Pericardial Effusion After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Timing, Predictors, and Clinical Impact.

BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusion (PE) is the most common serious left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) complication, but its mechanisms, time course, and prognostic impact are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the frequency, timing, predictors and clinical impact of PE after LAAC. METHODS: Data on consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous LAAC between 2009 and 2022 were prospectively collected including the 1-year follow-up. Both single (Watchman 2.5/FLX, Boston Scientific) and double (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Amulet, St. Jude Medical/Abbott) LAAC devices were used. An imaging core laboratory adjudicated the PEs and categorized them as early (≤7 days) and late (8-365 days). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of early and overall PE. RESULTS: Of 1,023 attempted LAAC procedures, PE was observed in 44 (4.3%) patients; PE was categorized as early in 34 (3.3%) and late in 10 (0.9%) patients. The majority of PEs occurred within 6 hours after LAAC (n = 25, 56.8%) and were clinically relevant (n = 28, 63.6%). Independent predictors of early PE were double-closure left atrial appendage devices (adjusted OR: 8.20; 95% CI: 1.09-61.69), female sex (adjusted OR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.50-7.73), the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) at baseline (adjusted OR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.11-6.09), and advanced age (adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.23), whereas female sex and OAC at baseline remained independent predictors of overall PE. CONCLUSIONS: In this large LAAC registry, PE was observed in <1 in 20 patients and usually occurred within 6 hours after procedure. The majority of early PEs were clinically relevant and occurred in the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet procedures. Independent predictors included the use of double-closure devices, female sex, OAC at baseline, and advanced age. (LAAC-registry: Clinical Outcome After Echocardiography-guided LAA-closure; NCT04628078).

Aortic Valve Planimetry in Aortic Stenosis Quantification: Reliability of Three-Dimensional-Multiplane Reconstruction and Comparison With Established Methods.

We aim to evaluate the reliability and consistency of measuring the aortic valve area (AVA) using 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography and compare it with invasive and noninvasive methods using a continuity equation (CE). Measurements were taken from 119 patients with different severity of aortic stenosis and with normal aortic valve who underwent elective transesophageal echocardiography encompassing the whole spectrum of aortic opening. Three methods were compared to determine AVA. First, the effective AVA was calculated with the standard CE, where the left ventricular outflow tract area was calculated from its 2-dimensional diameter (AVA-CEstd). Second, a modified CE method (AVA-CEmod) was used, in which the left ventricular outflow tract area was measured using 3D-multiplane reconstruction. Third, the geometric AVA was directly measured using 3D-multiplane reconstruction planimetry (AVA-3D). Interobserver and intraobserver variability were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The values were measured by two blinded readers for interobserver variability and by one observer on the same dataset. AVA-3D was significantly larger than AVA-CEmod and AVA-CEstd (1.87 ± 1.00 cm2 vs 1.81 ± 0.92 cm2 p = 0.03 and 1.87 ± 1.00 cm2 vs 1.71 ± 0.85 cm2 p <0.001). However, in the subset of patients with AVA-3D <1.5 cm2, there was no significant difference between AVA-3D and AVA-CEmod (1.06 ± 0.24 vs 1.08 ± 0.26 cm2, paired t test: t = 0.77, degree of freedom = 58, p = 0.44). The ICC between the measurements of AVA-3D and AVA-CEmod (ICC 0.979), and AVA-3D and AVA- CEstd (ICC 0.940), were excellent. AVA-3D delivers very similar results as compared with more established echocardiographic parameters. The difference between effective and geometric AVA did not appear to be clinically relevant in patients with a higher degree of stenosis.

