Hip Fracture Care in Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of 1,239 Patients.

Introduction: Compared to other patients, Parkinson disease (PD) patients may experience suboptimal outcomes after hip fracture. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare characteristics and outcomes of hip fracture patients with PD to those without PD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients admitted for hip fracture within a large healthcare system between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019. Demographics, injury characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), treatment characteristics, and outcomes including complications, readmissions, and mortality were extracted. Patients with PD were compared to those without PD. Chi-square tests, two-sample t-tests, and Fisher exact tests were conducted to identify group differences. Results: A total of 1239 patients were included (4.0% PD and 96.0% non-PD). PD patients were mostly male (59.2%) compared to mostly female non-PD patients 69.4%, P < .001). PD patients on average had a higher CCI (2.3 vs 1.7, P = .040) and more frequently had dementia (42.9% vs 26.7%, P = .013). No PD patients were discharged home without additional assistance compared to 8.1% of patients without PD. More PD patients were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) than non-PD patients (65.3% vs 48.2%, P = .021). Only 22.4% of PD patients were previously prescribed osteoporosis medication, and only 16.3% were referred for osteoporosis follow-up after fracture. In-house complications, readmissions, and mortality up to 1 year were comparable between groups (P>.191). Conclusions: Outcomes between PD patients and non-PD patients were mostly equivalent, but more PD patients required discharge to a higher-level care environment compared to non-PD patients. Although PD seems to be a risk factor for hip fracture regardless of age and sex, most patients had not undergone proper screening or preventative treatment for osteoporosis. These results emphasize the need for early bone health evaluation, multidisciplinary collaboration, and care coordination in preventing and treating hip fractures in PD.

Longitudinal Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Measures Over 3 Years in Patients with Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) is a publicly available health-related quality-of-life measurement system. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of Neuro-QoL item banks as outcome measures for clinical trials in Parkinson's disease. METHODS: An analysis of Neuro-QoL responsiveness to change and construct validity was performed in a multicenter clinical trial cohort. RESULTS: Among 310 participants over 3 years, changes in five of eight Neuro-QoL domains were significant (P < 0.05) but very modest. The largest effect sizes were seen in the cognition and mobility domains (0.35-0.39). The largest effect size for change over the year in which levodopa was initiated was -0.19 for lower extremity function-mobility. For a similarly designed clinical trial, estimated sample size required to demonstrate a 50% reduction in worsening ranged from 420 to more than 1000 participants per group. CONCLUSIONS: More sensitive tools will be required to serve as an outcome measure in early Parkinson's disease. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Integrated Care in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD) is affected by motor and nonmotor symptoms, necessitating an integrated care approach. Existing care models vary considerably in numerous domains. The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of PD integrated care models and develop recommendations for a representative model. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published integrated care models and a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials examining integrated care versus standard care. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life using a validated PD scale. We evaluated levels of care integration using the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications were identified, including 8 randomized, controlled trials with health-related quality of life data (n = 1,149 total PD patients). Qualitative evaluation of individual care model integration guided by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care revealed frequent clinical and professional integration, but infrequent organizational and population-based integration elements. Meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials revealed significant heterogeneity (I2 = 90%, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis including only outpatient care models (n = 5) indicated homogeneity of effects (I2 = 0%, P = 0.52) and improved health-related quality of life favoring integrated care, with a small effect size (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.17; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.03; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient integrated PD care models may improve patient-reported health-related quality of life compared with standard care; however, because of variable methodological approaches and a high risk of bias related to inherent difficulties in study design (eg, blinding of participants and interventionists), generalizability of these results are difficult to establish. The Rainbow Model of Integrated Care is a promising method of evaluating elements and levels of integration from individual patient care to population health in a PD context. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Recommendations for the Organization of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care Teams in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management in expert centers for Parkinson's disease (PD) usually involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary approach. However, there is no guideline specifying how this model should be organized. Consequently, the nature of multidisciplinary care varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To optimize care delivery, we aimed to provide recommendations for the organization of multidisciplinary care in PD. METHODS: Twenty expert centers in the field of multidisciplinary PD care participated. Their leading neurologists completed a survey covering eight themes: elements for optimal multidisciplinary care; team members; role of patients and care partners; team coordination; team meetings; inpatient versus outpatient care; telehealth; and challenges towards multidisciplinary care. During a consensus meeting, outcomes were incorporated into concept recommendations that were reviewed by each center's multidisciplinary team. Three patient organizations rated the recommendations according to patient priorities. Based on this feedback, a final set of recommendations (essential elements for delivery of multidisciplinary care) and considerations (desirable elements) was developed. RESULTS: We developed 30 recommendations and 10 considerations. The patient organizations rated the following recommendations as most important: care is organized in a patient-centered way; every newly diagnosed patient has access to a core multidisciplinary team; and each team has a coordinator. A checklist was created to further facilitate its implementation. CONCLUSION: We provide a practical tool to improve multidisciplinary care for persons with PD at the organizational level. Future studies should focus on implementing these recommendations in clinical practice, evaluating their potential applicability and effectiveness, and comparing alternative models of PD care.

