Complications of the ketogenic diet.

PURPOSE: The ketogenic diet has been successfully used in treatment of pediatric epilepsy for >70 years. Few serious complications caused by the diet have been reported. We report complications that have been experienced by children receiving the ketogenic diet. METHODS: In a 22-month period, we treated 52 children with the classic ketogenic diet and monitored them in a prospective manner. RESULTS: Five children (10%) experienced serious adverse events (AE) after initiation of the diet. Four patients (80%) were treated with valproate (VPA) in addition to the diet, as compared with 25 (53%) of the other 47 children. Two patients developed severe hypoproteinemia within 4 weeks of initiation of the diet, and 1 of them also developed lipemia and hemolytic anemia. A third child developed Fanconi's renal tubular acidosis within 1 month of diet initiation. Two other children manifested marked increases in liver function tests, 1 during the initiation phase and the other 13 months later. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians who wish to use the ketogenic diet must be aware of the potential of serious AE and possible interactions of the diet with VPA.

Two year maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer disease with ranitidine 150 mg: a prospective multicentre randomised study. GEMUD (Groupe d'Etude de la Maladie Ulcéreuse Duodénale).

Maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer (DU) with ranitidine 150 mg/day was compared with placebo in a two year prospective multicentre randomised study. Three hundred and ninety nine patients were included (mean age: 44.7 years, M/F ratio = 2.47/1; 37.6% of smokers) in placebo (n = 202) and ranitidine (n = 197) groups. Efficacy was assessed by the length of time to the first ulcer pain attack (with or without endoscopic confirmation) or DU complication. One hundred and fourteen patients of 399 (28.6%) had incomplete follow up. Actuarial survival curves of patients without ulcer pain (26 and 53% at two years in placebo and ranitidine groups, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.0001). Endoscopies were performed depending on physicians' decision (mainly where there was severe pain or complication). Patients without relapses from endoscopy were more frequent in the ranitidine group (83%) than in the placebo group (47%, p < 0.0001). A greater incidence of complications, mainly bleeding, was also seen in the placebo group (13 complications v two in the ranitidine group, p < 0.002). No factor predicting DU relapse was identified. No important side effect was encountered. Ranitidine 150 mg/day is effective and well tolerated in preventing ulcer pain attacks and DU complications for up to two years.

Role of adrenergic tone in mechanical and functional properties of carotid artery during aging.

The present study was designed to assess the role of the adrenergic tone in the regulation of carotid arterial compliance during aging. An experimental model of in situ isolated carotid arteries has been used to evaluate the elastic properties of the arterial wall in young (3-mo-old) and older (18-mo-old) Wistar rats. Binding experiments were performed in the same strain of rats to evaluate alpha 1- and beta-adrenoceptor affinity and density. In a third set of experiments, structural parameter of the carotid artery in younger and older rats was evaluated. Arterial distensibility (compliance per unit of volume) was significantly lower in older rats. This was associated with a significant thickness of the media (45.6 +/- 2.8 vs. 57.5 +/- 5.7 microns, P < 0.01) and increased collagen content in older rats (4,420 +/- 310 vs. 7,320 +/- 850 microns 2/mm, P < 0.001). However, carotid arterial compliance was not altered in older rats because of the significant increase in cross-sectional area with aging. Aging did not affect alpha 1-adrenoceptor affinity and density, whereas it decreased beta-density without changing their affinity. Pharmacological stimulation of alpha 1-adrenoceptor with phenylephrine (10(-5) M) decreased compliance in older but not in younger animals. Blockade of these receptors with prazosin or labetalol increased compliance in younger and had no effect on older rats. beta-receptor stimulation with isoproterenol or blockade with propranolol had no effect in any of the studied groups. We suggest that with aging there is an increased vasoconstricting effect of alpha-agonists and a decreased vasodilatative action of alpha-blockade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Use of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in adult asthma]. / Utilisation du dipropionate de béclométasone inhalé dans l'asthme de l'adulte.