Acute Coronary Occlusion in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: According to current guidelines, hemodynamic status should guide the decision between immediate and delayed coronary angiography (CAG) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients without ST-segment elevation. A delayed strategy is advised in hemodynamically stable patients, and an immediate approach is recommended in unstable patients. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the frequency, predictors, and clinical impact of acute coronary occlusion in hemodynamically stable and unstable OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation. METHODS: Consecutive unconscious OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation who were undergoing CAG at Bern University Hospital (Bern, Switzerland) between 2011 and 2019 were included. Frequency and predictors of acute coronary artery occlusions and their impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 386 patients, 169 (43.8%) were hemodynamically stable. Acute coronary occlusions were found in 19.5% of stable and 24.0% of unstable OHCA patients (P = 0.407), and the presence of these occlusions was predicted by initial chest pain and shockable rhythm, but not by hemodynamic status. Acute coronary occlusion was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted HR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.22-6.15) but not of all-cause death (adjusted HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.44-1.18). Hemodynamic instability was not predictive of fatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Acute coronary artery occlusions were found in 1 in 5 OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation. The frequency of these occlusions did not differ between stable and unstable patients, and the occlusions were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death. In OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation, chest pain or shockable rhythm rather than hemodynamic status identifies patients with acute coronary occlusion.

Evidence for a sigmoidal flow-to-valve opening relation in low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.

We analyzed the relationship between flow (Q) and aortic valve opening area (AVA) using a sequence of echocardiographic stress tests of increasing strength. Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has been used to differentiate pseudo-severe from true severe aortic stenoses. Because the Q-response to DSE is so variable between individuals, AVA has been projected to a standardized flow (AVAproj) using linear interpolation. A linear Q-to-AVA relation implies that AVA shows an unconstrained increase. We applied three stress maneuvers of increasing strength to investigate whether AVA shows signs of saturation. We performed an echocardiographic examination at rest, during the passive leg raise maneuver ("PLR"), maximal dobutamine infusion ("Dmax"), and their combination ("Dmax + PLR") in 45 patients with severe low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. We analyzed the effect of the stress maneuver on Q, AVA, valve compliance (VC), and AVAproj. We also compared the proportion of patients with nonconclusive test (ΔQ < 20%) between stress maneuvers. We computed the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to compare a linear with a saturating function for the Q-AVA relation. Q gradually increased from "PLR" to "Dmax" to "Dmax + PLR" (P < 0.0001), whereas the number of nonconclusive tests concomitantly diminished from n = 35 to n = 3. The stress sequence increased AVA (P < 0.001) but decreased AVAproj (P = 0.006) and VC (P = 0.005). In the pooled Q-AVA data, the AIC value was lower for the saturating (sigmoidal) model compared with the linear model fitting (-1,593 vs. -1,504). "Dmax + PLR" is capable of reducing the number of nonconclusive DSE tests. With increasing stress strength, the Q-AVA relation progressively flattens, indicating saturation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The relation between transaortic flow (Q) and aortic valve opening area (AVA) shows a saturation when three different stress maneuvers are used to increase Q as much as possible. This has implications for the assessment of aortic stenosis severity.

Is Long COVID Syndrome a Transient Mitochondriopathy Newly Discovered: Implications of CPET.

The new outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has an impact worldwide, primarily as a medical emergency. Even that the total constellation is considered as a pandemic of acute respiratory disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) gives rise to dysfunction in multiple organs (e.g., brain, lungs, heart, muscles) that impairs cardiopulmonary (CP) function. Parallel to the CP consequences of COVID-19 is a significant reduction in physical activity. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is daily used in clinical practice to define prognosis, provide risk stratification and treatment strategy. As such, the significance of CPET is crucial concerning clinical assessments of COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, new studies aim at understanding the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in long term. Multiple studies have investigated the cardiopulmonary function and impairment of exercise endurance in such patients, as well as a possible prolonged physical impairment. With this review, we summarize the COVID-19-associated pathophysiology for the Long COVID (LC) syndrome as well as the importance of performing CPET.

