Feasibility and relevance of right parasternal view for assessing severity and rate of progression of aortic valve stenosis in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Right parasternal view (RPV) is important in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). However, the feasibility and relevance of RPV in primary care is unresolved. Moreover, information regarding the role of RPV in the evaluation of the hemodynamic progression of AS is lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients with peak aortic valve velocity (Vmax) ≥2.5m/s were prospectively enrolled in a primary care echocardiographic laboratory. Aortic Doppler parameters were evaluated from apical view and RPV. RESULTS: The total number of enrolled patients was 330 (aged 81±11years, 47% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 64±9%). The RPV was feasible in 275 (83%). Vmax and Mean Gradient were significantly higher and aortic valve area was significantly lower from RPV as compared to apical view (p<0.0001 for all). Reclassification of severity towards either moderate or severe AS occurred in 13-26% of patients, according to different criteria, when evaluated from RPV. Among 108 patients (40%) undergoing multiple examinations the rate of progression was lower from the apical approach than from the RPV (0.19±0.20m/s/year vs. 0.24±0.27m/s/year, respectively; p=0.03), and was fast (>0.3m/s/year) in 17 patients (16%) from the apical window vs. 26 patients (24%) from RPV (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Implementing RPV is feasible in primary care and results in a substantial reclassification rate through the entire spectrum of AS severity. Our data also suggest a potential role of Doppler interrogation from multiple windows to improve AS progression assessment.

Effect of Echocardiographic Grading of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction by Different Classifications in Primary Care.

The presence of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) as characterized by Doppler echocardiography is associated with worse overall mortality both in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. However, available data on this topic come from referral centers and have been obtained by different, validated algorithms for each single study. Thus, we aimed at determining the feasibility of comprehensive evaluation of LVDD in a primary care outpatient setting and at testing the concordance of different methodological approaches in grading diastolic dysfunction. Eight hundred eighty-five consecutive outpatients, in sinus rhythm, prospectively underwent Doppler echocardiography according to a predetermined protocol. Feasibility of each LV diastolic index and concordance between 3 methods to determine the degree of LVDD, namely the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography (ASE/EAE) recommendations, the Olmstead County, and the Canberra Study protocols, were tested. Feasibility of all diastolic indexes was high, ranging from 93% of Valsalva maneuver to ≥99% for mitral inflow and tissue Doppler parameters. Diastolic function was not classifiable in 6% to 19% of patients. The concordance for LV diastolic dysfunction degree was fair when comparing the classification of the ASE/EAE with those from Olmstead County (κ = 0.25; reclassification rate 51%) and Canberra Study (κ = 0.27; reclassification rate 43.7%), and was good for the comparison between the Olmstead County and Canberra classifications (κ = 0.68, reclassification rate 27%). In conclusion, feasibility of LV diastolic function measurements is very high and grading diastolic dysfunction is possible in most patients in primary care settings. Substantial differences, however, exist when concordance is tested among 3 documented criteria, resulting in poor concordance of data interpretation and hence patient stratification and clinical management.

Association of left ventricular longitudinal and circumferential systolic dysfunction with diastolic function in hypertension: a nonlinear analysis focused on the interplay with left ventricular geometry.

BACKGROUND: The relationships of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal and circumferential systolic dysfunction with diastolic performance in hypertensive patients have never been compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 532 asymptomatic hypertensive patients, circumferential function was assessed with the use of midwall fractional shortening (mFS) and stress-corrected mFS (SCmFS), whereas longitudinal function was assessed with the use of left atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) and systolic mitral annulus velocity (s'). Early diastolic annular velocity (e') and the E/e' ratio were measured. Global longitudinal and circumferential strain were determined in a subset of 210 patients. e' was linearly related to all systolic indexes (AVPD: R = 0.40; s': R = 0.39; mFS: R = 0.16; SCmFS: R = 0.17; all P < .0001), but the correlations were stronger with longitudinal indexes than with circumferential ones (P < .0001). E/e' was nonlinearly related to AVPD (R = -0.49; P < .0001) and s' (R = -0.34; P < .0001) and showed no relationship with mFS and SCmFS. Longitudinal indexes were superior to circumferential ones in predicting e' <8 cm/s, E/e' <8, and E/e' ≥13. The effect of LV geometry on LV diastolic function was evident among patients with preserved systolic longitudinal function, but was blunted among patients with impaired longitudinal function. In multivariable analyses, only longitudinal indexes remained associated with e' and E/e'. Analyses using strains provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic hypertensive subjects, LV diastolic performance is independently associated with longitudinal systolic dysfunction, but not with circumferential systolic dysfunction. Subtle longitudinal systolic impairment plays a role in mediating the effect of LV geometry on diastolic performance. These findings may support the need of critically revising the concept of isolated diastolic dysfunction in these patients.