Beclomethasone dipropionate has now been used for more than 10 years during which our knowledge of how to use inhaled corticosteroids has gradually improved: high dose initial treatment followed by progressive reduction down to the minimum effective dosage; administration in 2 daily doses when the asthma is stable and 4 daily doses in case of instability; mild and transient undesirable effects, often minimized by a correct use of the inhaler; effectiveness assessed from bronchial hyper-reactivity and respiratory function tests, reduction or avoidance of oral corticosteroid therapy, or results of association with other treatments, and in particular bronchodilators. When exactly should inhaled corticosteroid therapy should be started and how long should it be pursued are controversial points, but an early and prolonged treatment must probably be recommended.

Influence of the timing of administration of 300 mg ranitidine on 24-hour gastric pH in patients acute duodenal ulcer.

The 24-hour intragastric pH of 12 patients with an acute duodenal ulcer was recorded with the aim of comparing the effects of two different times of administration of 300 mg ranitidine: post evening meal, or bedtime. This double-blind crossover trial involved 3 centres. Twenty-four-hour gastric pH was measured under standard conditions (meals, time schedule) at the middle of each 14-day treatment period. The analysis was performed on the percentage of times spent at pH levels below 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 for different periods and for the total 24 hours. During the whole day and night combined, as well as during the afternoon (12.00 hours-19.00 hours), there was no difference between the 2 regimens regardless of the pH profile studied. During the morning (07.30 hours-12.00 hours), the time spent below pH 1.5 and 2 was less when the drug was taken at bedtime (P less than 0.05). In contrast, during the whole night (19.00 hours-07.30 hours) the percentage of time spent below pH 1.5, 2 and 3 was significantly less when the drug was taken at post evening meal (P less than 0.05). These results show that in patients with acute duodenal ulcer, 300 mg ranitidine administered at the end of the evening meal provides better control of nocturnal acidity than administration at bedtime and hence is suggested for optimization of therapeutic efficacy.

[Salmeterol and prolonged treatment of asthma: international clinical data]. / Salmétérol et traitement prolongé de l'asthme: données cliniques internationales.

Salmeterol is an original molecule with a selective-beta-2-sympathomimetic effect which is intended to a prolonged treatment of asthma. This inhaled preparation has a long duration of action which points to its use on a BID regimen. Results of the phase III development has been assessed in 2,277 subjects. Salmeterol administered at a dose of 50 micrograms morning and evening results in a marked increase in FEV1, which remains superior to 15% by comparison with baseline 12 hours after the last dose in the majority of subjects. In the specific case of more severe asthma (FEV1 less than 50% of predicted), the use of 100 micrograms morning and evening allows for an extra-improvement in FEV1. In the majority of studies, salmeterol has resulted in an almost complete remission of the clinical symptomatology: disappearance or major diminution in the use of inhaled salbutamol administered as a rescue medication on a PRN basis (during the day and at night) and of nocturnal awakenings, global improvement of clinical scores. Daily peak expiratory flow rates (morning and night values) are considerably improved (greater than or equal to 50 l/min) with a significant reduction of daily swings. Lung function tests are also very significantly improved. Salmeterol has proved to be largely superior to the comparison medications, salbutamol taken at a dose of 200 micrograms four times a day, and optimal therapy with theophylline. Clinical acceptability of salmeterol is good and is not different from salbutamol.

[Slow-release salbutamol in the treatment of nocturnal asthma. Result of a comparative study vs. long-acting theophylline]. / Salbutamol à libération prolongée dans le traitement de l'asthme nocturne. Résultat d'une étude comparative versus théophylline L.A..