Comparative Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unconscious and Conscious Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have a relevant coronary stenosis which may need revascularization. The short- and long-term ischemic and bleeding risk of unconscious and conscious OHCA patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the occurrence of 1-year outcomes after PCI between OHCA patients, stratified on the basis of state of consciousness, with patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not preceded by OHCA. METHODS: The study assessed the unadjusted and adjusted risk of cardiovascular events in a prospective single-center cohort of 9,303 consecutive PCI patients. RESULTS: At 1 year, all-cause mortality was higher in unconscious (49.5%) but not in conscious OHCA (8.9%) patients than in ACS patients (8.0%), and both unconscious and conscious OHCA patients were more likely than ACS patients to experience definite stent thrombosis (4.4% and 3.5% vs 1.3%) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (17.8% and 9.0% vs 5.1%). The higher hazards were largely determined by events occurring in the first 30 days. After multivariable adjustment, only unconscious OHCA patients remained at increased risk of death (adjusted HR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.65-4.05), definite stent thrombosis (adjusted HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.30-4.43), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (adjusted HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.82-3.47) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year after PCI, unconscious OHCA patients were at higher risk of death, definite stent thrombosis, and bleeding, while conscious OHCA patients had similar hazards compared with an all-comer ACS population without OHCA. Dedicated PCI strategies for OHCA patients taking into account their state of consciousness after resuscitation are warranted.

Passive Leg Raise Stress Echocardiography in Severe Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress echocardiography is used to increase transvalvular flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). Dobutamine fails to increase the stroke volume index (SVI) in one third of patients. The aim of this study was to test whether passive leg raise (PLR) added to dobutamine could increase SVI and transvalvular flow in patients with severe paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS. METHODS: Forty-five patients with apparent severe low-flow, low-gradient AS on the basis of traditional measurements were included. Twenty-five were categorized as belonging to the paradox group (left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] ≥ 50%) and 20 to the low EF group (left ventricular EF < 50% or "classical" low-flow, low-gradient AS) for comparison. A four-step stress echocardiographic examination was performed: resting conditions (rest), PLR alone (PLR), maximal dobutamine infusion rate (Dmax), and a combination of Dmax and PLR (Dmax+PLR). Aortic valve area, SVI, and mean transvalvular flow were calculated using both the velocity-time integral (VTI) of left ventricular outflow tract and the Simpson method. Changes compared with rest and between the stress maneuvers were analyzed. RESULTS: In the paradox group, compared with rest, left ventricular end-diastolic volume was significantly decreased with Dmax but was completely restored with Dmax+PLR (rest vs Dmax vs Dmax+PLR: 61 ± 15 vs 49 ± 18 mL [P < .001] vs 61 ± 18 mL [P = NS]). The smallest increase in SVI in the paradox group was observed during Dmax (PLR vs Dmax vs Dmax+PLR: VTI, 38 ± 4 mL/m2 [P < .001] vs 36 ± 7 mL/m2 [P = .019] vs 41 ± 7 mL/m2 [P < .001]; Simpson, 28 ± 6 mL/m2 [P < .001], 21 ± 7 mL/m2 [P = NS], 27 ± 7 mL/m2 [P = NS]). Compared with Dmax, Dmax+PLR was able to achieve a higher SVI (VTI, 36 ± 7 vs 41 ± 7 mL/m2 [P < .001]; Simpson, 21 ± 7 vs 27 ± 7 mL/m2 [P < .001]) and transvalvular flow with the Simpson method only (179 ± 56 vs 219 ± 56 mL/sec, P < .001), as well as a higher mean gradient (34 ± 10 vs 39 ± 12 mm Hg, P = .003) and AVA with the Simpson method (0.64 ± 0.21 vs 0.73 ± 0.21 cm2, P = .026). In the low EF group, only SVI VTI (31 ± 8 vs 35 ± 7 mL/m2, P = .034) and mean gradient (29 ± 12 vs 34 ± 14 mm Hg, P = .003) were higher with Dmax+PLR. The proportion of patients with SVI VTI ≥ 35 mL/m2 and increases of SVI VTI of >20% compared with rest was highest with Dmax+PLR in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine decreases preload in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS. Adding PLR counteracts this effect, resulting in increased SVI and flow (in one method). The combined stress maneuver allowed reclassification of some patients from severe to moderate AS and may therefore be useful in selected cases in this population in which severity is uncertain.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with rheumatic aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) accounts for the highest number of deaths from valvular heart disease globally. Yet, rheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) was excluded from landmark studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to describe the clinical and anatomical characteristics of patients with rheumatic AS undergoing TAVI, and to compare procedural and clinical outcomes with patients undergoing TAVI for degenerative AS. METHODS: In a prospective TAVI registry, patients with rheumatic AS were identified based on International Classification of Diseases version 10 codes and/or a documented history of acute rheumatic fever and/or the World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD, and were propensity score-matched in a 1:4 ratio to patients with degenerative AS. RESULTS: Among 2329 patients undergoing TAVI, 105 (4.5%) had rheumatic AS. Compared with patients with degenerative AS, patients with rheumatic AS were more commonly female, older, had higher surgical risk and more commonly suffered from multivalvular heart disease. In the unmatched cohort, both technical success (85.7% vs 85.9%, p=0.887) and 1-year cardiovascular mortality (10.0% vs 8.6%; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.18, p=0.656) were comparable between patients with rheumatic and degenerative AS. In contrast, patients with rheumatic AS had lower rates of 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality compared with matched patients with degenerative AS (1.9% vs 8.9%, adjusted HR (HRadj) 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80, p=0.024; and 10.0% vs 20.3%, HRadj 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84, p=0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION: TAVI may be a safe and effective treatment strategy for selected elderly patients with rheumatic AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01368250.

