Impact of sertraline daily treatment regimen on adherence, persistence and healthcare resource utilisation in patients with major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder: A real-world evidence analysis from the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To generate real-world evidence (RWE) from the United States to assess the impact of pill burden and the importance of achieving a stable daily dose of sertraline (time taken, number of dose adjustments needed) on adherence/persistence and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the PharMetrics® Plus database (1 October 2012 to 31 March 2020) in the United States. Eligible patients had major depressive disorder (MDD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and ≥1 claim for sertraline during index period (1 April 2013 to 31 March 2019, allowing 6-months prior, 1-year post-index follow-up). Patients who achieved stable daily dose of sertraline (>90 days on same dose) were categorised into five cohorts, depending on pill burden/daily dose: Cohort (1): 1 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (2): 1 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (3): 2 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (4): 1.5 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (5): 3 × 50 mg/d. Impact of pill burden on adherence/persistence and HCRU was assessed among cohorts using logistic regression analysis, and between patients who did vs did not stabilise on therapy. P < .05 was considered significant for all analyses. RESULTS: Of 224 412 eligible patients, 108 729 stabilised on sertraline (50, 100 or 150 mg/d) and formed Cohorts 1-5. Stabilised patients on lower pill burden had statistically higher adherence and were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1-year post-index period vs patients on higher pill burden but same overall dose (100 mg/d [Cohort 2 vs 3] and 150 mg/d [Cohort 4 vs 5], respectively). Patients who did not stabilise had significantly lower adherence/persistence vs patients who achieved stable daily dose (Cohorts 1-5 combined). Persistence improved when stable daily dose was achieved quickly (within 1-4 months) and efficiently (within 1-3 dose adjustments). Probability of HCRU increased for patients who did not stabilise on their initial prescription. CONCLUSION: Simplifying treatment regimen and decreasing pill burden improved adherence and/or persistence with sertraline therapy (100 or 150 mg/d). Patients achieving stable daily dose of sertraline in an efficient and timely manner were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1-year follow-up.

Restoring function in major depressive disorder: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Functional impairment contributes to significant disability and economic burden in major depressive disorder (MDD). Treatment response is measured by improvement in depressive symptoms, but functional improvement often lags behind symptomatic improvement. Residual deficits are associated with relapse of depressive symptoms. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the following terms: "major depressive disorder," "functional impairment," "functional outcomes," "recovery of function," "treatment outcome," "outcome assessment," "social functioning," "presenteeism," "absenteeism," "psychiatric status rating scales," and "quality of life." Search limits included publication date (January 1, 1995 to August 31, 2016), English language, and human clinical trials. Controlled, acute-phase, nonrecurrent MDD treatment studies in adults were included if a functional outcome was measured at baseline and endpoint. RESULTS: The qualitative analysis included 35 controlled studies. The Sheehan Disability Scale was the most commonly used functional assessment. Antidepressant treatments significantly improved functional outcomes. Early treatment response predicted functional improvement, while baseline disease severity did not. LIMITATIONS: Clinical studies utilized various methodologies and assessments for functional impairment, and were not standardized or adequately powered. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of synchronicity between symptomatic and functional improvement highlights an unmet need for MDD. Treatment guided by routine monitoring of symptoms and functionality may minimize residual functional impairments.

A review of the growing evidence base for pediatric psychopharmacology.

This article provides an update of pediatric psychopharmacologic treatment evidence and focuses on six classes of medications in pediatric populations: psychostimulants, mood stabilizers, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotic agents, and other agents. The evidence is organized by disorder so that it is most useful to practicing clinicians. We begin each section with a brief introduction and summary of the findings published before January 1998. Priority is given to clinical trials that use random assignment and use of a comparison group (ie, placebo-control, head-to-head comparison, or cross-over design). Serious concerns remain about the efficacy and safety of many of these agents for use in children and adolescents. While a great progress is being made, there is clearly much work left to be done.

Antipsychotics for aggressive adolescents: barriers to best practice.

In adolescents, antipsychotics are most often used to treat complex, comorbid conditions with core disruptive features. However, the literature guiding such practices is limited. Best practice guidelines bridging the gap between the evidence and clinical practice have been developed to promote the appropriate and safe use of antipsychotics in aggressive youths. Due to complex barriers that exist at the level of the physician, patient/family and organization, merely disseminating these guidelines will not likely change antipsychotic prescribing practices. Negative attitudes, time constraints, lack of staff training and resources, or adolescent/family nonadherence can impede the translation of best practice guidelines into routine practices. Efforts to implement best practice guidelines must address these barriers if changes in prescribing practices are to occur and be sustained.