Sex differences by design and outcome in the Safety of Urate Elevation in PD (SURE-PD) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether women and men with Parkinson disease (PD) differ in their biochemical and clinical responses to long-term treatment with inosine. METHODS: The Safety of Urate Elevation in Parkinson's Disease (SURE-PD) trial enrolled 75 people with early PD and baseline serum urate below 6 mg/dL and randomized them to 3 double-blinded treatment arms: oral placebo or inosine titrated to produce mild (6.1-7.0 mg/dL) or moderate (7.1-8.0 mg/dL) serum urate elevation for up to 2 years. Parkinsonism, serum urate, and plasma antioxidant capacity were measured at baseline and repeatedly on treatment; CSF urate was assessed once, at 3 months. Here in secondary analyses results are stratified by sex. RESULTS: Inosine produced an absolute increase in average serum urate from baseline that was 50% greater in women (3.0 mg/dL) than in men (2.0 mg/dL), consistent with expected lower baseline levels in women. Similarly, only among women was CSF urate significantly greater on mild or moderate inosine (+87% [p < 0.001] and +98% [p < 0.001], respectively) than on placebo (in contrast to men: +10% [p = 0.6] and +14% [p = 0.4], respectively). Women in the higher inosine dosing group showed a 7.0 Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) points/year lower rate of decline vs placebo (p = 0.01). In women, slower rates of UPDRS change were associated with greater increases in serum urate (r = -0.52; p = 0.001), and with greater increases in plasma antioxidant capacity (r = -0.44; p = 0.006). No significant associations were observed in men. CONCLUSIONS: Inosine produced greater increases in serum and CSF urate in women compared to men in the SURE-PD trial, consistent with the study's design and with preliminary evidence for slower clinical decline in early PD among women treated with urate-elevating doses of inosine. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00833690. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that inosine produced greater urate elevation in women than men and may slow PD progression in women.

What predicts falls in Parkinson disease?: Observations from the Parkinson's Foundation registry.

BACKGROUND: We undertook this study to identify patients with Parkinson disease (PD) with no or rare falls who may progress to frequent falling by their next annual follow-up visit. METHODS: We analyzed data in the National Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative database to identify factors predicting which patients with PD with no or rare falls at the baseline visit will report at least monthly falls at the annual follow-up visit. Multivariable models were constructed using logistic regression. Variables were introduced in 4 blocks: in the 1st block, variables present at or before the baseline visit were entered; in the 2nd, baseline visit assessments; in the 3rd, interventions implemented during baseline visit; and, in the 4th block, changes in comorbidities, living situation, and treatment between visits. RESULTS: Of 3,795 eligible participants, 3,276 (86.3%) reported no or rare falls at baseline visit, and of them, 382 (11.7%) reported at least monthly falls at follow-up visit. Predictors included female sex, <90% diagnostic certainty, motor fluctuations, levodopa treatment, antidepressant treatment, prior deep brain stimulation (DBS), worse quality of life, Hoehn & Yahr stage 2 or 3, worse semantic fluency, and, between visits, addition of amantadine, referral to occupational therapy, social services, or DBS, new diagnoses of cancer or osteoarthritis, and increased emergency visits. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis identified several predictors of progression to falling in PD. Such identifiers may help target patient subgroups for falls prevention intervention. Some factors are modifiable, offering opportunities for developing such interventions.