In a multicentre, randomized, cross-over double-blind, double placebo trial the effectiveness and tolerability of slow-release oral salbutamol (SRS) were compared with those of long-acting (LA) theophylline (T) in the treatment of nocturnal asthma of adults. Forty-nine patients (mean age 37 years) entered the study after a pre-trial period during which a placebo and inhaled salbutamol were used as reference and to test the criteria of inclusion. The number of awakenings due to asthma symptoms was the same with SRS, and T, falling from 1.27 in the pre-trial period to 0.44 under SRS and 0.42 under T. The scores of nocturnal asthma symptoms were improved with both types of treatment. The number of puffs of inhaled salbutamol necessary during the night decreased from 1.94 in the pre-trial period to 1.15 under SRS and 0.92 under T. The number of patients improved was exactly the same in both groups. The ventilatory parameters measured by respiratory function tests at different visits and daily by the patients themselves were also improved. The principal minor side-effects were tremor (5 cases) and irritability (3 cases) with SRS, and nausea (6 cases), headache (3 cases) and asthenia (2 cases) with T; an overdose of T resulted in malaise in one patients. It is concluded that slow-release oral salbutamol administered in doses of 8 mg b.d. is effective in controlling nocturnal asthma, easy to take and very well tolerated.

[Ondansetron: a specific 5-HT3 serotonin receptor inhibitor, a new antiemetic in oncology]. / Ondansétron: un nouvel antiémétique en oncologie, inhibiteur spécifique des récepteurs à la sérotonine du type 5-HT3.

Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) seems to play a dominant role in triggering vomiting induced by cytotoxic agents through the stimulation of 5-HT3 receptors. They have been observed in the GI tract as well as in the brain (area postrema). Ondansetron is a specific antagonist of 5-HT3 serotonin receptors. Its anti-emetic activity is very powerful in the ferret. The availability of an injectable or oral form of this product allows the overall treatment of acute and delayed emesis and its administration is in accordance with different schedules: single IV injection or a continuous 24 hour infusion or repeated IV injection followed by oral treatment. The pharmacokinetics of the drug are as follows: absorption begins about 30 minutes after the administration per os, its biodisponibility is about 60%, its clearance: 20 ml/minute and its elimination half life about 3 hours. Different double blind studies, carried out in parallel groups or in cross over, demonstrated the superiority of ondansetron over metoclopramide in the control of nausea and vomiting, whether or not the chemotherapy contained cisplatin; a more recent study shows also that ondansetron was superior to alizapride and methylprednisolone in combination. Side effects of ondansetron do not include extrapyramidal symptoms but only headaches and constipation. The use of ondansetron improves the well-being of patients receiving chemotherapy and increases protocol compliance.

[Bronchial tolerance to inhalation of beclomethasone. Histologic and microbiologic study in asthmatic patients]. / Tolérance bronchique à l'inhalation de béclométasone. Etude histologique et microbiologique chez l'asthmatique.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of a three months' treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate on the bronchial mucosa of asthmatic patients. Eleven patients suffering from a mild chronic asthma treated with inhaled salbutamol and theophylline were randomly assigned to receive either 1000 mu g of beclomethasone dipropionate (6 patients) or an aerosolized placebo (5 patients) in a double-blind manner. Bronchial biopsies and bronchial secretions were obtained through a fiberoptic procedure at the beginning and the end of the study. Repeated clinical and spirometric investigations were performed each month. Inter- and intra-group mean changes of clinical symptoms and of spirometric values were not significantly different. Pathogens were rarely found in bronchial aspirates and their occurrence did not seem to be influenced by the beclomethasone therapy. Sixty percent of the bronchial biopsies displayed pathological changes of the mucosa that observed at the beginning and at the end of the study; however, no sign of mucosal atrophy was noted.

[Ambulatory treatment with cefuroxime-axetil of infectious bronchitis in patients sixty years of age or older: comparative study of the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid]. / Traitement ambulatoire par le céfuroxime-axetil des bronchites infectieuses du sujet de soixante ans ou plus: étude comparative avec l'association d'amoxicilline et d'acide clavulanique.

The aim of this multicenter, prospective randomized trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of cefuroxime-axetil and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid for the treatment of infectious bronchitis in the elderly patient. Between January and April 1989, 157 out patients aged 60 years or more and presenting with infectious bronchitis were treated with either cefuroxime-axetil (250 mg bid), or the association amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (500 mg/125 mg bid). The two treatment groups were comparable at the time of inclusion; the mean age was 70 years, 82% of the patients were febrile, 75% presented purulent expectoration, 24% had a history of chronic bronchitis and 19% received symptomatic treatment was NSAIDs. The mean duration of treatment was 9 days. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the investigators. While fever and cough resolved similarly in the two groups, statistically fewer patients presented persistent purulent expectoration in the cefuroxime-axetil treatment group than in the group receiving amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (2% and 13%, respectively, p = 0.03). The proportion of patients who reported at least one side-effect was 3.6% in the cefuroxime-axetil treatment group against 21.6% of those who received the association (p = 0.006).

