The value of interventional radiology in clinical trial teams: experience from the BATTLE lung cancer trials.

AIM: To report on the multidisciplinary approach, focusing specifically on the role of the interventional radiologist (IR), used to support the Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) and BATTLE-2 trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided biopsy for the BATTLE and BATTLE-2 trials were reviewed. A radiology-based, three-point, lesion-scoring system was developed and used by two IRs. Lesions were given a score of 3 (most likely to yield sufficient material for biomarker analysis) if they met the following criteria: size >2 cm, solid mass, demonstrated imaging evidence of viability, and were technically easy to sample. Lesions not meeting all four criteria were scored 2 with the missing criteria noted as negative factors. Lesions considered to have risks that outweighed potential benefits receive a score of 1 and were not biopsied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the score's ability to predict successful yield for biomarker adequacy. RESULTS: A total of 555 biopsies were performed. The overall yield for analysis of the required biomarkers was 86.1% (478/555), and 84% (268/319) and 88.9% (210/236) for BATTLE and BATTLE-2, respectively (p=0.09). Lesions receiving a score of 3 were adequate for biomarker analysis in 89% of cases. Lesions receiving a score of 2 with more than two negative factors were adequate for molecular analysis in 69.2% (IR1, p=0.03) and 74% (IR2, p=0.04) of cases. The two IRs scored 78.4% of the lesions the same indicating moderate agreement (kappa=0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48, 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: IRs add value to clinical trial teams by optimising lesions selected for biopsy and biomarker analysis.

Osimertinib versus platinum-pemetrexed for patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC and progression on a prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: AURA3 overall survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: In AURA3 (NCT02151981), osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved response in patients with EGFR T790M advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and progression on prior EGFR-TKI treatment. We report the final AURA3 overall survival (OS) analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients were randomized 2 : 1 to osimertinib (80 mg orally, once daily) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin/cisplatin (platinum-pemetrexed) intravenously, every 3 weeks (≤6 cycles). Patients could crossover to osimertinib on progression confirmed by blinded independent central review. OS and safety were secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib and 140 to platinum-pemetrexed (136 received treatment). At data cut-off (DCO; 15 March 2019), 188 patients (67%) receiving osimertinib versus 93 (66%) receiving platinum-pemetrexed had died. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.12; P = 0.277]; the median OS was 26.8 months (95% CI 23.5-31.5) versus 22.5 months (95% CI 20.2-28.8) for osimertinib and platinum-pemetrexed, respectively. The estimated 24- and 36-month survival was 55% versus 43% and 37% versus 30%, respectively. After crossover adjustment, there was an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.18-1.6). Time to first subsequent therapy or death showed a clinically meaningful advantage toward osimertinib (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16-0.28; P < 0.001). At DCO, 99/136 (73%) patients in the platinum-pemetrexed arm had crossed over to osimertinib, 66/99 (67%) of whom had died. The most common adverse events possibly related to study treatment were diarrhea (32%; grade ≥3, 1%) and rash (grouped term; 32%; grade ≥3, <1%) in the osimertinib arm, versus nausea (47%; grade ≥3, 3%) in the platinum-pemetrexed arm. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T790M advanced NSCLC, no statistically significant benefit in OS was observed for osimertinib versus platinum-pemetrexed, which possibly reflects the high crossover rate of patients from platinum-pemetrexed to osimertinib. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02151981; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02151981.

Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, cetuximab, and cetuximab, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by local therapy in previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The survival advantage of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by locoregional treatment is controversial in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We previously showed feasibility and safety of cetuximab-based IC (paclitaxel/carboplatin/cetuximab-PCC, and docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/cetuximab-C-TPF) followed by local therapy in LAHNSCC. The primary end point of this phase II clinical trial with randomization to PCC and C-TPF followed by combined local therapy in patients with LAHNSCC stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status and T-stage was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) compared with historical control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥18 years with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx with measurable stage IV (T0-4N2b-2c/3M0) and known HPV by p16 status. Stratification was by HPV and T-stage into one of the two risk groups: (i) low-risk: HPV-positive and T0-3 or HPV-negative and T0-2; (ii) intermediate/high-risk: HPV-positive and T4 or HPV-negative and T3-4. Patient reported outcomes were carried out. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were randomized in the study, 68 to each arm. With a median follow up of 3.2 years, the 2-year PFS in the PCC arm was 89% in the overall, 96% in the low-risk and 67% in the intermediate/high-risk groups; in the C-TPF arm 2-year PFS was 88% in the overall, 88% in the low-risk and 89% in the intermediate/high-risk groups. CONCLUSION: The observed 2-year PFS of PCC in the low-risk group and of C-TPF in the intermediate/high-risk group showed a 20% improvement compared with the historical control derived from RTOG-0129, therefore reaching the primary end point of the trial.