Factors associated with falling in early, treated Parkinson's disease: The NET-PD LS1 cohort.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing the factors associated with falling in Parkinson's disease (PD) would improve identification of at-risk individuals. OBJECTIVE: To examine frequency of falling and baseline characteristics associated with falling in PD using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Exploratory Trials in PD Long-term Study-1 (NET-PD LS-1) dataset. METHODS: The LS-1 database included 1741 early treated PD subjects (median 4year follow-up). Baseline characteristics were tested for a univariate association with post-baseline falling during the trial. Significant variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. A separate analysis using a negative binomial model investigated baseline factors on fall rate. RESULTS: 728 subjects (42%) fell during the trial, including at baseline. A baseline history of falls was the factor most associated with post-baseline falling. Men had lower odds of post-baseline falling compared to women, but for men, the probability of a post-baseline fall increased with age such that after age 70, men and women had similar odds of falling. Other baseline factors associated with a post-baseline fall and increased fall rate included the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score, total functional capacity (TFC), baseline ambulatory capacity score and dopamine agonist monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Falls are common in early treated PD. The biggest risk factor for falls in PD remains a history of falling. Measures of functional ability (UPDRS ADL, TFC) and ambulatory capacity are novel clinical risk factors needing further study. A significant age by sex interaction may help to explain why age has been an inconsistent risk factor for falls in PD.

Cognitive function in 1736 participants in NINDS Exploratory Trials in PD Long-term Study-1.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical cohort studies suggest that mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is common in early Parkinson's disease (PD). The objectives of this paper were to describe cognitive function in a large clinical trial of early treated PD patients at baseline and over time using two brief cognitive screening tests. METHODS: In total 1741 participants were enrolled in the NINDS Exploratory Trials in Parkinson's disease (NET-PD) Long-term Study-1 (LS-1). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) was collected annually. The SCales for Outcomes in PArkinson's disease-COGnition (SCOPA-COG) was collected at baseline and at year 5. The trial was stopped early based on a planned interim analysis after half the cohort completed 5 years of follow-up. The median length of follow-up was 4 years (range 3-6 years). Predictors of cognitive change were examined using cross sectional (baseline) and longitudinal multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: The mean (SD) change from baseline to 5 years was -1.9 (5.1) for the SCOPA-COG and -2.1 (11.1) for the SDMT. Age and baseline UPDRS motor scores were associated with a more rapid decline in SDMT scores and 5 year SCOPA-COG scores. Male gender was associated with more rapid decline in SDMT. Self-reported income was a novel predictor of baseline cognitive function, even adjusted for educational status, although not significantly associated with change over time. CONCLUSION: This large prospective cohort study demonstrated mild cognitive decline in early treated Parkinson's disease. The study identified income level as a novel predictor of cognitive function.

Validation of an ambulatory capacity measure in Parkinson disease: a construct derived from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.

BACKGROUND: A construct calculated as the sum of items 13-15, 29, 30 of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has been used as an "Ambulatory Capacity Measure" (ACM) in Parkinson disease (PD). Its construct validity has never been examined. A similar construct, consisting of the mean value of the same UPDRS items has been used under the acronym PIGD as a measure of postural instability and gait disorder in PD. OBJECTIVE: To examine the construct validity of the ACM and PIGD in PD. METHODS: We analyzed data in an existing database of 340 PD patients, Hoehn and Yahr stages (HYS) 1-5 who participated in a study of falls. Number of falls (NOF) was recorded over 4 weeks, and UPDRS (mental, ADL, and motor subscales), HYS, Activities Based Confidence Scale (ABC), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand (FTSS), Timed Up-and Go (TUG), Gait Velocity (GV), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) evaluations were performed. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed through correlations of the ACM and PIGD to these measures and to their summed-ranks. A coefficient of determination was calculated through linear regression. RESULTS: Mean age was 71.4, mean age at diagnosis 61.4 years; 46% were women; mean UPDRS subscale scores were: Mental 3.7; ADL 15.7; motor: 27.1; mean ACM was 6.51, and mean PIGD 1.30. Cronbach's alpha was 0.78 for both ACM and PIGD. Spearman correlation coefficients between the ACM/PIGD and ABC, FOG, TUG, GV and BBS were 0.69, 0.72, 0.67, 0.58, and 0.70 respectively. Correlation between the ACM/PIGD and summed-ranks of HYS, NOF, ABC, FOG, FTSS, TUG, GV and BBS was high (Spearman r = 0.823, p < 0.0001); 68% of the variability in the summed-ranks was explained by ACM/PIGD. CONCLUSION: The ACM and the PIGD are valid global measures and accurately reflect the combined effects of the various components of ambulatory capacity in PD patients with HY stages 1-4.

