Screening of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumours in patients with MEN 1: multidetector-row computed tomography vs. endoscopic ultrasound.

PURPOSE: The authors compared multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the identification of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumours (PETs) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients (eight men and six women, aged 26-54 years) with MEN 1 underwent MDCT performed with a 4- (n=5) or 64- (n=9) detector-row system and EUS done with a radial transducer (7.5-20 MHz) within 7-28 days of each other. Prior to MDCT examination, patients were given 750 cc of water and asked to lie down in the right lateral decubitus for 15 min. Multiphase MDCT images were acquired both before and after the injection of nonionic iodinated contrast material (2 cc/kg) at an injection rate of 4 ml/s, with technical parameters and scan delay varying in relation to the system used. Images were all reconstructed at 3-mm intervals for the three phases (arterial, pancreatic and portal) and evaluated on a dedicated workstation. RESULTS: MDCT detected a total of 25 PETs (3-18 mm) in nine patients. Of these lesions, nine were situated within the duodenal wall and 16 in either the pancreatic head (n=3), body (n=7), or tail (n=6). Three additional lesions were detected retrospectively after EUS imaging. Most (18/22, 81%) were hypervascular nodules, and four appeared as either hypoattenuating or cystic lesions. EUS detected a total of 32 PETs (2-18 mm) in 11 patients. Most lesions (29/32, 90%) appeared hypoechoic and were situated in the duodenal wall (n=15) or in either the pancreatic head (n=10), body (n=6) or tail (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data indicate that MDCT is complementary to EUS in the identification of PETs in MEN-1 patients.

Screening of herbal constituents for aromatase inhibitory activity.

Random Forest screening of the phytochemical constituents of 240 herbs used in traditional Chinese medicine identified a number of compounds as potential inhibitors of the human aromatase enzyme (CYP19). Molecular modelling/docking studies indicated that three of these compounds (myricetin, liquiritigenin and gossypetin) would be likely to form stable complexes with the enzyme. The results of the virtual screening studies were subsequently confirmed experimentally, by in vitro (fluorimetric) assay of the compounds' inhibitory activity. The IC-50s for the flavones, myricetin and gossypetin were determined as 10 and 11 microM, respectively, whilst the flavanone, liquiritigenin, gave an IC-50 of 0.34 microM--showing about a 10-fold increase in potency, therefore, over the first generation aromatase inhibitor, aminoglutethimide.