Comprehensive evaluation of published gene expression prognostic signatures for biomarker-based lung cancer clinical studies.

Background: A more accurate prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients could aid in the identification of patients at high risk for recurrence. Many NSCLC mRNA expression signatures claiming to be prognostic have been reported in the literature. The goal of this study was to identify the most promising mRNA prognostic signatures in NSCLC for further prospective clinical validation. Experimental design: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of published mRNA prognostic signatures for resected NSCLC. The prognostic performance of each signature was evaluated via a meta-analysis of 1927 early stage NSCLC patients collected from 15 studies using three evaluation metrics (hazard ratios, concordance scores, and time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves). The performance of each signature was then evaluated against 100 random signatures. The prognostic power independent of clinical risk factors was assessed by multivariate Cox models. Results: Through a literature search, we identified 42 lung cancer prognostic signatures derived from genome-wide expression profiling analysis. Based on meta-analysis, 25 signatures were prognostic for survival after adjusting for clinical risk factors and 18 signatures carried out significantly better than random signatures. When analyzing histology types separately, 17 signatures and 8 signatures are prognostic for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer, respectively. Despite little overlap among published gene signatures, the top-performing signatures are highly concordant in predicted patient outcomes. Conclusions: Based on this large-scale meta-analysis, we identified a set of mRNA expression prognostic signatures appropriate for further validation in prospective clinical studies.

Phase II trial of everolimus and erlotinib in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is one of the key adaptive changes accounting for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-resistant growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We designed a phase II clinical trial of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), erlotinib, in association with the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, based on the hypothesis that the downstream effects of Akt through inhibition of mTOR may enhance the effectiveness of the EGFR-TKI in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed platinum-resistant HNSCC received everolimus 5 mg and erlotinib 150 mg daily orally until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, investigator or patient decision. Cytokines and angiogenic factors profile, limited mutation analysis and p16 immunohistochemistry status were included in the biomarker analysis. RESULTS: Of the 35 assessable patients, 3 (8%) achieved partial response at 4 weeks, 1 confirmed at 12 weeks; overall response rate at 12 weeks was 2.8%. Twenty-seven (77%) patients achieved disease stabilization at 4 weeks, 11 (31%) confirmed at 12 weeks. Twelve-week progression-free survival (PFS) was 49%, median PFS 11.9 weeks and median overall survival (OS) 10.25 months. High neutrophil gelatinase lipocalin (P = 0.01) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (P = 0.04) plasma levels were significantly associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of erlotinib and everolimus did not show significant benefit in unselected patients with platinum-resistant metastatic HNSCC despite a manageable toxicity profile. Markers of tumor invasion and hypoxia identify a group of patients with particularly poor prognosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00942734.

Innovative Clinical Trials: The LUNG-MAP Study.

Although the proportion of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung has declined over the last two decades, the disease is still fatal for tens of thousands of patients each year. The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has advanced rapidly over the past decade, providing novel, targeted therapeutic options to patients, but has mostly been limited to the adenocarcinoma histology. Efforts are currently underway to bring squamous cell carcinoma of the lung into this new era of targeted therapy. This article reviews the rationale and trial design for the "LUNG-MAP: S1400 Phase II/III Biomarker-Driven Master Protocol for Second Line Therapy of Squamous Cell Lung Cancer" study. This multi-institutional, multi-cooperative group trial aims to individualize treatment for patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to one of five arms based on the genomic profile of the tumor. The goal of this clinical trial is to rapidly identify new active drugs and bring them as soon as possible through a registration process for patients with squamous cell lung cancer by utilizing a novel trial design and involving all key stakeholders in drug development in a national effort. This could serve as a paradigm for drug development for malignancies with wide molecular heterogeneity.