Measuring disease progression in early Parkinson disease: the National Institutes of Health Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease (NET-PD) experience.

IMPORTANCE: Optimizing assessments of rate of progression in Parkinson disease (PD) is important in designing clinical trials, especially of potential disease-modifying agents. OBJECTIVE: To examine the value of measures of impairment, disability, and quality of life in assessing progression in early PD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Inception cohort analysis of data from 413 patients with early, untreated PD who were enrolled in 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trials. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatments (67 received creatine, 66 received minocycline, 71 received coenzyme Q10, 71 received GPI-1485, and 138 received placebo). We assessed the association between the rates of change in measures of impairment, disability, and quality of life and time to initiation of symptomatic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time between baseline assessment and need for the initiation of symptomatic pharmaceutical treatment for PD was the primary indicator of disease progression. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline confounding variables with regard to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II score, the UPDRS Part III score, the modified Rankin Scale score, level of education, and treatment group, we assessed the rate of change for the following measurements: the UPDRS Part II score; the UPDRS Part III score; the Schwab and England Independence Scale score (which measures activities of daily living); the Total Functional Capacity scale; the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, summary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Summary and Mental Summary. Variables reaching the statistical threshold in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model using time to symptomatic treatment as the dependent variable. More rapid change (ie, worsening) in the UPDRS Part II score (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22] for 1 scale unit change per 6 months), the UPDRS Part III score (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.13] for 1 scale unit change per 6 months), and the Schwab and England Independence Scale score (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.12-1.48] for 5 percentage point change per 6 months) was associated with earlier need for symptomatic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: AND RELEVANCE In early PD, the UPDRS Part II score and Part III score and the Schwab and England Independence Scale score can be used to measure disease progression, whereas the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire and summary index, Total Functional Capacity scale, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Summary and Mental Summary are not sensitive to change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00063193 and NCT00076492.

Falls in Parkinson disease: analysis of a large cross-sectional cohort.

BACKGROUND: Falls remain a significant cause of morbidity in PD. Risk factors are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: In this study we explore risk factors for falls in PD utilizing the cross-sectional, baseline data in the National Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative (NPF-QII) database. Subjects are being followed prospectively, and this study will provide the basis for subsequent longitudinal analyses. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of data from 2,876 ambulatory patients with Parkinson disease enrolled in the NPF-QII at 18 sites. Main outcome measure was falling history in the 3 months preceding assessment. The following were considered as possible predictor variables: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, disease duration, age at disease onset, investigator's confidence in the diagnosis, Hoehn and Yahr stage, rest tremor, ability to stand unassisted, coexistent pathologies (cardiovascular, respiratory, diabetes, cancer, neurological, osteoarthritis, and "other" comorbidities), anticholinergics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, cognitive enhancers, deep brain stimulation surgery, timed-up-and-go, semantic fluency, and 5 word recall. Variables with associations to the outcome measure in univariate analyses were analyzed in multivariable models using logistic regression. RESULTS: 37.2% of subjects experienced falls. In the multivariable regression model the following variables were found to be independently associated with falls: disease duration; Hoehn and Yahr stage; absence of rest tremor; cardiovascular, arthritis, or "other" comorbidity; antidepressants; deep brain stimulation surgery; timed-up-and-go; and, semantic fluency. CONCLUSION: Disease duration but not age is independently associated with falls in Parkinson disease. Timed-up-and-go accurately reflects falls risk. Impaired semantic fluency is independently associated with falls, while verbal memory is not. Comorbidities, antidepressants, and deep brain stimulation also contribute to falls risk.

