Single-exon fetal RHD genotyping: a 31-month follow up in the obstetric population of Western Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The Rh blood group system is highly complex, polymorphic, and immunogenic. The presence of RHD gene variants in RhD negative pregnant women is a challenge in fetal RHD genotyping as it may influence the antenatal management of anti-D prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of a non-invasive single-exon approach in the obstetric population of Western Sweden in a 31-month follow up. The frequency and type of maternal RHD variants were explored and the relation to the ethnicity was elucidated. Discrepant results between fetal RHD genotyping and serological blood group typing of newborns were investigated and clarified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RHD exon 4 was analysed with quantitative real-time PCR technique in a total of 6,948 blood samples from RhD negative women in early pregnancy. All cases with suspected maternal RHD gene and discrepant results observed in newborn samples, were further investigated using both serological and molecular technologies. RESULTS: A total of 43 samples (0.6%) had inconclusive fetal genotyping result due the presence of a maternal RHD gene. These findings were in most cases (>66%) observed in pregnant women of non-European ancestry. Additionally, two novel RHD alleles were found. Seven discrepant results between fetal RHD genotype and serological RhD type of the newborns, were shown to be related to D antigen variants in newborns. Assay sensitivity was 99.95%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 99.97%. DISCUSSION: The single-exon approach for fetal RHD screening early in pregnancy is an appropriate choice in the population of Western Sweden, with a very low frequency of inconclusive results caused by the presence of maternal RHD gene variants. Due to the high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the test, serological typing of neonates born to RhD negative women has no longer been performed at our laboratory since June 2023.

Evaluation of an automated platform for non-invasive single-exon fetal RHD genotyping early in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: RhD immunization is still the major cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Fetal RHD genotyping during pregnancy followed by tailored anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant RhD-negative women carrying an RHD-positive fetus to prevent RhD immunization is a well-established practice in many countries. This study aimed to validate a platform for high-throughput, non-invasive, single-exon, fetal RHD genotyping consisting of automated DNA extraction and PCR set-up, and a novel system for electronic data transfer to the real-time PCR instrument. We also investigated the effect of storage conditions of fresh or frozen samples on the outcome of the assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples from 261 RhD-negative pregnant women collected in Gothenburg, Sweden, between November 2018 and April 2020 during gestation week 10-14 were either tested as fresh after storage for 0-7 days at room temperature or as thawed plasma samples previously separated and stored for up to 13 months at -80°C. Extraction of cell-free fetal DNA and PCR set-up were performed in a closed automated system. Fetal RHD genotyping was determined by real-time PCR amplification of the RHD gene exon 4. RESULTS: The outcome of RHD genotyping was compared with either the results obtained with serological RhD typing of newborns or with the results of RHD genotyping performed by other laboratories. No difference was observed in genotyping results when using fresh or frozen plasma during short- and long-term storage, revealing high stability of cell-free fetal DNA. The assay has shown high sensitivity (99.37%), specificity (100%), and accuracy (99.62%). DISCUSSION: These data confirm that the proposed platform for non-invasive, single-exon, RHD genotyping early in pregnancy is accurate and robust. Importantly, we demonstrated the stability of cell-free fetal DNA in fresh and frozen samples after short- and long-term storage.

Evaluation of a screening program for iron overload and HFE mutations in 50,493 blood donors.

Early detection of individuals with hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is important to manage iron levels and prevent future organ damage. Although the HFE mutations that cause most cases of HH have been identified, their geographic distribution is highly variable, and their contribution to iron overload is not fully understood. All new registered blood donors at the Sahlgrenska University hospital between 1998 and 2015 were included in the study. Donors with signs of iron overload at baseline and subsequent follow-up testing were recommended genotyping of the HFE gene. Of the 50,493 donors that were included in the study, 950 (1.9%) had signs of iron overload on both test occasions. Of the 840 donors with iron overload that performed HFE genotyping, 117 were homozygous for C282Y, and 97 were compound heterozygotes. The prevalence of C282Y homozygosity was 0.23%. Iron overload screening effectively detects individuals at risk of carrying the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene and enables early treatment to prevent HH complications.

Identification of new KLF1 and LU alleles during the resolution of Lutheran typing discrepancies.

BACKGROUND: The Lu(b) antigen is expressed on red blood cells (RBCs) of the majority of individuals in all populations. Its absence in transfused patients may lead to alloantibody production and mild-to-moderate transfusion reactions, and in pregnancies to mild hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This report describes the results of discrepancy resolution between apparent LU*A/LU*B or LU*B/LU*B genotypes and apparent Lu(b-) or Lu(b+ weak) phenotypes in one Asian and 10 Caucasian blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood samples were analyzed by molecular methods to resolve discrepancies between Lu(b-) phenotypes detected by serology and Lu(b+) phenotypes predicted by genotyping. RBC agglutination assays were performed with commercial and patient antisera by tube or gel column methods. Genotyping was performed on commercial arrays that target the LU*A/LU*B polymorphism at Position c.230. The discrepancies were resolved by sequencing of genomic DNA and in some cases by sequencing of cloned DNA fragments. RESULTS: Eleven new alleles with coding sequence variants were identified, seven in the KLF1 gene, which are presumed to act dominantly to silence LU expression, and four in the LU gene itself. The alleles are KLF1*114delC, KLF1*298T, KLF1*304C,484insC, KLF1*304C,1000del2, KLF1*621G, KLF1*948delC, KLF1*1040A,1045delT, LU*B(559T,711T,714T), LU*B(611A,638T), LU*B(1049del2ins3), and LU*B(1306T,1340T,1671T,1742T). CONCLUSION: Besides confirming common phenotypes and detecting rare antigen-negative phenotypes, the use of molecular methods in blood donor typing can prompt the identification of new alleles through discrepancy resolution.

Detection of anti-IgA antibodies using the particle gel immunoassay: a rapid test for increased patient safety.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a major issue in transfusion medicine and commands continuous efforts to develop valid control methods aiming to avoid serious transfusion-related complications. Anti-IgA antibodies can cause anaphylactic transfusion reactions in IgA-deficient individuals. Since standard quantitative methods for anti-IgA measurement require considerable time to be performed, in an emergency situation it can be a challenge to prevent or to quickly interpret and manage acute transfusion reactions suspected to be a consequence of anti-IgA. The purpose of this study was to test and validate at our transfusion centre a rapid assay for the identification of patients with anti-IgA antibodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six samples (6 from healthy controls and 40 from IgA-deficient patients) were collected. Sera were analysed blindly by three different clinical laboratory technologists using two DiaMed particle gel immunoassays (ID-PaGIA) for IgA deficiency and for antibodies to IgA. The results were subsequently checked with the results of a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay conducted in the reference immunology laboratory. RESULTS: The ID-PaGIA had a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 97.1% for the IgA deficiency test. With regards to the detection of anti-IgA antibodies, the sensitivity was 89.3% and the specificity 100%. The reproducibility of the test was 100%. DISCUSSION: The ID-PaGIA screening assays are suitable for the investigation of transfusion-related anaphylactic reactions in a routine blood bank laboratory. Although the gel card technique does not quantify the level of anti-IgA antibodies, it is readily available, providing an effective and simple method for the diagnosis of anti-IgA related anaphylaxis and guidance for the appropriate transfusion practice in an emergency.