Adding Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Vitamin D to Whey Protein Is More Effective than Protein Alone in Preserving Fat Free Mass and Muscle Strength in the First Month after Sleeve Gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most commonly performed weight loss (WL) bariatric procedures. The main goal of WL is reducing total body weight (TBW) and fat mass (FM). However, TBW loss is systematically accompanied by a decline in fat-free mass (FFM), predominantly in the first post-surgical month, despite protein supplementation. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and vitamin D seem to attenuate loss of FFM and, thus, reduce the decline in muscle strength (MS). However, data on the role of an integrated supplementation with whey protein plus BCAAs plus vitamin D (P+BCAAs+Vit.D) vs. protein alone on total weight loss (TWL), fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and (MS) in the first month after SG are lacking. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the impact of P+BCAAs+Vit.D vs. protein alone supplementation on TWL, FM, FFM, and MS in the first month after SG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before SG and at 1 month afterward, we prospectively measured and compared TBW, FM, FFM, and MS in 57 patients who received either a supplementation with P+BCAAs+Vit.D (n = 31) or protein alone (n = 26). The impact of P+BCAAs+Vit.D and protein alone supplementation on clinical status was also evaluated. RESULTS: Despite non-significant variation in TBW, FM decreased more significantly (18.5% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.023) with the P+BCAA+Vit.D supplementation compared to protein alone. Furthermore, the P+BCAA+Vit.D group showed a significantly lower decrease in FFM (4.1% vs. 11.4%, p < 0.001) and MS (3.8% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001) compared to the protein alone group. No significant alterations in clinical status were seen in either group. CONCLUSION: P+BCAA+Vit.D supplementation is more effective than protein alone in determining FM loss and is associated with a lower decrease in FFM and MS, without interfering with clinical status in patients 1 month after SG.

Cardiovascular Benefits and Lipid Profile Changes 5 Years After Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Study Between Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Visceral adipose tissue has been linked with cardiovascular events. Visceral adiposity index (VAI) is a routinely applicable tool for evaluation of visceral adipose dysfunction and linked to 10 year-cardiovascular risk. No previous studies have evaluated the changes over time of the VAI in patients who underwent different types of bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data of 42 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). VAI, lipid profile, and several anthropometric variables were measured before and after 5 years following surgery. RESULTS: During the studied time period, the BMI was similar between LSG and LRYGB patients (34.1 vs 31.6; p = 0.191), but the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) for LRYGB was significantly higher than LSG (31.3% vs 23.0%; p < 0.001). LRYGB patients had a significant improvement of all lipid parameters evaluated over time, while LSG patients experienced only a reduction in triglycerides (TG) levels and an increase in HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). VAI values were similar in the two groups at baseline as well at the last follow-up point (5-year VAI, LSG: 0.93, RYGB: 0.93; p = 0.951). At multivariate regression analysis, 5-year-%TWL was the only independent predictor of a greater amount of VAI reduction over time. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery, independent of the type of surgical procedure, decreases the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks due to weight loss and improvement of lipid parameters. VAI could be a useful tool to better identify eligible patients for bariatric surgery and to determine the success of surgery.

Mendelian non-syndromic obesity.

Obesity is highly heritable and arises from the interplay of many genes and environmental factors. It can be defined as the result of prolonged imbalance between calorie intake and energy utilization. About 5% of cases of non-syndromic obesity are monogenic (Mendelian obesity). The amount of adipose tissue in the body is mainly regulated by leptin, a hormone produced by adipocytes, and Mendelian obesity is mainly caused by mutations that disrupt the leptin/melanocortin pathway. In this article, we summarize the genes involved in genetic obesity and the test we use for genetic analysis.

Effects of a Low FODMAP Diet and Specific Carbohydrate Diet on Symptoms and Nutritional Adequacy of Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Preliminary Results of a Single-blinded Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IBS is the most common functional disease of the low gastrointestinal tract. Recently, the interest towards a diet approach has increased, for example, a diet with low content of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of a low FODMAP diet and a specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) conducted for 3 months on symptoms and to evaluate the deficiencies of vitamin D and folic acid in patients affected by IBS, matching the Rome IV criteria. METHODS: We evaluated 73 patients divided into 2 groups: one submitted to low FODMAP diet and one to SCD, for 3 months. Patients were assigned to one of the 2 groups randomly and blinded. All the patients filled a visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate the severity of symptoms and a diary to evaluate the number of days with symptoms, and this was repeated after 3 months. Final evaluation was made by a blinded investigator. RESULTS: In the end, the patients with low FODMAP diet had a significant improvement in bloating and distension (P = 0.000); the group with SCD instead had a low but not a significant improvement. One way ANOVA showed comparable severity of symptoms in the 2 groups pre-diet (P = 0.215), but a difference in the same symptoms after 12 days (P = 0.000). Tukey test showed a significant improvement in the low FODMAP diet group and only a trend of improvement in the second group of SCD. The vitamin D mean value in both groups at the time of enrollment was 38 ng/mL; in the end, the mean value in the low FODMAP diet group was 32 ng/mL and in the SCD group was 22 ng/mL, with a statistically significant difference. The folic acid mean value at the time of enrollment was 18 mg/dL; in the end, the mean value in the low FODMAP diet group was 15 mg/dL and in the SCD group was 8 mg/dL, with a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Patients affected by IBS seem to have benefitted from a low FODMAP diet but not from an SCD, and a low FODMAP diet doesn't seem to cause vitamin D and folic acid deficiencies.