The influence of lift frequency, lift duration and work experience on discomfort reporting.

Discomfort surveys are commonly used to assess risk in the workplace and prioritize jobs for interventions before an injury or illness occurs. However, discomfort is a subjective measure and the relationship of discomfort to work-related factors is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to understand how reports of discomfort relate to work-related risk factors for the low back. A total of 12 novice and 12 experienced manual materials handlers performed repetitive, asymmetric lifts at different load levels and at six different lift frequencies throughout an 8-h exposure period. Discomfort was recorded hourly throughout the day. Analyses were performed to determine which experimental factors influenced reporting of discomfort and if discomfort trends matched spine loading trends. Novice lifters reported significantly higher discomfort levels than experienced subjects. They also reported increases in discomfort as moment exposure increased and as the exposure time increased. Novices lifting at 8 Nm load moment level reported increased discomfort from 0.07 to 0.63 by the end of the day, at 36 Nm they reported an increase from 0.04 to 0.40 and at 85 Nm they reported an increase from 0.37 to 3.06. Experienced subjects, on the other hand, reported low levels of discomfort regardless of moment exposure, lift frequency or exposure duration. The reported discomforts were generally unrelated to the biomechanical loading on the spine. Discomfort reporting appears to be more a reflection of experience than of work risk factor exposure. Experienced subjects may have more efficient motor patterns, which reduce spinal load and thus discomfort. Novice subjects seemed to have a lower threshold of discomfort. Caution is needed when using discomfort reporting as a means to identify jobs in need of interventions, in that biomechanical loading may not be accurately represented. Discomfort should only be used as a supplement to objective measures, such as spinal loading, to assess the risk of low back disorders.

The effects of work experience, lift frequency and exposure duration on low back muscle oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown changes in low back muscle oxygenation after static muscle contractions or short-term dynamic lifting exertions. The aim of this study was to document the changes in low back muscle oxygenation during prolonged lifting activity over an entire workday as of function of work experience and lift frequency. METHODS: Four novice and six experienced subjects participated in a lifting study in which they lifted load with a given weight at one of five different frequencies (2, 4, 8, 10, 12 lifts/min) for an 8-h period. Oxygen saturation of the left and right erector spinae was measured continuously and non-invasively using near-infrared spectroscopy during each lifting session. FINDINGS: Exposure duration had a statistically significant effect on muscle oxygenation level (P<0.0001). Oxygen saturation in the erector spinae increased during the 8-h lifting period. As lift frequency increased, back muscle oxygenation in experienced subjects also increased. In general, the increase in muscle oxygenation for experienced subjects was less than that for novice subjects. INTERPRETATION: This study suggested that the requirement of oxygen for the low back muscle in a typical industrial lifting job increased over time and experienced workers responded differently from the novice subjects. These findings may provide more insight into the physiological changes of the working muscle and the potential risks of developing muscle injury.

Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Psychosocial stressors have been associated with low back pain reporting. However, response to psychosocial risk factors may be dependent on the individual's personality type that, in turn, can affect muscle recruitment and spine loading. This study explores how personality might be associated with spine loading during repetitive lifting performed throughout an entire work shift. PURPOSE: Assess spine loading as a function of an individual's personality type during repetitive, long-term exposure to a materials handling tasks. STUDY DESIGN: Laboratory experiment where experienced and inexperienced participants performed repetitive, asymmetric lifts at various load and lift frequency levels throughout a series of 8-hour exposure periods. Spine loads were monitored throughout the work period. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve novice and 12 experienced materials handlers who were asymptomatic for back pain. OUTCOME MEASURES: Spine compression, anterior-posterior (A/P) shear, and lateral shear at the L5-S1 level. METHODS: Participants were categorized into personality types based upon the Myers-Briggs personality type indicator. An electromyography-assisted biomechanical model was used to assess spine compression, A/P shear, and lateral shear throughout the exposure period. RESULTS: The results indicate that intuitors had higher shear spinal loading regardless of moment exposure, lift frequency, and time through the work period, compared with the sensor personality type. In addition, higher spine compressive and shear forces occurred in the perceiver personality compared with the judgers' personality trait, regardless of moment and, often, lift frequency. Novice lifters typically experienced greater spine loading. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that when there exists a personality-job environment mismatch, spinal loading increases via an increase in antagonistic co-contraction. The trends suggest that inherent personality characteristics may play a role in one's motor control strategies when performing a repetitive lifting task.