Phase II study of everolimus-erlotinib in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggest combining a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with erlotinib could provide synergistic antitumor effects in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC that progressed after one to two previous chemotherapy regimens were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib 150 mg/day±everolimus 5 mg/day. Primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR) at 3 months; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients received everolimus-erlotinib (n=66) or erlotinib alone (n=67). The DCR at 3 months was 39.4% and 28.4%, respectively. The probability for the difference in disease control at 3 months to be ≥15% was estimated to be 29.8%, which was below the prespecified probability threshold of ≥40%. Median PFS was 2.9 and 2.0 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 72.7% and 32.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 stomatitis was observed in 31.8% of combination therapy recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus 5 mg/day plus erlotinib 150 mg/day was not considered sufficiently efficacious per the predefined study criteria. The combination does not warrant further investigation based on increased toxicity and the lack of substantial improvement in disease stabilization.

Efficacy of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy alone or with chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are scarce in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. RAD001, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has shown phase I efficacy in NSCLC. METHODS: Stage IIIb or IV NSCLC patients, with two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens, one platinum based (stratum 1) or both chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (stratum 2), received RAD001 10 mg/day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective was overall response rate (ORR). Analyses of markers associated with the mTOR pathway were carried out on archival tumor from a subgroup using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and direct mutation sequencing. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were enrolled, 42 in stratum 1 and 43 in stratum. ORR was 4.7% (7.1% stratum 1; 2.3% stratum 2). Overall disease control rate was 47.1%. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 (stratum 1) and 2.7 months (stratum 2). Common > or =grade 3 events were fatigue, dyspnea, stomatitis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Pneumonitis, probably or possibly related, mainly grade 1/2, occurred in 25%. Cox regression analysis of IHC scores found that only phospho AKT (pAKT) was a significant independent predictor of worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS: RAD001 10 mg/day was well tolerated, showing modest clinical activity in pretreated NSCLC. Evaluation of RAD001 plus standard therapy for metastatic NSCLC continues.

Randomized phase III study of chemoradiation with or without amifostine for patients with favorable performance status inoperable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results.

A prospective randomized study was conducted to determine whether amifostine (Ethyol) reduces the rate of severe esophagitis and hematologic and pulmonary toxicity associated with chemoradiation or improves control of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty patients with inoperable stage II or III NSCLC were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Both groups received thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with 1.2 Gy/fraction, 2 fraction per day, 5 days per week for a total dose 69.6 Gy. All patients received oral etoposide (VP-16), 50 mg Bid, 30 minutes before TRT beginning day 1 for 10 days, repeated on day 29, and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8, 29, and 36. Patients in the study group received amifostine, 500 mg intravenously, twice weekly before chemoradiation (arm 1); patients in the control group received chemoradiation without amifostine (arm 2). Patient and tumor characteristics were distributed equally in both groups. Of the 60 patients enrolled, 53 were evaluable (27 in arm 1, 26 in arm 2) with a median follow-up of 6 months. Median survival times were 26 months for arm 1 and 15 months for arm 2, not statistically significantly different. Morphine intake to reduce severe esophagitis was significantly lower in arm 1 (2 of 27, 7.4%) than arm 2 (8 of 26, 31%; P =.03). Acute pneumonitis was significantly lower in arm 1 (1 of 27, 3.7%) than in arm 2 (6 of 26, 23%; P =.037). Hypotension (20 mm Hg decrease from baseline blood pressure) was significantly more frequent in arm 1 (19 of 27, 70%) than arm 2 (1 of 26, 3.8%; P =.0001). Only 1 patient discontinued treatment because of hypotension. These preliminary results showed that amifostine significantly reduced acute severe esophagitis and pneumonitis. Further observation is required to assess long-term efficacy.

Cyclin D1 and p16 alterations in advanced premalignant lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract: role in response to chemoprevention and cancer development.

