Severe mold fungal infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic put an unprecedented strain on modern societies and healthcare systems. A significantly higher incidence of invasive fungal co-infections was noted compared with the pre-COVID-19 era, adding new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the critical care setting. In the current narrative review, we focus on invasive mold infections caused by Aspergillus and Mucor species in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We discuss up-to-date information on the incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of these mold-COVID-19 co-infections, as well as recommendations on preventive and prophylactic interventions. Traditional risk factors were often not recognized in COVID-19-associated aspergillosis and mucormycosis, highlighting the role of other determinant risk factors. The associated patient outcomes were worse compared with COVID-19 patients without mold co-infection.

Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Saprophytic Molds: Can They Be Used to Detect Resistance?

Commercial tests are often employed in clinical microbiology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been defined in order to detect non-wild-type (NWT) isolates harboring resistance mechanisms. We reviewed the literature in order to find studies where commercial methods were used to evaluate for in vitro susceptibility of filamentous fungi and assess their ability to detect NWT isolates according to the available ECVs. Data were found for the gradient concentration strips Etest and MIC Test Strips (MTS), broth microdilution Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), Micronaut-AM and the agar dilution VIPcheck assays. Applying itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole Etest ECVs for A. fumigatus, Etest was able to detect 90.3% (84/93), 61.2% (90/147) and 86% (31/36) of isolates with known cyp51A mutations, respectively. Moreover, Etest also was able to detect 3/3 fks mutants using caspofungin ECVs and 2/3 micafungin mutant isolates. Applying the voriconazole and posaconazole SYO ECVs, 57.7% (67/116) and 100% (47/47) of mutants with known cyp51A substitutions were classified as NWT, respectively. VIPcheck detected 90.3% (159/176), 80.1% (141/176) and 66% (141/176)of mutants via itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, respectively, whereas Micronaut-AM detected 88% (22/25). In conclusion, Etest posaconazole and itraconazole, as well as micafungin and caspofungin ECVs, detected A. fumigatus mutants. On the other hand, while the posaconazole SYO ECV was able to detect cyp51A mutants, similar data were not observed with the SYO voriconazole ECV.

Severe Candida infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

The frequency of co-infections with bacterial or fungal pathogens has constantly increased among critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the pandemic. Candidemia was the most frequently reported invasive fungal co-infection. The onset of candidemia in COVID-19 patients was often delayed compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Additionally, Candida invasive infections in COVID-19 patients were more often linked to invasive procedures (e.g., invasive mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy) during the intensive care stay and the severity of illness rather than more "classic" risk factors present in patients without COVID-19 (e.g., underlying diseases and prior hospitalization). Moreover, apart from the increased incidence of candidemia during the pandemic, a worrying rise in fluconazole-resistant strains was reported, including a rise in the multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Regarding outcomes, the development of invasive Candida co-infection had a negative impact, increasing morbidity and mortality compared to non-co-infected COVID-19 patients. In this narrative review, we present and critically discuss information on the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal infections caused by Candida spp. in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Assessing Clinical Potential of Old Antibiotics against Severe Infections by Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Using In Silico Modelling.

In the light of increasing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria and the lack of new more potent antimicrobial agents, new strategies have been explored. Old antibiotics, such as colistin, temocillin, fosfomycin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and chloramphenicol, have attracted the attention since they often exhibit in vitro activity against multi-drug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. The current review provides a summary of the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics and PK/PD characteristics of old antibiotics. In silico modelling was then performed using Monte Carlo simulation in order to combine all preclinical data with human pharmacokinetics and determine the probability of target (1-log kill in thigh/lung infection animal models) attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens. The potential of clinical efficacy of a drug against severe infections by MDR gram-negative bacteria was considered when PTA was >95% at the epidemiological cutoff values of corresponding species. In vitro potent activity against MDR gram-negative pathogens has been shown for colistin, polymyxin B, temocillin (against E. coli and K. pneumoniae), fosfomycin (against E. coli), mecillinam (against E. coli), minocycline (against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii), and chloramphenicol (against E. coli) with ECOFF or MIC90 ≤ 16 mg/L. When preclinical PK/PD targets were combined with human pharmacokinetics, Monte Carlo analysis showed that among the old antibiotics analyzed, there is clinical potential for polymyxin B against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii; for temocillin against K. pneumoniae and E. coli; for fosfomycin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae; and for mecillinam against E. coli. Clinical studies are needed to verify the potential of those antibiotics to effectively treat infections by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria.

