550 physicians - to benchmark 11 European countries in the context of the ESC guidelines. RESULTS: All countries were found to have policies in place to manage general behavioral risk factors of noncommunicable disease (NCD), but we found that more needs to be done to address cardiovascular disease - specifically, stroke risk factors. Although ten of the countries in this study endorse the ESC cardiovascular clinical guidelines, implementation is lacking. Eight out of the 11 countries received the lowest score in regard to raising awareness around stroke, and 7 countries were found not to have a stroke registry. Among physicians surveyed in primary care it was reported that less than 30% of patients over 40 years old were screened for blood pressure, whereas even fewer were screened for atrial fibrillation; in 10 out of the 11 countries, less than 20% of patients over 65 years old were screened for atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: Although progress is being made in managing the burden of NCDs, our findings reveal opportunities for improvement in the primary prevention of stroke. Further developments in strategic planning, raising awareness, and monitoring disease are required, as is research on barriers to the implementation of best practice screening of blood pressure and atrial fibrillation in primary care.

Assessing the clinical and cost impact of on-demand immunoassay testing for the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic work-up for heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can take several days. Consequently patients may be speculatively switched onto replacement anticoagulant therapy before a diagnosis is confirmed. On-demand immunoassay diagnostic testing enables timely treatment decisions, based on test results. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and cost impact of the use of on-demand versus batched diagnostic tests for HIT. METHODS: Literature was reviewed to identify test performance, clinical and cost data. Semi-structured interviews (n=4) and a survey (n=90) provided insights into current practice and challenges. Flow diagram models were developed to estimate the potential impact of on-demand testing. RESULTS: Modelling estimated more HIT-related outcomes for patients maintained on heparin whilst awaiting test results and patients switched onto replacement anticoagulant therapy awaiting test results, compared with on-demand testing and treatment based on the results. The budget impact model estimated that on-demand testing reduced replacement anticoagulant therapy costs from $39,616 to $12,799 per patient. There are limitations to the data available to inform modelling and the estimates should be treated with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Using on-demand testing may drive positive effects on clinical and cost outcomes.