[Efficacy of the combination of ceftazidime/vancomycin in the first line treatment of infection in neutropenic children]. / Efficacité de l'association ceftazidime/vancomycine dans le traitement de première intention des infections des enfants neutropéniques.

UNLABELLED: Infection is the first reason of mortality in children with bone marrow aplasia. It justifies the immediate treatment initiation before bacteriological cultures results. First line probabilistic treatment must have a bactericidal activity on the pathogens and must be atoxic. The empirical therapy consisted of ceftazidime 100 mg/k/d and vancomycine 40 mg/k/d three times a day. We treated 41 patients, ranged from 0.5 to 17 years (mean 9.5 years). 27 lymphoblastic leukaemias, 10 myeloblastic leukaemias, 4 lymphomas, presenting post therapeutic prolonged aplasia: PMN less than 500/mm3. 23 strains were isolated from 15 patients. 12 Gram+: 7 ceftazidime sensitive, 12 vancomycine sensitive and 11 Gram-: 10 ceftazidime sensitive. Only one is resistant to ceftazidime + vancomycine. Apyrexia was obtained in less than 48 hours in 36 patients. Mean treatment duration was 16 days. Hyperthermia relapsed 17 times and was susceptible to ampho B ten times, although no candida was isolated. When ceftazidime + vancomycine combination failed, other antibiotic treatment was ineffective. There were 4 superinfections (2 in blood, 1 enteric, 1 pharyngeal) and 2 germs were ceftazidime resistant. IN CONCLUSION: ceftazidime + vancomycine combination is a very effective treatment of infection in the neutropenic children: 88% success. 95% of the germs are sensitive to, at least, one of the 2 antibiotics. There are very few superinfections. Tolerance is excellent.

[Hypertension in the elderly. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of labetalol and nifedipine. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind study]. / HTA du sujet âgé. Comparaison de l'efficacité et de la tolérance du labétalol et de la nifédipine. Etude multicentrique, randomisée, en simple insu.

This randomized multicentre study in elderly hypertensives with two unbalanced groups (2 patients under labetalol for 1 patient under nifedipine) compared the efficacy and safety of labetalol, whose dosage could be adjusted (1, 2, then 3 tablets/day) according to blood pressure level (BP greater than or equal to 160/95 mmHg), to that of nifedipine given at its recommended dosage (2 tablets/day). The treatment period lasted 6 weeks (D42). The main judgment criteria was the rate of patients with normalized BP under treatment (SBP less than 160 and DBP less than 95 mmHg). The analysis was carried out on 170 patients, 112 labetalol and 58 nifedipine. Both groups were homogeneous when entering into the study. The only difference was a higher rate of smokers in the nifedipine group compared with labetalol's (29% vs 13%). The rate of patients with normalized BP (SBP less than 160 and DBP less than 95 mmHg) were 66% in the labetalol group and 48% in the nifedipine's (p less than 0.05). Treatment withdrawals for all causes during the study were more frequent in the nifedipine group (19%) than in the labetalol's (6%). Treatment withdrawals for adverse events occurred in 3.5% of patients in the labetalol group and in 12% of the nifedipine's. The overall adverse events rate was 9% with labetalol and 29% with nifedipine (p less than 0.001). In this comparative study in elderly hypertensives, labetalol given in a dose titration schedule proved significantly superior to nifedipine, given at recommended maximal dosage, in terms of both BP control and side effects profile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Intermittent treatment or preventive treatment of recurrence in duodenal ulcer disease? A controlled, double-blind study with 150 mg ranitidine daily for one year]. / Traitement des poussées ou traitement préventif des récidives dans la maladie ulcéreuse duodénale? Etude contrôlée en double aveugle d'une prise quotidienne de ranitidine 150 mg pendant un an.