Pharmacodynamics of colistin resistance in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: the double-edged sword of heteroresistance and adaptive resistance.

Introduction. The presence of heteroresistant subpopulations and the development of resistance during drug exposure (adaptive resistance) limits colistin's efficacy against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp) isolates.Hypothesis/Gap statement. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of both types of colistin resistance against CP-Kp are unknown.Aim. We therefore studied the PK/PD characteristics of colistin resistance in an in vitro PK/PD model simulating clinical colistin exposures.Methods. Two K. pneumoniae clinical isolates, one non-CP-Kp and one CP-Kp, with colistin MICs of 0.5-1 mg l-1 at a final inoculum of 107 c.f.u. ml-1 were used in an in vitro PK/PD dialysis/diffusion closed model simulating 4.5 MU q12h and 3 MU q8h clinical dosing regimens. Heteroresistant (HRS, bacteria with stable high-level resistance present before drug exposure) and adaptive resistant (ARS, bacteria with reversible low-level resistance emerging after drug exposure) subpopulations were measured and optimal PK/PD targets for reducing both ARS and HRS were determined. Cumulative fractional response (CFR) was calculated with Monte Carlo simulation for 9 MU q24h, 4.5 MU q12h and 3 MU q8h clinical dosing regimens.Results. A 2-5 log10c.f.u. ml-1 decrease of the total bacterial population was observed within the first 2 h of exposure, followed by regrowth at 12 h. Colistin exposure was positively and negatively correlated with HRS and ARS 24-0 h c.f.u. ml-1 changes, respectively. An optimal PK/PD (~0.5log10 increase) target of 35 fAUC/MIC (the ratio of the area under the unbound concentration-time curve to the MIC) was found for reducing both HRS and ARS of high-level resistance (MIC >16 mg l-1). The 4.5 MU q12h regimen had slightly higher CFR (74 %) compared to the other dosing regimens.Conclusions. High colistin exposures reduced high-level adaptive resistance at the expense of selection of heteroresistant subpopulations.

In vitro comparative activity of the new beta-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam with cefepime or meropenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae and cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa metallo-beta-lactamase-producing clinical isolates.

Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria are increasing worldwide and very few agents are active against these pathogens. Taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) is a newly developed bicyclic boronate beta-lactamase inhibitor that directly inhibits all four Ambler classes of beta-lactamases. In the present study the in vitro activity of cefepime or meropenem combined with taniborbactam against 100 Klebsiella pneumoniae and cefepime combined with taniborbactam against 100 Pseudomonas aeruginosa molecularly characterized MBL-producing strains were investigated using ISO standard broth microdilution assays and compared with a panel of antimicrobial agents that are used in clinical practice (amikacin, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, tigecycline, ceftolozane-tazobactam, cefepime-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam). For K. pneumoniae isolates, the MIC90 values were ≥64 mg/L for all drugs except cefepime-taniborbactam (16 mg/L; 87% inhibited at ≤8/4 mg/L), meropenem-taniborbactam (4 mg/L; 94% inhibited at ≤8/4 mg/L) and tigecycline (8 mg/L), with high levels of resistance (≥65%) found for all approved comparator antimicrobials tested. For P. aeruginosa, the MIC90 values were ≥64 mg/L for all drugs except aztreonam (32 mg/L), cefepime-taniborbactam (32 mg/L; 88% inhibited at ≤16/4 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (32 mg/L), with high levels of resistance (≥73%) for all approved drugs except aztreonam (27%). Taniborbactam reduced cefepime and meropenem MICs by a median 5 and 7 two-fold dilutions to ≤8 mg/L in 87% and 94% of MBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, and cefepime MICs by a median 5 two-fold dilutions to ≤16 mg/L in 86% of MBL-producing P. aeruginosa, respectively. The combinations cefepime-taniborbactam and meropenem-taniborbactam are promising alternative treatment options for infections by MBL-producing isolates.