Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans.

PURPOSE: To study the impact of systematic MLC leaf positional uncertainties (stemming from mechanical inaccuracies or sub-optimal MLC modeling) on the quality of intracranial single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans. An estimation of appropriate tolerance levels is attempted. METHODS: Five patients, with three to four metastases and at least one target lying in close proximity to organs-at-risk (OARs) were included in this study. A single-isocenter multi-arc VMAT plan per patient was prepared, which served as the reference for dosimetric impact evaluation. A range of leaf offsets was introduced (±0.03 mm up to ±0.30 mm defined at the MLC plane) to both leaf banks, by varying the leaf offset MLC modeling parameter in Monaco for all the prepared plans, in order to simulate projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm up to ±0.94 mm at the isocenter plane, respectively. For all offsets simulated and cases studied, dose distributions were re-calculated and compared with the corresponding reference ones. An experimental dosimetric procedure using the SRS mapCHECK diode array was also performed to support the simulation study results and investigate its suitability to detect small systematic leaf positional errors. RESULTS: Projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm were well-tolerated with respect to both target dosimetry and OAR-sparing. A linear relationship was found between D95% percentage change and projected leaf offset (slope: 12%/mm). Impact of projected offset on target dosimetry was strongly associated with target volume. In two cases, plans that could be considered potentially clinically unacceptable (i.e., clinical dose constraint violation) were obtained even for projected offsets as small as 0.19 mm. The performed experimental dosimetry check can detect potential small systematic leaf errors. CONCLUSIONS: Plan quality indices and dose-volume metrics are very sensitive to systematic sub-millimeter leaf positional inaccuracies, projected at the isocenter plane. Acceptable and tolerance levels in systematic MLC uncertainties need to be tailored to VMAT-SRS spatial and dosimetric accuracy requirements.

Evaluation of patient-specific MR distortion correction schemes for improved target localization accuracy in SRS.

PURPOSE: This work aims at promoting target localization accuracy in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications by focusing on the correction of sequence-dependent (also patient induced) magnetic resonance (MR) distortions at the lesion locations. A phantom-based quality assurance (QA) methodology was developed and implemented for the evaluation of three distortion correction techniques. The same approach was also adapted to cranial MR images used for SRS treatment planning purposes in single or multiple brain metastases cases. METHODS: A three-dimensional (3D)-printed head phantom was filled with a 3D polymer gel dosimeter. Following treatment planning and dose delivery, volumes of radiation-induced polymerization served as hypothetical lesions, offering adequate MR contrast with respect to the surrounding unirradiated areas. T1-weighted (T1w) MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T using the clinical scanning protocol for SRS. Additional images were acquired to implement three distortion correction methods; the field mapping (FM), mean image (MI) and signal integration (SI) techniques. Reference lesion locations were calculated as the averaged centroid positions of each target identified in the forward and reverse read gradient polarity MRI scans. The same techniques and workflows were implemented for the correction of contrast-enhanced T1w MR images of 10 patients with a total of 27 brain metastases. RESULTS: All methods employed in the phantom study diminished spatial distortion. Median and maximum distortion magnitude decreased from 0.7 mm (2.10 ppm) and 0.8 mm (2.36 ppm), respectively, to <0.2 mm (0.61 ppm) at all target locations, using any of the three techniques. Image quality of the corrected images was acceptable, while contrast-to-noise ratio slightly increased. Results of the patient study were in accordance with the findings of the phantom study. Residual distortion in corrected patient images was found to be <0.3 mm in the vast majority of targets. Overall, the MI approach appears to be the most efficient correction method from the three investigated. CONCLUSIONS: In cranial SRS applications, patient-specific distortion correction at the target location(s) is feasible and effective, despite the expense of longer imaging time since additional MRI scan(s) need to be performed. A phantom-based QA methodology was developed and presented to reassure efficient implementation of correction techniques for sequence-dependent spatial distortion.

Lead exposure in clinical imaging - The elephant in the room.

PURPOSE: Radiation Protection Apparel (RPA) is used during diagnostic imaging and interventional procedures to minimise incidental radiation exposure. The majority of RPA in use are lead-containing, which has until now been considered safe. A recent single-centre study has demonstrated that the external surface of 63 % of RPA was contaminated with lead dust. The purpose of this study was to reproduce this investigation with a larger sample size across Europe and assess whether decontamination procedures were possible. METHOD: The routine RPA Quality Control (QC) process was adapted to include lead dust contamination tests and decontamination if present. The presence of lead dust was determined using a commercially available colorimetric method. RPA that failed initial QC or could not be decontaminated were removed from use. RESULTS: From June to October 2019, 728 RPA from 85 imaging centres from five countries underwent initial QC. Of these, 712 were tested for lead dust contamination which was present on 162 (23 %). Following cleaning, 85 (12 %) remained contaminated and were removed from use. Linear regression analysis shows a significant correlation between type of RPA and contamination, (p = 0.0015). There was no correlation between contamination and imaging department, year of manufacture, country and RPA condition (p-values 0.98, 0.90, 0.94 and 0.14 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lead dust contamination is present on 23 % of RPA that would pass routine QC procedures. Approximately half were not amenable to decontamination and were removed from use. Procedures were introduced for the routine handling of RPA, and updated QC steps for assessment and cleaning. Lead-free RPA should be considered.