PURPOSE: To better understand the role of G(1)-S transition regulator abnormalities in the pathogenesis of advanced premalignant lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract and the biological effects of chemoprevention, we studied biopsies obtained sequentially from participants in a prospective trial using 13-cis retinoic acid, IFN-alpha, and alpha-tocopherol for 12 months. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cyclin D1 and p16 expression were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, loss of heterozygosity by polymerase chain reacting amplification, and then electrophoretic separation of the products, methylation of the p16 promoter by methylation-specific polymerase chain reacting, and cyclin D1 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Baseline dysregulation of cyclin D1 expression was found in 50% (14 of 28) and was reversed in 6 of 14 cases, whereas p16 expression was lost in 46% (13 of 28) and regained in 2 of 13 cases. Loss of heterozygosity at 9p21 occurred in 68% and p16(INK4a) promoter methylation occurred in 75% of cases, with increasing frequency from mild to severe dysplasia. Cyclin D1 gene amplification was identified in two cases. Cyclin D1 protein dysregulation at last follow-up alone and in combination with p16 loss was associated with histological progression and cancer development (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Additional study of these alterations in a larger sample and exploration of the upstream signaling partners of these cell cycle regulators in vivo is warranted to identify cancer risk profiles that would be meaningful targets for chemopreventive intervention.

Combined interferon-alfa, 13-cis-retinoic acid, and alpha-tocopherol in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: novel bioadjuvant phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Retinoids and interferons (IFNs) have single-agent and synergistic combined effects in modulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in vitro and clinical activity in vivo in the head and neck and other sites. Alpha-tocopherol has chemopreventive activity in the head and neck and may decrease 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cRA) toxicity. We designed the present phase II adjuvant trial to prevent recurrence or second primary tumors (SPTs) using 13-cRA, IFN-alpha, and alpha-tocopherol in locally advanced-stage head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After definitive local treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, or both, patients with locally advanced SCCHN were treated with 13-cRA (50 mg/m(2)/d, orally, daily), IFN-alpha (3 x 10(6) IU/m(2), subcutaneous injection, three times a week), and alpha-tocopherol (1,200 IU/d, orally, daily) for 12 months, with a dose modification. Screening for recurrence or SPTs was performed every 3 months. RESULTS: Tumors of 11 (24%) of the 45 treated patients were stage III, and 34 (76%) were stage IV. Thirty-eight (86%) of 44 patients completed the full 12-month treatment (doses modified as needed). Toxicity generally was consistent with previous IFN and 13-cRA reports and included mild to moderate mucocutaneous and flu-like symptoms; occasional significant fatigue (grade 3 in 7% of patients), mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia in 30% of patients who continued treatment along with antilipid therapy, and mild hematologic side effects. Six patients did not complete the planned treatment because of intolerable toxicity or social problems. At a median 24-months of follow-up, our clinical end point rates were 9% for local/regional recurrence (four patients), 5% for local/regional recurrence and distant metastases (two patients), and 2% for SPT (one patient), which was acute promyelocytic leukemia (ie, not of the upper aerodigestive tract). Median 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival were 98% and 91%, respectively, and of disease-free survival were 91% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The novel biologic agent combination of IFN-alpha, 13-cRA, and alpha-tocopherol was generally well tolerated and promising as adjuvant therapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. We are currently conducting a phase III randomized study of this combination (v no treatment) to confirm these phase II study results.

[Biomarkers of carcinogenesis of the upper and lower airway epithelium and the role of chemoprevention]. / Biomarqueurs de carcinogenèse des voies aériennes et place de la chimioprévention.

Lung as well as head and neck cancer represent an important public health problem worldwide, with lung cancer being the leading cause of cancer death in western countries. Although early stage disease is often curable with surgery or radiotherapy, the majority of patients present with advanced disease in which despite advances in combined modality therapy the outcomes have not dramatically improved. Furthermore, patients cured of their initial early stage lung or head and neck carcinoma are at high risk for development of second primary tumors, which pose the main threat to their survival. An alternative approach in reducing the incidence and thus mortality of these cancers is chemoprevention, the use of agents to reverse, halt or delay carcinogenesis. The carcinogenesis process in lung and head and neck cancer results from a dysregulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation and cell death resulting from field-wide exposure of the upper and lower airway track to tobacco smoking. This review article presents main data regarding the actual understanding of lung and head and neck carcinogenesis, as well as results of major chemoprevention trials in this field.