Hospitalization in Parkinson disease: a survey of National Parkinson Foundation Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To explore current practices and opinions regarding hospital management of Parkinson disease (PD) patients in specialized PD Centers. METHODS: Fifty-one out of 54 National Parkinson Foundation (NPF) Centers worldwide completed an online survey regarding hospitalization of PD patients. RESULTS: Many Centers were concerned about the quality of PD-specific care provided to their patients when hospitalized. Primary concerns were adherence to the outpatient medication schedule and poor understanding by hospital staff of medications that worsen PD. Few Centers had a policy with their primary hospital that notified them when their patients were admitted. Rather, notification of hospitalization came often from the patient or a family member. Several Centers (29%) reported not finding out about a hospitalization until a routine clinic visit after discharge. Quick access to outpatient PD care following discharge was a problem in many Centers. Elective surgery, fall/fracture, infection, and mental status changes, were identified as common reasons for hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: There is a perceived need for PD specialists to be involved during hospitalization of their patients. Improvement in communication between hospitals and PD Centers is necessary so that hospital clinicians can take advantage of PD specialists' expertise. Education of hospital staff and clinicians regarding management of PD, complications of PD, and medications to avoid in PD is critical. Most importantly, outpatient access to PD specialists needs to be improved, which may prevent unnecessary hospitalizations in these patients.

Management of the hospitalized patient with Parkinson's disease: current state of the field and need for guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature and to identify practice gaps in the management of the hospitalized Parkinson's disease (PD) patient. BACKGROUND: Patients with PD are admitted to hospitals at higher rates, and frequently have longer hospital stays than the general population. Little is known about outpatient interventions that might reduce the need for hospitalization and also reduce hospital-related complications. METHODS: A literature review was performed on PubMed about hospitalization and PD between 1970 and 2010. In addition, in press peer-reviewed papers or published abstracts known to the authors were included. Information was reviewed by a National Parkinson Foundation workgroup and a narrative review article was generated. RESULTS: Motor disturbances in PD are believed to be a causal factor in the higher rates of admissions and complications. However, other conditions are commonly recorded as the primary reason for hospitalization including motor complications, reduced mobility, lack of compliance, inappropriate use of neuroleptics, falls, fractures, pneumonia, and other important medical problems. There are many relevant issues related to hospitalization in PD. Medications, dosages and specific dosage schedules are critical. Staff training regarding medications and medication management may help to avoid complications, particularly those related to reduced mobility, and aspiration pneumonia. Treatment of infections and a return to early mobility is also critical to management. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs, recommendations, and guidelines are needed to better train interdisciplinary teams in the management of the PD patient. These initiatives have the potential for both cost savings and improved outcomes from a preventative and a hospital management standpoint.

Predictors of cognitive outcomes in early Parkinson disease patients: The National Institutes of Health Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease (NET-PD) experience.

Cognitive dysfunction is an important aspect of Parkinson disease (PD) and is increasingly being examined in various large scale PD clinical studies. However, the sensitivity of some of the cognitive measures used for detecting change in cognitive status in early PD patients is not known nor is the relationship between cognitive outcome measures and other motor and non-motor disease characteristics and various demographic parameters in early PD patients. The current analysis of the NET-PD cohort (i.e., untreated patients) was undertaken to: 1) assess which (if any) baseline demographic parameters correlate with baseline cognitive measures and any potential change in cognitive measures over the 12-18 months evaluation period; 2) assess the extent to which cognitive measures employed (i.e., Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and Letter-Number Sequencing) are sensitive to change over time; 3) examine whether initiation of symptomatic therapy is associated with change in cognitive status. At baseline, NET-PD subjects had no significant impairment on the assessments employed. Only education and age were significant predictors of cognitive score at baseline. None of the summary measures were indicative of change in cognitive status over the 12-18 months of study. These results suggest either the cognitive domains examined are not affected in the population examined or that more sensitive measures of cognition than those currently employed may need to be considered for use in a large trial setting in which an early, highly educated PD population is studied.

