Next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling of matched tumor and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the presence of somatic mutations in matched tumor and circulating DNA (ctDNA) samples from patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and assess the association of changes in ctDNA levels with survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 62 patients with stage I-IVB HNSCC treated with surgery or radical chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. Plasma samples were obtained at baseline, at the end of treatment (EOT), and at disease progression. Tumor DNA was extracted from plasma (ctDNA) and tumor tissue (tDNA). The Safe Sequencing System was used assess the presence of pathogenic variants in four genes (TP53, CDKN2A, HRAS and PI3KCA) in both ctDNA and tDNA. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had available tissue and plasma samples. Concordance of genotyping results between tDNA and ctDNA at baseline was 53.3%. TP53 mutations were most commonly identified at baseline in both ctDNA (32.6%) and tDNA (40%). The presence of mutations in this restricted set of 4 genes in tissue samples at baseline was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) [median 58.3 months for patients with mutations vs. 89 months for patients without mutations, p < 0.013]. Similarly, patients presenting with mutations in ctDNA had shorter OS [median 53.8 vs. 78.6 months, p < 0.037]. CtDNA clearance at EOT did not show any association with PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Liquid biopsy enables real-time molecular characterization of HNSCC and might predict survival. Larger studies are needed to validate the utility of ctDNA as a biomarker in HNSCC.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in sarcoma treatment.

Sarcomas are a group of rare mesenchymal malignant tumors that arise from transformed cells of the mesenchymal connective tissue, which are challenging to treat. The majority of sarcomas are soft tissue sarcomas (STSs; 75%) and this heterogeneous group of tumors is further comprised of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (~15%) and bone sarcomas (10%). Although surgery remains the current primary therapeutic approach for localized disease, recurrent, metastatic and refractory sarcomas require cytotoxic chemotherapy, which usually yields poor results. Therefore the efficiency of sarcoma treatment imposes a difficult problem. Furthermore, even though progress has been made towards understanding the underlying molecular signaling pathways of sarcoma, there are limited treatment options. The aim of the present study was therefore to perform a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence regarding the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with recurrent or refractory STSs and bone sarcomas over the last two decades. Tyrosine kinases are principal elements of several intracellular molecular signaling pathways. Deregulation of these proteins has been implicated in driving oncogenesis via the crosstalk of pivotal cellular signaling pathways and cascades, including cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Subsequently, small molecule TKIs that target these proteins provide a novel potential therapeutic approach for several types of tumor by offering significant clinical benefits. Among the eligible articles, there were 45 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase II and non-randomized. Numerous studies have reported promising results regarding the use of TKIs, mainly resulting in disease control in patients with STSs. The lack of randomized clinical trials demonstrates the ambiguous efficiency of various studied treatment options, which therefore currently limits the approved drugs used in clinical practice. Research both in clinical and preclinical settings is needed to shed light on the underlying molecular drivers of sarcomagenesis and will identify novel therapeutic approaches for pretreated patients.

Systematic Review of Recurrent Osteosarcoma Systemic Therapy.

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary bone cancer, mainly affecting those of young ages. Although surgery combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy has significantly increased the chances of cure, recurrent and refractory disease still impose a tough therapeutic challenge. We performed a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence, regarding treatment of recurrent and/or refractory osteosarcoma over the last two decades. Among the 72 eligible studies, there were 56 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase I or II and non-randomized. Evaluated treatment strategies included cytotoxic chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase and mTOR inhibitors and other targeted agents, as well as immunotherapy and combinatorial approaches. Unfortunately, most treatments have failed to induce objective responses, albeit some of them may sustain disease control. No driver mutations have been recognized, to serve as effective treatment targets, and predictive biomarkers of potential treatment effectiveness are lacking. Hopefully, ongoing and future clinical and preclinical research will unlock the underlying biologic mechanisms of recurrent and refractory osteosarcoma, expanding the therapeutic choices available to pre-treated osteosarcoma patients.

Immunotherapy in Nonendemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Data from Two Nonendemic Regions.

BACKGROUND: nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a complex disease entity that mainly predominates in endemic regions. Real-world data with immunotherapy from nonendemic regions are limited. METHODS: we collected data from patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) NPC treated at a center in Greece and 8 centers in Italy. Between 2016 and 2021, 46 patients who were treated with at least one cycle of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were identified. Herein, we present our results and a review of the literature. RESULTS: assessment of response was available in 42 patients. Overall, 11 patients responded to immunotherapy (Overall Response Rate-ORR 26.2%). Three patients had complete response (CR), and 8 patients had partial response (PR). Disease control rate (DCR) was 61.9%. Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 5.6 months and median Overall Survival (OS) was 19.1 months. Responders to ICI improved PFS and OS as compared to that of nonresponders. A lower probability of responding to ICI was shown in patients with more than three metastatic sites (p = 0.073), metastatic disease at initial diagnosis, (p = 0.039) or EBV DNA positive before ICI initiation, (p = 0.074). Decline in EBV DNA levels was found to be statistically significant associated with best response to ICI (p = 0.049). Safety was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: among 46 patients with R/M NPC treated with immunotherapy in two nonendemic regions, ORR was 26.2% and durable responses were observed. Low disease burden could serve as a biomarker for response to ICI.

Association of autoimmunity with survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that occur as a consequence of enhanced immune response due to T-cell activation. The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the association between irAEs and disease outcome in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 89 patients with R/M HNSCC who were treated with nivolumab in our center from October 2015 to January 2020. Overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) were calculated from the date of nivolumab initiation or from the date of progression on nivolumab respectively to the date of death or censored at the last date of follow up. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (27%) developed irAEs, with more common thyroiditis (N = 13, 14.6%). ORR did not differ between patients with irAEs (29.2%) and patients without irAEs (21.9%, p = 0.576). Median PFS was similar between the two groups (3.1 months for patients with irAEs vs. 2.6 months for patients without irAEs, p = 0.412). Median OS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs (17.9 vs. 6.3 months in patients without irAEs, log-rank p = 0.004). Additionally, median PPS was significantly improved in patients who developed irAEs (10.2 months vs. 2.8 months for patients without irAEs, log-rank p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the development of irAEs and response to nivolumab were shown to be independent prognostic factors for favorable OS and PPS. CONCLUSIONS: The development of irAEs is a strong predictor of improved survival in patients with advanced HNSCC treated with nivolumab.