This 1-year study compared two pragmatic strategies in long-term management of duodenal ulcer: continuous treatment with ranitidine 150 mg after dinner and treatment of duodenal ulcer attacks with ranitidine 300 mg and placebo in the interval. A multicentric, randomized double-blind study was conducted in 399 patients, 197 in the ranitidine group and 202 in the placebo group. Efficacy was judged by the prevalence of ulcer-pain recurrences; secondary criteria were the prevalence of endoscopic recurrences, complications and the number of facultative visits, hospitalizations and days off work related to duodenal ulcer disease. Both groups were similar with regard to main epidemiologic features and number of drop-outs (10.5 percent). Fifty-two patients were withdrawn for symptomatic or endoscopic relapses: 6 in the ranitidine group, 46 in the placebo group (p less than 0.05). Sixty-six percent of the patients remained asymptomatic at one year in the ranitidine group versus 33 percent in the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Seventeen patients with ranitidine (8.6 percent) and 59 with placebo (29.2 percent) experienced at least one endoscopic recurrence (p less than 0.05). In the placebo group, 8 complications were observed (bleeding = 5, duodenal stenosis = 3), and none in the ranitidine group (p less than 0.005). Patients with ranitidine had significantly less facultative visits and endoscopies, number of days off work, and hospitalizations (p less than 0.05). Tolerance was good (5 percent side-effects, all minor) and identical in the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Essential arterial hypertension and quality of life. Comparative crossed double-blind study of labetalol and captopril]. / Hypertension artérielle essentielle et qualité de vie. Essai comparatif en double-insu croisé du labétatol et du captopril.

The purpose of this multicenter randomised, double-blind and cross-over study was to compare the antihypertensive effects of labetalol (L) and captopril (C) in 42 moderate hypertensive patients (mean age: 52 years). The drugs were given during two 4-weeks periods at the end of which the systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were measured at rest in supine and standing positions. The assessment of the quality of life was realized with 4 scales completed by the practitioner [anxiety, depression, well-being, visual analog scale (VAS)] and 4 scales of auto-assessment completed by the patient [2 VAS, well-being, sub-scale of pleasure]. At the end of the first treatment's period (D28), both drugs had decreased significantly supine SBP and DBP (p less than 0.001), standing DBP (L = p less than 0.01; C = p less than 0.05), while only L lowered supine SBP (p less than 0.01). The cross-over analysis was unable to conclude, due to the number of patients and a significant interaction which reduced its power. Thus the effect of the first treatment's period seemed to influence the efficacy of the second one. The percentages of patients with a controlled BP were respectively: after 4 weeks of treatment, L = 61 p. 100 vs C = 42 p. 100 and at the end of study (D56), L = 67 p. 100 vs C = 64 p. 100.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Prospective randomized controlled study of a ceftazidime and pefloxacin combination versus a ceftazidime and amikacin combination in the empirical treatment of pneumonia and nosocomial septicemia at intensive care units]. / Etude prospective randomisée contrôlée de l'association ceftazidime-péfloxacine versus ceftazidime-amikacine dans le traitement empirique des peumonies et septicémies nosocomiales de réanimation.

Three hundred fifty-two patients from 20 intensive care units, suffering from pneumonia or nosocomial septicemia were treated at random with either ceftazidime + pefloxacin (CP) or ceftazidime + amikacin (CA). After exclusion of patients who did not comply with the protocol and of cases where no organism was isolated, 108 assessable patients received CP and 114 received CA. The cure rates achieved in infections due to a single organism were 82 per cent in the CA group and 62 per cent in the CP group. In infections due to multiple organisms, the cure rate was 67 per cent with both antibiotic regimens.

[Efficacy and tolerability of cefuroxime-axetil in infections of the upper respiratory tract. Comparative study with cefadroxil]. / Efficacité et tolérance du céfuroxime-axetil dans les infections des voies aériennes supérieures et de leurs cavités annexes. Etude comparative au céfadroxil.

