Objective predictors of response for staple versus laser emphysematous lung reduction.

Recently described surgical approaches to the treatment of emphysema, including buttressed stapled volume reduction and laser coagulation, are associated with variable clinical outcomes. We examined objective preoperative factors as predictors of response to treatment in patients enrolled in a randomized trial of staple versus laser volume-reduction surgery in order to help define patient selection criteria for these procedures. Seventy-two patients with severe symptomatic emphysema without bullae were entered into the protocol (39 staple, 33 laser). Preoperative objective variables (pulmonary function tests, smoking history, demographics, and graded chest computed tomographic [CT] scans) were evaluated as predictors of response to treatment (defined as a change in FEV1) at 3- to 6-mo follow-up, using linear and multivariate regression analysis. Follow-up pulmonary function was obtained on 90% of the 68 patients surviving at 6 mo. Overall improvement was significant only for staple-treated patients, and improved outcome correlated with greater smoking history and younger age for staple-treated patients. When physiologic variables were analyzed, greater smoking history, lower DL(CO), and younger age predicted improved outcome for laser-treated patients. Preoperative FEV1 and gas-exchange variables did not predict outcome in staple-treated patients. When CT scan grading was included in multivariate regression analysis, hyperinflation (increased thoracic gas volume) was the primary predictor of response for laser-treated patients. These findings suggest that younger patients with evidence of advanced emphysematous lung disease and hyperinflation are optimal candidates for lung-volume-reduction surgery, particularly by staple-reduction techniques. Additional studies with long-term follow-up, bilateral procedures, and assessment of other outcome measures must be performed to further define operative criteria for lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.

A randomized, prospective trial of stapled lung reduction versus laser bullectomy for diffuse emphysema.

Two procedures (laser bullectomy and lung reduction surgery with staples) are currently available for the surgical treatment of patients with diffuse emphysema. We compared the efficacy of these two surgical approaches in 72 patients, aged 67 +/- 7 years (mean +/- standard deviation), who had diffuse emphysema scored as severe on computed tomography and severe fixed expiratory airflow obstruction. The patients were prospectively randomized to undergo either neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet contact laser surgery (n = 33) or stapled lung reduction surgery (n = 39) by unilateral thoracoscopy. The operative mortalities were 0% and 2.5%, respectively. No significant differences were noted between the groups (p < 0.05) with respect to operating time, hospital days, or air leakage for more than 7 days. However, a delayed pneumothorax developed in six patients (18%) who had laser treatment (p = 0.005). The operations eliminated dependency on supplemental oxygen in 52% of the laser group and 87.5% of the stapled lung reduction group (p = 0.02). The mean postoperative improvement in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 6 months was significantly greater for the patients undergoing the staple technique (32.9% vs 13.4%, p = 0.01) than for the laser treatment group.