Decision making for oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: the ATA-AF study.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants offer the best long-term protection against ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are cumbersome to use and their prescription is far from guidelines recommendations. We report the results of a large survey on the attitudes of prescription of VKA in patients with AF. METHODS: 7148 patients were enrolled by 196 Internal Medicine (MED) and 164 Cardiology (CARD) centers, and VKA specifically analyzed. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks were evaluated by means of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scores, and a study-specific bleeding score (modified HAS-BLED). RESULTS: 63.9% of non-valvular patients had a CHADS2 score≥2 (MED: 75.3%-CARD: 53.1%), and 28.4% a bleeding score≥3 (41.9% MED-15.8% CARD). VKA were prescribed in 55.5% of non-valvular patients (46.3% MED and 64.2% CARD), in 81% of high-risk valvular patients and in 58.8% of the overall study population. Among patients at high risk of bleeding (score≥3), VKA were prescribed in 26.9% of subjects, while, in the subgroup at high risk of thrombosis (CHADS2 Score<2), these were prescribed in 54.4%. Age≥75, paroxysmal AF, cognitive impairment, need for assistance, CHADS2<2 and bleeding score≥3 were independent predictors of non-use of VKA. CONCLUSIONS: Oral anticoagulants are more frequently used in CARD than in MED, plausibly due to greater complexity of MED patients. Stratification of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk significantly drives the choice for VKA. However the fraction of patients in whom prescription or non-prescription is based on other individual characteristics is not negligible.

Current presentation and management of 7148 patients with atrial fibrillation in cardiology and internal medicine hospital centers: the ATA AF study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a high risk of stroke and mortality. AIMS: To describe the difference in AF management of patients (pts) referred to Cardiology (CARD) or Internal Medicine (MED) units in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: From May to July 2010, 360 centers enrolled 7148 pts (54% in CARD and 46% in MED). Median age was 77 years (IQR 70-83). Hypertension was the most prevalent associated condition, followed by hypercholesterolemia (28.9%), heart failure (27.7%) and diabetes (24.3%). MED pts were older, more frequently females and more often with comorbidities than CARD pts. In the 4845 pts with nonvalvular AF, a CHADS2 score ≥ 2 was present in 53.0% of CARD vs 75.3% of MED pts (p<.0001). Oral anticoagulants (OAC) were prescribed in 64.2% of CARD vs 46.3% of MED pts (p<.0001); OAC prescription rate was 49.6% in CHADS2 0 and 56.2% in CHADS2 score ≥ 2 pts. At the adjusted analysis patients managed in MED had a significantly lower probability to be treated with OAC. Rate control strategy was pursued in 51.4% of the pts (60.5% in MED and 43.6% in CARD) while rhythm control was the choice in 39.8% of CARD vs 12.9% of MED pts (p<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiologists and internists seem to manage pts with large epidemiological differences. Both CARD and MED specialists currently fail to prescribe OAC in accordance with stroke risk. Patients managed by MED specialists have a lower probability to receive an OAC treatment, irrespective of the severity of clinical conditions.