Periaqueductal gray matter echogenicity as a marker of migraine chronification: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is one of the most prevalent and disabling medical diseases in the world. The periaqueductal gray matter and the red nucleus play an important role in its pathogenesis. Our aim was to evaluate the echogenicity of the periaqueductal gray matter and the red nucleus in patients with migraine, by means of transcranial ultrasound. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a group of patients with migraine (according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders) and a group of control subjects with comparable age-and-sex distribution were prospectively included. We evaluated the area and echogenicity of the periaqueductal gray matter and the red nucleus by means of transcranial ultrasound, both bedside and posteriorly analyzed with the medical image viewer Horos. RESULTS: We included 115 subjects: 65 patients with migraine (39 of them with chronic migraine and 26 with episodic migraine), and 50 controls. Median disease duration in patients with chronic migraine was 29 (IQR: 19; 40) years, with a median of 18 (IQR: 14; 27) days of migraine per month. The area of the periaqueductal gray matter was larger in patients with chronic migraine compared to episodic migraine and controls (0.15[95%CI 0.12;0.22]cm2; 0.11[95%CI 0.10;0.14]cm2 and 0.12[95%CI 0.09;0.15]cm2, respectively; p = 0.043). Chronic migraine patients showed an intensity of the periaqueductal gray matter echogenicity lower than controls (90.57[95%CI 70.87;117.26] vs 109.56[95%CI 83.30;122.64]; p = 0.035). The coefficient of variation of periaqueductal gray matter echogenicity was the highest in chronic migraine patients (p = 0.009). No differences were observed regarding the area or intensity of red nucleus echogenicity among groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic migraine showed a larger area of echogenicity of periaqueductal gray matter, a lower intensity of its echogenicity and a higher heterogenicity within this brainstem structure compared to patients with episodic migraine and controls. The echogenicity of the periaqueductal gray matter should be further investigated as a biomarker of migraine chronification.

Hypoechogenicity of the raphe nuclei as a biomarker of migraine: A case-control study, review, and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypoechogenicity of the raphe nuclei (hR) has been related to major depression. Comorbidity between migraine and depression is bidirectional postulating a common mechanism of serotonergic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the association between migraine and hR and its role as biomarker of migraine-associated depression and disease severity. METHODS: This is a single-center cross-sectional descriptive study. We included consecutive patients with episodic (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). We collected their comorbidities, analgesic consumption, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), disability, and impact on quality of life associated with migraine. We also included a group of control subjects, matched for age and sex with the patients. In both groups, hR was assessed by means of transcranial sonography. We performed a meta-analysis of the studies investigating the association between migraine and hR. RESULTS: A total of 107 subjects were included (57 cases and 50 controls). hR rate was lower in controls than in migraine patients (22.2% vs. 42.9%, p = .02) with a progressive increase in EM and CM groups respect to the control group (33.3% and 50% vs. 22.2%, respectively; p = .03). Among patients, hR was not associated with depression, higher HADS score, greater migraine-related disability, or higher consumption of analgesic medication. The meta-analysis showed a significant association between migraine and hR (odds ratio = 2.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-3.29). CONCLUSION: hR is more prevalent in migraine patients than in controls and, in our population, its prevalence increases in a stepwise manner in patients with EM and CM. These findings support the role of raphe nuclei in migraine pathophysiology.

Características clínicas de los pacientes con activación de código ictus no identificados por el servicio de emergencias médicas / Clinical characteristics of patients with stroke code activation not identified by the emergency medical service

OBJETIVOS: Determinar la sensibilidad de detección de ictus por parte de los servicios de emergencias médicas (SEM) y analizar las características clínicas de los pacientes con sospecha de ictus no identificados. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Registro prospectivo de pacientes con sospecha de ictus de nuestra área (850.000 habitantes) desde 2011 hasta 2017. Se seleccionó a la población que avisó al SEM. De ésta, se compararon los pacientes con y sin activación de código ictus por parte del SEM (SEM+ frente a SEM-). Se registraron los datos demográficos, el tiempo de evolución, las características clínicas del episodio y el tratamiento de reperfusión administrado. RESULTADOS: De un total de 5.497 pacientes con sospecha de ictus, 2.087 alertaron al SEM: 1.611 (77%) SEM+ y 476 (33%) SEM-. Los pacientes SEM- presentaron menor puntuación en la National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (8 frente a 11) y mayor frecuencia de clínica de territorio vertebrobasilar (14,1% frente a 8,7%) y de clínica hemisférica parcial (23,5% frente a 18,4%), especialmente del hemisferio izquierdo (78,1% frente a 48,4%). Se administró tratamiento de reperfusión en el 29% de los SEM+ y en el 23% de los SEM-. El tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta el tratamiento fue 42 minutos más largo en el grupo de pacientes SEM- (175 frente a 133 minutos). CONCLUSIONES: La sensibilidad del SEM para detectar pacientes con ictus en nuestra serie es del 77%. Hemos identificado características clínicas asociadas a la falta de sensibilidad, como los síntomas de territorio vertebrobasilar o el trastorno de lenguaje aislado

AIMS: To determine the sensitivity of stroke detection by emergency medical services (EMS) and to analyse the clinical characteristics of unidentified patients with suspected stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective register of patients with suspected stroke in our area (850,000 inhabitants) from 2011 to 2017. The population that notified the EMS was selected. Of this population, patients with and without stroke code activation by the EMS were compared (EMS+ versus EMS-). Demographics, time to progression, clinical characteristics of the episode and reperfusion therapy administered were recorded. RESULTS: Of a total of 5,497 patients with suspected stroke, 2,087 alerted the EMS: 1,611 (77%) EMS+ and 476 (33%) EMS-. The EMS- patients presented lower scores on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (8 vs. 11) and a greater frequency of clinical features of the vertebrobasilar territory (14.1% vs. 8.7%) and partial hemispheric clinical features (23.5% vs. 18.4%), especially in the left hemisphere (78.1% vs. 48.4%). Reperfusion treatment was administered in 29% of EMS+ and 23% of EMS-. The time from symptom onset to treatment was 42 minutes longer in the EMS group (175 versus 133 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of EMS to detect stroke patients in our series is 77%. We have identified clinical features associated with lack of sensitivity, such as vertebrobasilar territory symptoms or isolated language disorder