RESUMO
Although the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is essentially clinical, the implementation of imaging techniques can improve diagnostic accuracy. While some techniques (e.g. magnetic resonance imaging-MRI, computerized tomography-CT) are used to exclude secondary syndromes, presynaptic dopaminergic imaging including imaging of dopamine transporter (DAT)-can help the Neurologist in the differential diagnosis between neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndromes and parkinsonism without dopamine deficiency. DAT imaging can be useful in cases in which the clinical picture is not univocal, as in case of overlapping clinical features in patients with early disease, atypical syndromes or unsatisfying response to therapy. Currently, (123I)FP-CIT ([123I]N-ω-fluoropropyl-2ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane) (trade name DaTSCAN) is the only agent approved by international regulatory agencies for this purpose. With the increasing use of this technique, some unexpected findings have been reported, including patients clinically diagnosed with PD with a normal SPECT scan [e.g. Scans Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit (SWEDD)]; PD patients with a greater dopaminergic deficit in the striatum ipsilateral to the clinically more affected side [e.g. Scans With Ipsilateral Dopaminergic Deficit (SWIDD)]; as well as some artifacts. Moreover, the neurologist must remember that structural lesions and administration of some drugs might alter the result of DAT imaging. Unexpected findings, artifacts, and misinterpretation of imaging findings can lead to an erroneous diagnosis and inappropriate therapy, neglect of other medical conditions that might explain the clinical picture, and undermine the selection phase in clinical trials. The aim of the present review is to bring clarity on these controversial (and sometimes erroneous) results, in order to inform of these possibilities the clinicians requesting a DaTSCAN in clinical practice.