"Broken Heart" and "Broken Brain": Which Connection?

The interconnections between brain and heart are increasingly recognized. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, also known as "broken heart syndrome", is characterized by a cardiovascular dysfunction provoked by an emotional or stressful situation. Similar events can trigger a neurological pathology called transient global amnesia. These conditions can occur simultaneously, although their precise connection is not well understood. We aim to present the case of a patient who experienced them and to review the relevant literature.

Accuracy of intracoronary ECG parameters for myocardial ischemia detection.

INTRODUCTION: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a valuable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia during acute coronary syndrome. Aside from the commonly used ST-segment shift indicative of ischemia, several other ECG parameters are pathophysiologically reasonable. Thus, the goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of different ischemia parameters as obtained by the highly susceptible intracoronary ECG (icECG). METHOD: This was a retrospective observational study in 100 patients with chronic coronary syndrome. From each patient, a non-ischemic as well as ischemic icECG at the end of a one-minute proximal coronary balloon occlusion was available, and analysed twice by three different physicians, as well as once together for consensual results. The evaluated parameters were icECG ST-segment shift (mV), ST-integral (mV*sec), T-wave-integral (mV*sec), T-peak (mV), T-peak-to-end time (TPE; msec) and QTc-time (msec). RESULTS: All six icECG parameters showed significant differences between the non-ischemic and the ischemic recording. Using the icECG recording during coronary patency or occlusion as criterion for absent or present myocardial ischemia, ROC-analysis of icECG ST-segment shift showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963 ± 0.029 (p < 0.0001). AUC for ST-integral was 0.899 ± 0.044 (p < 0.0001), for T-wave integral 0.791 ± 0.059 (p < 0.0001), for T-peak 0.811 ± 0.057 (p < 0.0001), for TPE 0.667 ± 0.068 (p < 0.0001), and for QTc-time 0.770 ± 0.061 (p < 0.0001). The best cut-off point for the detection of ischemia by icECG ST-segment shift was 0.365 mV (sensitivity 90%, specificity 95%). CONCLUSION: When tested in a setting with artificially induced absolute myocardial ischemia, icECG ST-segment shift at a threshold of 0.365 mV most accurately distinguishes between absent and present ischemia.