Multicenter Study of Metastatic Lung Tumors Targeted by Interventional Cryoablation Evaluation (SOLSTICE).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and local recurrence-free survival in patients after cryoablation for treatment of pulmonary metastases. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study included 128 patients with 224 lung metastases treated with percutaneous cryoablation, with 12 and 24 months of follow-up. The patients were enrolled on the basis of the outlined key inclusion criteria, which include one to six metastases from extrapulmonary cancers with a maximal diameter of 3.5 cm. Time to progression of the index tumor(s), metastatic disease, and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Complications were captured for 30 days after the procedure, and changes in performance status and quality of life were also evaluated. RESULTS: Median size of metastases was 1.0 plus or minus 0.6 cm (0.2-4.5) with a median number of tumors of 1.0 plus or minus 1.2 cm (one to six). Local recurrence-free response (local tumor efficacy) of the treated tumor was 172 of 202 (85.1%) at 12 months and 139 of 180 (77.2%) at 24 months after the initial treatment. After a second cryoablation treatment for recurrent tumor, secondary local recurrence-free response (local tumor efficacy) was 184 of 202 (91.1%) at 12 months and 152 of 180 (84.4%) at 24 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 97.6% (95% confidence interval: 92.6-99.2) and 86.6% (95% confidence interval: 78.7-91.7), respectively. Rate of pneumothorax that required pleural catheter placement was 26% (44/169). There were eight grade 3 complication events in 169 procedures (4.7%) and one (0.6%) grade 4 event. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for pulmonary metastases.

Early results from a United States trial of prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: To report early findings from a prospective United States clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to March 2013, 72 patients were screened and 20 patients underwent treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline and selected intervals (1, 3, and 6 mo) for the following efficacy variables: American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, quality of life (QOL)-related symptoms, International Index of Erectile Function score, peak urine flow rate, and prostate volume (on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 mo). Complications were monitored and reported per Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. RESULTS: Embolization was technically successful in 18 of 20 patients (90%); bilateral PAE was successful in 18 of 19 (95%). Unsuccessful embolizations were secondary to atherosclerotic occlusion of prostatic arteries. Clinical success was seen in 95% of patients (19 of 20) at 1 month, with average AUA symptom score improvements of 10.8 points at 1 month (P < .0001), 12.1 points at 3 months (P = .0003), and 9.8 points at 6 months (P = .06). QOL improved at 1 month (1.9 points; P = .0002), 3 months (1.9 points; P = .003), and 6 months (2.6 points; P = .007). Sexual function improved by 34% at 1 month (P = .11), 5% at 3 months (P = .72), and 16% at 6 months (P = .19). Prostate volume at 6 months had decreased 18% (n = 5; P = .05). No minor or major complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Early results from this clinical trial indicate that PAE offers a safe and efficacious treatment option for men with BPH.

Utility of cone-beam CT imaging in prostatic artery embolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of cone-beam computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing prostatic artery (PA) embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2013, 15 patients (age range, 59-81 y; mean, 68 y) with moderate- or severe-grade lower urinary tract symptoms, in whom medical management had failed were enrolled in a prospective United States trial to evaluate PAE. During pelvic angiography, 15 cone-beam CT acquisitions were performed in 11 patients, and digital subtraction angiography was performed in all patients. Cone-beam CT images were reviewed to assess for sites of potential nontarget embolization that impacted therapy, a pattern of enhancement on cone-beam CT suggesting additional PAs, confirmation of prostatic parenchymal perfusion before embolization, and contralateral prostatic parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS: Cone-beam CT was successful in 14 of 15 acquisitions, and PAE was successful in 14 of 15 patients (92%). Cone-beam CT provided information that impacted treatment in five of 11 patients (46%) by allowing for identification of sites of potential nontarget embolization. Duplicated prostatic arterial supply and contralateral perfusion were each identified in 21% of patients (three of 11). Prostatic perfusion was confirmed before embolization in 50% of acquisitions (seven of 14). CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam CT is a useful technique that can potentially mitigate the risk of nontarget embolization. During treatment, it can allow for the interventionalist to identify duplicated prostatic arterial supply or contralateral perfusion, which may be useful when evaluating a treatment failure.

Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of surgically unresectable pancreatic cancer: a case report.

The present report describes a case of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) in a 78-year-old man with surgically unresectable stage III (tumor/node/metastasis stages, T4N0M0) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Two ablations were performed for a 4.1-cm mass encasing the celiac and superior mesenteric artery. At 3 months, a solitary liver metastasis developed, which was treated with radiofrequency ablation followed by gemcitabine chemotherapy. At 6-month follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated no residual disease and a decreasing cancer antigen 19-9 level. Percutaneous IRE shows promise as a feasible and potentially safe method for local tumor control in patients with surgically unresectable disease.

Power injection of microcatheters: an in vitro comparison.

PURPOSE: To determine the tolerance of 0.021-inch and 0.027-inch microcatheters to power injection in an in vitro flow model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four microcatheters (0.021-inch, n = 13; 0.027-inch, n = 11) were injected with iothalamate meglumine through a flow model with use of a power injector and high-pressure tubing. Catheters used included Rebar (0.021-inch, n = 4; 0.027-inch, n = 4), Transit (0.021-inch, n = 3; 0.027-inch, n = 3), Renegade (0.021-inch, n = 4; 0.027-inch, n = 4), and Renegade STC-18 (0.021-inch, n = 2) models. Through the 0.021-inch microcatheters, 5-second injections were performed at an initial rate of 0.7 mL/sec. Injection rates were increased by 0.5 mL/sec and the process was repeated until the pressure approached 1,000 psi or catheter breakage occurred. A similar process was repeated for the 0.027-inch catheters starting at a rate of 3.4 mL/sec. RESULTS: The 0.021-inch catheters were injected 303 times and the 0.027-inch catheters were injected 210 times. Three catheter failures occurred, with all breaks occurring at pressures greater than manufacturer recommendations. The 0.027-inch catheters as a group tolerated significantly higher injection rates than the 0.021-inch catheters. Of the 0.021-inch catheters, the STC-18 also provided superior maximum flow and volume compared with the Renegade catheter. The Rebar catheter tolerated significantly lower maximum injection rates and volumes than the other 0.027-inch catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of microcatheters can be power-injected in vitro at pressures far greater than manufacturer recommendations. When fractures occur, they are near the hub of the catheter. Significantly greater rates of injection are possible through 0.027-inch catheters.