Phase II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the current study the authors assessed the antitumor activity (including response rate, duration of response, and survival) and toxicity profile (including anorexia, fatigue, emesis, and peripheral neuropathy) of a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin (TIC) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The trial hypothesis was that the TIC therapeutic index would be as high as that of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) in this setting, but with less toxicity. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN were treated with 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion on Day 1, 1000 mg/m(2) of ifosfamide as a 2-hour infusion on Days 1-3, 600 mg/m(2) of mesna on Days 1-3, and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6) as a 30-minute infusion on Day 1; the regimen was repeated every 3-4 weeks. All patients were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine before paclitaxel infusion. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not given. RESULTS: Among 56 patients entered onto the study, 55 patients were analyzed for survival rates (locoregional recurrence alone in 56% of patients and distant metastasis with or without locoregional recurrence in 44% of patients). Fifty-four patients were evaluable for tumor response and toxicity. A total of 32 patients (59%) had disease that responded to treatment; the complete response rate was 17% (9 of 54 patients). The median duration of the responses was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.4-7.8 months) and that of complete responses was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 months to date of last follow-up). The median duration of follow-up care in all patients was 13.5 months. The median survival time for all patients was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-12.2 months). The regimen was well tolerated. Neutropenic fever developed in 30% of the patients; 1 patient died of neutropenia and sepsis. Other toxic effects included Grade 2-3 anorexia in 13% of patients, Grade 2-3 weight loss in 11% of patients, Grade 2-3 fatigue in 27% of patients, Grade 2-3 nausea/emesis in 13% of patients, and Grade 2-3 peripheral neuropathy in 9% of patients (toxicity grading based on the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria). Red blood cell and platelet transfusions were required in 13% and 7% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TIC regimen had high antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, with a 59% major response rate (17% complete response rate with relatively durable complete responses). Neutropenic fever developed in 30% of the patients, the incidence of which might have been decreased by prophylactic antibiotics or hematopoietic growth factor support. Other toxic effects included significantly lower rates and less severe instances of anorexia, emesis, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy than those reported with the previously studied TIP regimen. The TIC regimen currently is being studied as an induction chemotherapy regimen in previously untreated patients with locally advanced SCCHN. The activity of TIC (a novel paclitaxel and ifosfamide-based regimen) in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN should be confirmed in a Phase III randomized trial.

Biomolecular markers as intermediate end points in chemoprevention trials of upper aerodigestive tract cancer.

Head-and-neck squamous-cell cancer (HNSCC) is an important public-health problem, accounting for approximately 40,300 new cancer cases and 12,000 cancer deaths annually in the United States (Greenlee et al., [2000]). Patients with early-stage disease are often cured with surgery or radiotherapy but are at high risk for second primary tumor (SPT) development (Lippman and Hong, [1989]), and the majority of patients present with advanced disease, for which the outcomes have not markedly improved despite advances in combined-modality therapy (Vokes et al., [1993]). HNSCC arises from transformation of the genetic material of normal cells, followed by successive genetic alterations in a multistep fashion, leading to clonal evolution of progeny cells with a proliferative advantage (Vogelstein and Kinzler, [1993]), induced by tobacco carcinogens (Slaughter et al., [1953]). Chemoprevention aims at reversal of this process through re-regulation of growth and differentiation and possibly elimination of genetically and phenotypically aberrant clones. Chemoprevention studies in upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancers are based on these fundamental premises and the identification of molecular genetic and biologic cellular changes. These alterations represent biomarkers of the carcinogenesis process and ultimately, if validated, could serve as intermediate end points for these studies.

Carcinogenesis of head and neck cancer and the role of chemoprevention in its reversal.