Dosimetric comparison of five different techniques for craniospinal irradiation across 15 European centers: analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-BTG (radiotherapy working group).

PURPOSE: Conventional techniques (3D-CRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) are still widely used. Modern techniques (IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy®, proton pencil beam scanning [PBS]) are applied in a limited number of centers. For a 14-year-old patient, we aimed to compare dose distributions of five CSI techniques applied across Europe and generated according to the participating institute protocols, therefore representing daily practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter (n = 15) dosimetric analysis of five different techniques for CSI (3D-CRT, IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy®, PBS; 3 centers per technique) was performed using the same patient data, set of delineations and dose prescription (36.0/1.8 Gy). Different treatment plans were optimized based on the same planning target volume margin. All participating institutes returned their best treatment plan applicable in clinic. RESULTS: The modern radiotherapy techniques investigated resulted in superior conformity/homogeneity-indices (CI/HI), particularly in the spinal part of the target (CI: 3D-CRT:0.3 vs. modern:0.6; HI: 3D-CRT:0.2 vs. modern:0.1), and demonstrated a decreased dose to the thyroid, heart, esophagus and pancreas. Dose reductions of >10.0 Gy were observed with PBS compared to modern photon techniques for parotid glands, thyroid and pancreas. Following this technique, a wide range in dosimetry among centers using the same technique was observed (e.g., thyroid mean dose: VMAT: 5.6-24.6 Gy; PBS: 0.3-10.1 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: The investigated modern radiotherapy techniques demonstrate superior dosimetric results compared to 3D-CRT. The lowest mean dose for organs at risk is obtained with proton therapy. However, for a large number of organs ranges in mean doses were wide and overlapping between techniques making it difficult to recommend one radiotherapy technique over another.

Malignant transformation in vestibular schwannoma: report of a single case, literature search, and debate.

OBJECT: The significance of radiation in the induction of malignancy in vestibular schwannomas (VSs) after radiosurgery is unclear despite an increasing number of case reports. The authors describe a new case of verified malignant transformation in a vestibular schwannoma (MTVS) and provide a new evaluation of such cases previously reported in the literature. METHODS: A 46-year-old woman underwent subtotal resection of a right-sided VS in 2004. The histological characteristics of the lesion were typical and benign. In early 2007 Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) was performed to treat a residual enlarging remnant. The radiosurgery parameters included the following: target volume 3.5 cm(3), prescription dose 12 Gy, prescription isodose 45%, maximum dose 26.7 Gy, and coverage 97%. At 2 years' follow-up the lesion was enlarged to 5.2 cm(3), but by 5 years it had decreased to 2.3 cm(3). Six months later the lesion was 8.4 cm(3). Repeated surgery was performed, and a histological analysis revealed a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. The case was further managed with repeated GKS performed in the spring of 2013. At that time, the radiosurgery parameters included the following: target volume 3.5 cm(3), prescription dose 16 Gy, prescription isodose 45%, maximum dose 35.6 Gy, and coverage 91%. This Gamma Knife Department has treated a total of 205 patients with VS (local incidence of MTVS 0.49%). A search of the literature published up to and including 2013 was performed using PubMed as well as more informal search methods. RESULTS: This patient is the 29th reported case of MTVS after radiation therapy. Of these cases, 40.7% were patients with neurofibromatosis (NF). In those cases in which histology showed tumors with previously benign characteristics, totally conforming to the criteria for MTVS, the mean delay to malignant expression was 68 months (median delay 72 months). The authors also retrieved papers reporting 30 cases of malignant VS in patients who had not undergone radiation treatment. Five of those cases were malignant transformation of a benign entity, and in 4 of them histology had verified that the initial disease was benign. In those 4 cases, there was a mean delay to malignant expression of 7.2 months (median delay 8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Despite more frequent reports of MTVS after radiation treatment recently, there has been no accurate quantification of the risk, except in patients with NF, in whom the incidence of malignancy is high in relation to the numbers treated. The present analysis indicates that the risk of malignancy over 20 years in cases in which no radiation treatment has occurred is 1.32-2.08 per 100,000, and this risk decreases to 1.09-1.74 per 100,000 if cases of NF are excluded. After radiation treatment, the overall risk over 20 years is 25.1 per 100,000, and this risk decreases to 15.6 per 100,000 if cases of NF are excluded. Radiation treatment increases the risk by approximately 10 times in non-NF cases.