Orally disintegrating selegiline in Parkinson patients with dopamine agonist-related adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding orally disintegrating selegiline (ODS) while decreasing dopamine agonist (DA) dosages would reduce DA-related adverse effects (AEs) of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), pedal edema, hallucinations, and impulse control disorders (ICDs) without compromising efficacy in Parkinson disease (PD) patients. METHODS: This was a 12-week open-label study of 60 PD patients with motor fluctuations and DA-related AEs of EDS, pedal edema, hallucinations, and ICDs. Orally disintegrating selegiline was initiated at 1.25 mg once daily, and down titration of the DA was started with a goal of a 50% reduction by 1 week. At week 6, ODS was increased to 2.5 mg, and further reductions of the DA were allowed if the AEs were not resolved. RESULTS: The addition of ODS allowed a reduction in the mean daily dose of pramipexole from 2.3 to 0.5 mg and immediate-release ropinirole from 11.2 to 2.9 mg. Most subjects reported a reduction or resolution of DA-related AEs; 94% with EDS (n = 50), 73% with pedal edema (n = 26), 86% with hallucinations (n = 15), and 84% with ICDs (n = 25). Mean activities of daily living and motor scores from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale as well as quality-of-life scores were significantly improved without an increase in daily "off" time. The most common AEs, most of which resolved after titration, were worsening of PD, nausea/vomiting, dyskinesia, increased off time, body aches, insomnia, orthostatic hypotension, and increased anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: In most subjects, the addition of ODS with decreasing dosages of DAs substantially reduced EDS, pedal edema, hallucinations, and ICDs without compromising efficacy.

Sexual and relationship satisfaction among persons with young-onset Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) presents unique personal and social challenges, particularly for those with onset before the age of 50 years. AIM: The aim of this article is to evaluate sexual and non-sexual aspects of relationship satisfaction among persons with young-onset PD and their partners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were Index of Sexual Satisfaction (ISS) and Golombok-Rust Inventory of Marital State (GRIMS). METHODS: Persons with PD (PWP) and partners who attended the 2005 National Parkinson Foundation Young Onset Network Conference were asked to complete a survey. Each survey included demographics, a clinical history questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), ISS, and GRIMS. RESULTS: Sixty PWP (63% men, 85% in a relationship) responded to the survey. Median age was 50 years (range 29-62), with a median age at symptom onset of 43 years (range 17-55). ISS scores indicated clinically significant sexual dissatisfaction in 37%. Relationship dissatisfaction measured by the GRIMS was scored as "poor" or worse in 57%. Depressive symptomatology was severe in 19% and mild in 33%. Sexual dissatisfaction (ISS) correlated with relationship dissatisfaction (GRIMS) (correlation coefficient [CC] = 0.58, P < 0.001). Relationship dissatisfaction (GRIMS) correlated with depressive symptomatology (BDI) (CC = 0.38, P = 0.007). No correlations were found with any demographic or disease characteristics. Thirty-two couples (both the PWP and their partner) completed the surveys. Sexual and relationship dissatisfaction among PWP paralleled that of their partner (ISS: CC = 0.48, P = 0.005; GRIMS: CC = 0.61, P < 0.001). Depressive symptomatology of the PWP correlated with their partners' relationship dissatisfaction (CC = 0.46, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, sexual and relationship dissatisfaction were prevalent among young-onset PD patients. PD patients were similar to their partners in their level of sexual and relationship dissatisfaction. The degree of dissatisfaction did not correlate with demographics or self-reported disease characteristics. Self-reported depressive symptomatology among PD patients was adversely associated with both their and their partner's relationship satisfaction. Wiel

Assessing cognition in Parkinson disease: use of the cognitive linguistic quick test.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT) as a cognitive screening tool in Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: A total of 93 patients with PD were evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the CLQT. The CLQT provides separate ratings for 5 cognitive domains. Descriptive statistics, correlations between the tests, and diagnostic value for dementia were analyzed. RESULTS: Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test correlated well with MMSE. Diagnostic values for dementia were similar for the 2 instruments. Unlike the MMSE, the CLQT also provided domain-specific information on cognitive deficits. Cognitive domains were differentially affected between and within the demented and nondemented patient groups with PD: memory was the weakest domain in the demented group and attention in the nondemented. CONCLUSIONS: The CLQT is a valuable instrument in assessing cognitive dysfunction in PD. The CLQT is superior to the MMSE as it also provides cognitive domain-specific information.