Survival, Attachment, and Healing: An Evolutionary Lens on Interventions for Trauma-Related Dissociation.

Purpose: Dissociation is a necessary part of our threat response system, common to all animal species, normally temporarily activated under conditions of extreme or inescapable threat. Pathological dissociation, however, continues to occur after the initial threat has passed, in response to reminders or inaccessibility of safety and security. Present across the spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses, recurrent dissociative symptoms are linked to severe trauma exposure, insecure attachment, treatment non-response, and maladaptive coping behaviors such as substance use, suicidality, and self-harm. However, empirical studies testing treatments specific to dissociative processes remain scarce. This narrative review summarizes existing studies and provides theoretical, neurobiological, and evolutionary perspectives on dissociative processes and treatments for pathological dissociation. Methods: A systematic search of five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL plus, Scopus) was conducted on April 13, 2023. Peer-reviewed clinical studies with adult participants, assessing intervention effects on dissociative symptoms, were included. Results were thematically analyzed and summarized. Results: Sixty-nine studies were identified, mainly focused on posttraumatic stress disorder, trauma-exposed populations, and borderline personality disorder. Psychotherapy was studied in 72.5% of studies; other interventions included medications and neurostimulation. The majority reported positive outcomes, despite the heterogeneous spectrum of interventions. However, treatment of dissociative symptoms was the primary objective in only a minority. Conclusion: Pathological dissociation is a complex phenomenon involving brain and body systems designed for perceiving and responding to severe threats, requiring an individualized approach. A literature is emerging regarding potentially evidence-based treatments to help those impacted by recurrent dissociative symptoms. When contextualized within a neurobiological and evolutionary perspective, these treatments can be understood as facilitating an internal and/or relational sense of safety, resulting in symptom reduction. Further studies are needed to explore effective treatments for dissociative symptoms.

The landscape of non-psychotic psychiatric illness in rural Canada: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Canada's rural population has diverse demographic features and accounts for 18.9% of Canada's population. Indigenous Peoples (First Nations, Inuit, and Métis), who are highly represented in rural communities, have additional risk factors related to colonialism, and historical and ongoing trauma. Understanding how to best respond to elevated rates of psychiatric illness in rural and remote communities requires an understanding of the unique challenges these communities face in accessing and providing high quality psychiatric services. This article reports a review of published literature on prevalence of non-psychotic psychiatric conditions, as well as the risk and protective factors influencing rates and experience of mental illness in rural and remote communities in Canada to help inform approaches to prevention and treatment. METHODS: This focused narrative review of literature related to rural non-psychotic psychiatric illness in rural and remote Canada published over a 20-year period (October 2001 - February 2023). A review of CINAHL, Medline and Academic Search Complete databases supplemented by gray literature (eg federal and provincial documents, position papers, and clinical practice guidelines) identified by checking reference lists of identified articles, and web searches. A textual narrative approach was used to describe the literature included in the final data set. RESULTS: A total of 32 articles and 13 gray literature documents were identified. Findings were organized and described in relation to depression and anxiety and substance use suicidality and loss; rates for all were noted as elevated in rural communities. Different mental health strategies and approaches were described. Variability in degree of rurality, or proximity to larger metropolitan centers, and different community factors including cohesiveness and industrial basis, were noted to impact mental health risk and highlighted the need for enhancing family physician capacity and responsiveness and innovative community-based interventions, in addition to telepsychiatry. CONCLUSION: Further focus on representative community-based research is critical to expand our knowledge. It is also critical to consider strategies to increase psychiatric care access, including postgraduate medical training and telehealth training.

Interest in Rural Training Experiences in a Canadian Psychiatry Residency Program.

BACKGROUND: With the large majority of mental health professionals concentrated in urban settings, people living in rural and remote areas face significant barriers to accessing mental health care. Recognizing that early exposure is associated with future practice in rural and remote locations, we sought to obtain baseline data regarding interest in expanded rural residency training opportunities and academic teaching. METHODS: In March 2021, all psychiatry residents at the University of Alberta (UofA) were invited to complete a 19-question survey that included both closed-ended (age, gender, year of study, rural experience, interest in rural training, etc.) and open-ended questions (challenges, barriers, academic training, and other comments). A reflexive thematic analysis using an inductive and semantic approach was completed on the comments. RESULTS: 36 residents completed the survey (response rate, 75%). Significant associations were identified between previous rural training experience and interest in rural psychiatry training and practice. Female residents and junior residents were significantly more interested in rural training experiences than their counterparts. Thematic analysis noted concerns with the financial costs of accommodation and transportation, high service burden, continuity of care and isolation from their cohort. Many were interested in academic sessions on the realities of rural practice; approaches to collaborative care; and strategies on culturally relevant care; specifically Indigenous health. CONCLUSIONS: The University of Alberta has highlighted a focus on improving equity and accountability; and with a large rural catchment region; the residency program is well positioned to make training adjustments to diversify training. Based on our findings we have incorporated rural rotations for incoming residents and have developed further rural academic content to support our responsiveness and accountability to the rural and northern communities we are committed to serving. Future research should review the impact of rural training exposure in medical specialties on recruitment and retention as well as on healthcare outcomes.

Psychiatric co-morbidity and asthma: A pilot study utilizing a free use tool to improve asthma care.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of co-morbid psychiatric disorders in asthmatic patients in a Western Canadian Regional Severe Asthma Center. METHODS: A prospective study was completed of patients evaluated through the Edmonton Regional Severe Asthma Clinic (ERSAC). A standardised evaluation, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) screen was used to identify possible psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Twenty-four individuals with moderate to severe asthma, who presented for treatment at ERSAC, were recruited and underwent assessment with the MINI screen. The average patient age was 48 years (range 18-81 years). Nine patients were male and fifteen were female. Twenty subjects (83%) screened positive for a possible psychiatric co-morbidity using the MINI screen. The most common psychiatric co-morbidities identified were post-traumatic stress disorder (50% of the sampled population), depressive episode or persistent depressive disorder (42%), substance/alcohol abuse (33%), generalized anxiety disorder (335), manic episode (25%), agoraphobia (21%), panic disorder (21%) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (17%). Some individuals had more than one concomitant possible psychiatric co-morbidity identified by the MINI screen. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric co-morbidity was confirmed to be common in patients with moderate-severe asthma. In individuals with asthma, the MINI screen appeared to be a simple and useful clinical tool to screen for untreated/sub-optimally-managed psychiatric co-morbidities that may impact management.