Head and neck cancer is an important public health problem worldwide, accounting for approximately 40,400 new cancer cases and 12,300 cancer deaths annually in the US. Although early-stage disease is often curable with surgery or radiotherapy, the majority of patients present with advanced disease in which despite advances in combined modality therapy the outcomes have not dramatically improved. Furthermore, patients cured of their initial early-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are at high risk for development of second primary tumors, which pose the main threat to survival. An alternative approach in reducing the incidence and thus mortality associated with these cancers is chemoprevention, the use of agents to reverse, halt, or delay carcinogenesis. The carcinogenesis process in head and neck cancer results from a dysregulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and cell death resulting from field-wide exposure of the upper aerodigestive tract to tobacco smoking. Newly acquired knowledge in the field of tumor biology and of the genetic changes underlying carcinogenesis through the use of new molecular technology represents the basis on which chemoprevention efforts should be based.

Predicting cancer development in oral leukoplakia: ten years of translational research.

Our 10-year translational study of the oral premalignant lesion (OPL) model has advanced the basic understanding of carcinogenesis. Although retinoids have established activity in this model, a substantial percentage of our OPL patients progress to cancer, especially after treatment is stopped. On the basis of our 10-year OPL study, we have developed the first comprehensive tool for assessing cancer risk of OPL patients. This cancer risk assessment tool incorporates medical/demographic variables, epidemiological factors, and cellular and molecular biomarkers. Between 1988 and 1991, 70 advanced OPL patients were enrolled in a chemoprevention trial of induction with high dose isotretinoin (1.5 mg/kg/day for 3 months) followed by 9 months of maintenance treatment with either low dose isotretinoin (0.5 mg/kg/day) or beta-carotene (30 mg/d; total treatment duration, 1 year). We assessed the relationship between cancer risk factors and time to cancer development by means of exploratory data analysis, logrank test, Cox proportional hazard model, and recursive partitioning. With a median follow-up of 7 years, 22 of our 70 patients (31.4%) developed cancers in the upper aerodigestive tract following treatment. The overall cancer incidence was 5.7% per year. The most predictive factors of cancer risk are OPL histology, cancer history, and three of the five biomarkers we assessed (chromosomal polysomy, p53 protein expression, and loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 3p or 9p). In the multivariable Cox model, histology (P = 0.0003) and the combined biomarker score of chromosomal polysomy, p53, and loss of heterozygosity (P = 0.0008) are the strongest predictors for cancer development. Retinoic acid receptor beta and micronuclei were not associated with increased cancer risk. We have demonstrated a successful strategy of comprehensive cancer risk assessment in OPL patients. Combining conventional medical/demographic variables and a panel of three biomarkers can identify high risk patients in our sample. This result will need to be validated by future studies. With the identification of high risk individuals, more efficient chemoprevention trials and molecular targeting studies can be designed.

Biochemoprevention for dysplastic lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and secondarily the toxic effects of biochemopreventive therapy (high-dose isotretinoin [13-cis-retinoic acid], alpha-tocopherol, and interferon alfa) in the reversal of advanced premalignant lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract and to correlate the therapeutic events with modulation of biomarkers. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized chemoprevention trial. SETTING: Tertiary cancer care referral center and ambulatory care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six patients with advanced premalignant lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract, without cancer during the 2 years before the intervention, with evaluable lesions, and without retinoid therapy for 3 months before the trial. INTERVENTION: Administration of oral isotretinoin (100 mg/m2 per day), oral alpha-tocopherol (1200 IU/d), and subcutaneous interferon alfa (3 megaunits per square meter twice weekly) for 12 months, with serial biopsies and clinical examination at 0, 6, 12, and 18 months from study start. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and histologic responses to the intervention. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients, evaluation was possible in 30 for response at 6 months and in 21 at 12 months. At 6 months, there were 10 pathologic complete responses and 7 partial responses; at 12 months, 7 complete and 3 partial responses. A striking difference in response was observed in favor of laryngeal lesions (9/19 [47%] complete response rate at 6 months and 7/14 [50%] at 12 months vs 1/11 [9%] and 0/7 [0%], respectively, for oral lesions). Toxic effects were acceptable and did not exceed grade 3. CONCLUSION: Biochemoprevention is a promising biologic approach for laryngeal dysplasia and needs to be investigated further.