Cefuroxime-axetil is the first oral broad spectrum cephalosporin to be naturally stable in the presence of bêta-lactamases. The aim of this randomized trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefuroxime-axetil (250 mg twice daily after meal) with cefadroxil (1 g twice daily during meal) for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. In this study 150 patients were enrolled. Before treatment, the two groups were comparable. Clinical success was achieved for 94.3% of the patients treated with cefuroxime-axetil versus 90.4% for cefadroxil. Statistical significance was reached (p less than 0.05) concerning the number of days with facial pain for sinusitis (3 days for the cefuroxime-axetil treated group versus 4 days), the rate of normal tympanum at the second examination (58.3% vs 20% respectively) for otitis, and the number of day with painful dysphagia for tonsillitis (2.6 vs 3.8 days respectively). Cefuroxime-axetil was safe (a few advers events occurred, almost all gastro-intestinal). Cefuroxime-axetil is a safe and effective treatment of upper respiratory tract infections.

[Effect of the time of ingestion of 300 mg of ranitidine on cicatrization of duodenal ulcer in crisis (ingestion after dinner versus ingestion at bedtime]. / Effet de l'horaire de prise de 300 mg de ranitidine sur la cicatrisation de l'ulcère duodénal en poussée (prise en fin de repas du soir versus prise au coucher).

Recent studies have shown that a single dose of ranitidine given for 2 weeks at 6 p.m. resulted in a higher healing rate of duodenal ulcer than the same dose given at 10 p.m. Our study was designed to confirm these results in a large population in France. Three hundred and fifty patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to open treatment with ranitidine 300 mg, immediately after dinner (dinner group), or at bedtime (bedtime group). Endoscopy was performed after 2 and 4 weeks. Forty six patients were excluded from analysis (default: 3, date of endoscopies not respected: 43). Of the 304 patients analysed (mean age: 45.5 years, sex ration M/F: 3.2), 146 received ranitidine after dinner, 158 at bedtime. Age, sex, ethnic groups, smoking habits and alcohol consumption were comparable in the two groups. At endoscopy, before treatment, the mean diameter of ulcers was greater in the bedtime group than in the dinner group (bedtime: 9.6 mm, dinner: 7.9 mm). Healing rates after 2 weeks were 58 p. 100 in the dinner group and 40 p. 100 in the bedtime group (p = 0.002). After 4 weeks treatment, cumulative healing rates were 87.5 p. 100 and 83.5 p. 100, respectively. Smoking had an influence on healing after 2 weeks but not after 4 weeks of treatment. In conclusion, a single dose of 300 mg of ranitidine resulted in a higher healing rate of duodenal ulcer when given immediately after dinner than when given at bedtime.

[Blood pressure control and quality of life: a comparative multicenter double-blind and cross-over trial of labetalol and captopril]. / Contrôle tensionnel et qualité de vie: essai multicentrique comparatif en double-aveugle et croisé du labétalol et du captopril.

The purpose of this multicenter randomised, double-blind and cross-over study was to compare the antihypertensive effects of labetalol (L) and captopril (C) in 42 moderate hypertensive patients (mean age: 52 years). The drugs were given during two 4-weeks periods at the end of which the systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were measured at rest in supine and standing positions. The assessment of the quality of life was realized with 4 scales completed by the practitioner [anxiety, depression, well-being, visual analog scale (VAS)] and 4 scales of auto-assessment completed by the patient [2 VAS, well-being, sub-scale of pleasure]. At the end of the first treatment's period (D28), both drugs had decreased significantly supine SBP and DBP (p less than 0.001), standing DBP (L = p less than 0.01; C = p less than 0.05), while only L lowered supine SBP (p less than 0.01). The cross-over analysis was unable to conclude, due to the number of patients and a significant interaction which reduced its power. Thus the effect of the first treatment's period seemed to influence the efficacy of the second one. The percentages of patients with a controlled BP were respectively: after 4 weeks of treatment, L = 61 p. 100 vs C = 42 p. 100 and at the end of study (D56), L = 67 p. 100 vs C = 64 p. 100. The cross-over analysis didn't show any difference between the effects of L and C on the quality of life.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)