Hemodynamic progression and outcome of asymptomatic aortic stenosis in primary care.

The prognostic relevance of a rapid rate of hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis (AS) has been predominantly investigated in tertiary centers. We reviewed the clinical and echocardiographic data from 153 asymptomatic patients with AS (age 77 ± 9 years; 65% men), with normal left ventricular function and paired echocardiograms ≥4 months apart (mean 2.9 ± 2.1 years), evaluated in a nonreferral echocardiographic laboratory. The severity of AS was graded by the peak aortic velocity (Vmax) and progression was classified as slow or fast according to a cutoff value of 0.3 m/s increase annually. The end points were all-cause mortality and a composite of all-cause mortality and aortic valve replacement (AVR). At baseline, 135 patients (88%) had mild-to-moderate and 18 (12%) severe AS. Of the 153 patients, 49 (32%) showed fast progression (0.61 ± 0.32 m/s/yr) and 104 (68%) had slow progression (0.10 ± 0.16 m/s/yr). Among the 144 patients (94%) with clinical follow-up data, 40 died and 48 underwent AVR. The mortality rate was greater than that of the general population (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of mortality were the yearly change in Vmax (hazard ratio [HR] 13.352 per m/s increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.136 to 34.713, p <0.001) and age (HR 1.122 per year, 95% CI 1.0728 to 1.735, p <0.001). The predictors of the composite end point of death and AVR were the yearly change in Vmax (HR 12.307, 95% CI 6.024 to 25.140, p <0.001) and Vmax on the initial echocardiogram (HR 2.684, 95% CI 1.921 to 3.750, p <0.001). In conclusion, primary care patients with asymptomatic AS are usually elderly and frequently develop rapid hemodynamic progression, which independently predicts, not only AVR, but also overall mortality.

Determinants of echocardiographic left atrial volume: implications for normalcy.

AIMS: The relative role of multiple determinants of left atrial volume index (LAVi) in athletes and non-athletes is not fully defined. Thus, we decided to prospectively assess the determinants of LAVi in healthy individuals and competitive athletes over a wide age range. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred and eighteen healthy individuals (mean age 41.7 ± 15.6 years, range 16-84, 65% males, 38% competitive athletes) underwent Doppler echocardiography including assessment of LAVi by the biplane area-length method and of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function including the ratio of early diastolic peak LV inflow velocity to peak myocardial early diastolic velocity (E/e'). Mean LAVi was 32.2 ± 9.0 mL/m(2) in the pooled population. LAVi was larger in athletes than in non-athletes (38.9 ± 9.6 mL/m(2) vs. 28.4 ± 5.8 mL/m(2), P < 0.0001). In the pooled population a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis identified LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) (ß = 0.378, P < 0.0001), LV mass index (LVMi) (ß = 0.260, P < 0.0001), competitive sport activity (ß = 0.258, P < 0.0001), and age (ß = 0.222, P < 0.0001) as independent determinants of LAVi (model R(2) = 0.54, P < 0.0001). By separate analyses, although LVEDVi, age, and LVMi were predictors of LAVi in both groups, body mass index and the E/e' ratio were additional predictors of LAVi only in non-athletes. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy individuals LV size, competitive sport, age, and LV mass are independent determinants of LAVi. Body mass index and the E/e' ratio affect LAVi only in non-athletes. These findings may have practical implications when assessing normalcy of LA size in the clinical setting.