Maturational effect of leptin on CO2 chemosensitivity in newborn rats.

BACKGROUND: Leptin augments central CO2 chemosensitivity and stabilizes breathing in adults. Premature infants have unstable breathing and low leptin levels. Leptin receptors are on CO2 sensitive neurons in the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius (NTS) and locus coeruleus (LC). We hypothesized that exogenous leptin improves hypercapnic respiratory response in newborn rats by improving central CO2 chemosensitivity. METHODS: In rats at postnatal day (p)4 and p21, hyperoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses, and pSTAT and SOCS3 protein expression in the hypothalamus, NTS and LC were measured before and after treatment with exogenous leptin (6 µg/g). RESULTS: Exogenous leptin increased the hypercapnic response in p21 but not in p4 rats (P ≤ 0.001). At p4, leptin increased pSTAT expression only in the LC, and SOCS3 expression in the NTS and LC; while at p21 pSTAT and SOCS3 levels were higher in the hypothalamus, NTS, and LC (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We describe the developmental profile of the effect of exogenous leptin on CO2 chemosensitivity. Exogenous leptin does not augment central CO2 sensitivity during the first week of life in newborn rats. The translational implication of these findings is that low plasma leptin levels in premature infants may not be contributing to respiratory instability. IMPACT: Exogenous leptin does not augment CO2 sensitivity during the first week of life in newborn rats, similar to the developmental period when feeding behavior is resistant to leptin. Exogenous leptin increases CO2 chemosensitivity in newborn rats after the 3rd week of life and upregulates the expression of pSTAT and SOC3 in the hypothalamus, NTS and LC. Low plasma leptin levels in premature infants are unlikely contributors to respiratory instability via decreased CO2 sensitivity in premature infants. Thus, it is highly unlikely that exogenous leptin would alter this response.

Nonmuscle myosin IIB is a driver of cellular reprogramming.

Nonmuscle myosin IIB (NMIIB) is considered a primary force generator during cell motility. Yet many cell types, including motile cells, do not necessarily express NMIIB. Given the potential of cell engineering for the next wave of technologies, adding back NMIIB could be a strategy for creating supercells with strategically altered cell morphology and motility. However, we wondered what unforeseen consequences could arise from such an approach. Here, we leveraged pancreatic cancer cells, which do not express NMIIB. We generated a series of cells where we added back NMIIB and strategic mutants that increase the ADP-bound time or alter the phosphorylation control of bipolar filament assembly. We characterized the cellular phenotypes and conducted RNA-seq analysis. The addition of NMIIB and the different mutants all have specific consequences for cell morphology, metabolism, cortical tension, mechanoresponsiveness, and gene expression. Major modes of ATP production are shifted, including alterations in spare respiratory capacity and the dependence on glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation. Several metabolic and growth pathways undergo significant changes in gene expression. This work demonstrates that NMIIB is highly integrated with many cellular systems and simple cell engineering has a profound impact that extends beyond the primary contractile activity presumably being added to the cells.

Cancer as a biophysical disease: Targeting the mechanical-adaptability program.

With the number of cancer cases projected to significantly increase over time, researchers are currently exploring "nontraditional" research fields in the pursuit of novel therapeutics. One emerging area that is steadily gathering interest revolves around cellular mechanical machinery. When looking broadly at the physical properties of cancer, it has been debated whether a cancer could be defined as either stiffer or softer across cancer types. With numerous articles supporting both sides, the evidence instead suggests that cancer is not particularly regimented. Instead, cancer is highly adaptable, allowing it to endure the constantly changing microenvironments cancer cells encounter, such as tumor compression and the shear forces in the vascular system and body. What allows cancer cells to achieve this adaptability are the particular proteins that make up the mechanical network, leading to a particular mechanical program of the cancer cell. Coincidentally, some of these proteins, such as myosin II, α-actinins, filamins, and actin, have either altered expression in cancer and/or some type of direct involvement in cancer progression. For this reason, targeting the mechanical system as a therapeutic strategy may lead to more efficacious treatments in the future. However, targeting the mechanical program is far from trivial. As involved as the mechanical program is in cancer development and metastasis, it also helps drive many other key cellular processes, such as cell division, cell adhesion, metabolism, and motility. Therefore, anti-cancer treatments targeting the mechanical program must take great care to avoid potential side effects. Here, we introduce the potential of targeting the mechanical program while also providing its challenges and shortcomings as a strategy for cancer treatment.

The mechanobiome: a goldmine for cancer therapeutics.

Cancer progression is dependent on heightened mechanical adaptation, both for the cells' ability to change shape and to interact with varying mechanical environments. This type of adaptation is dependent on mechanoresponsive proteins that sense and respond to mechanical stress, as well as their regulators. Mechanoresponsive proteins are part of the mechanobiome, which is the larger network that constitutes the cell's mechanical systems that are also highly integrated with many other cellular systems, such as gene expression, metabolism, and signaling. Despite the altered expression patterns of key mechanobiome proteins across many different cancer types, pharmaceutical targeting of these proteins has been overlooked. Here, we review the biochemistry of key mechanoresponsive proteins, specifically nonmuscle myosin II, α-actinins, and filamins, as well as the partnering proteins 14-3-3 and CLP36. We also examined a wide range of data sets to assess how gene and protein expression levels of these proteins are altered across many different cancer types. Finally, we determined the potential of targeting these proteins to mitigate invasion or metastasis and suggest that the mechanobiome is a goldmine of opportunity for anticancer drug discovery and development.