Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiother Oncol ; 128(2): 301-307, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29764692

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after combined high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with clinically localised high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012, three hundred and three consecutive patients with organ-confined high-risk prostate cancer were treated with definitive radiotherapy consisting of HDR-BRT followed by supplemental EBRT. The transrectal 3D-ultrasound-based HDR-BRT boost consisted of two single-fraction implants of 10.5 Gy, prescribed to the 90% of the gland (D90), for a total physical dose of 21.0 Gy delivered to the prostatic gland. EBRT was delivered with conventional fractionation, prescribing 45.0 Gy to the prostatic gland and seminal vesicles. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix Consensus Criteria, genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was evaluated using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 71.6 months. The 7-year overall survival, biochemical control and metastasis-free-survival rates for the entire cohort were 85.7%, 88.3% and 93.8%, respectively. Androgen deprivation therapy was initiated prior to treatment for 92.7% of patients with a median duration of 12 months. Toxicity was scored per event with late Grade 2, 3 and 4 GU adverse events and was found to be 15.3%, 2.2% and 0.3%, respectively. Late Grade 2 GI toxicity accounted for 0.3% with no instances of Grade 3 or higher late adverse events. CONCLUSION: HDR-BRT with supplemental EBRT results in low biochemical relapse-free survival rates associated with a very low incidence of higher-grade late adverse events.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Gastroenteropatias/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Urogenitais Masculinas/etiologia , Doenças Urogenitais Masculinas/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Glândulas Seminais/efeitos dos fármacos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 85(3): 672-8, 2013 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22929859

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcome of high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial (IRT) brachytherapy (BRT) as sole treatment (monotherapy) for clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2002 and December 2009, 718 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided HDR monotherapy. Three treatment protocols were applied; 141 patients received 38.0 Gy using one implant in 4 fractions of 9.5 Gy with computed tomography-based treatment planning; 351 patients received 38.0 Gy in 4 fractions of 9.5 Gy, using 2 implants (2 weeks apart) and intraoperative TRUS real-time treatment planning; and 226 patients received 34.5 Gy, using 3 single-fraction implants of 11.5 Gy (3 weeks apart) and intraoperative TRUS real-time treatment planning. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix consensus, and toxicity was evaluated using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 52.8 months. The 36-, 60-, and 96-month biochemical control and metastasis-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 97%, 94%, and 90% and 99%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. Toxicity was scored per event, with 5.4% acute grade 3 genitourinary and 0.2% acute grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Late grade 3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 3.5% and 1.6%, respectively. Two patients developed grade 4 incontinence. No other instance of grade 4 or greater acute or late toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm IRT-HDR-BRT is safe and effective as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...