[Perinatal result of an institutional assisted reproduction program]. / Resultado perinatal de un programa de reproducción asistida institucional.

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproductive technology manipulates masculine gametes, embryos and implantation. It also aids the known or unknown factor of sterility without having the base problem correction as a target. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer are among these techniques. OBJECTIVE: To describe the overall outcome and the final perinatal offspring after in vitro fertilization cycle in an institutional third level hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IVF cycles were retrospectively analyzed from October 1999 to May 2004. Several variables were described like: age, fertilization rate, implantation and pregnancy rate, fetal status, time of gestation during labor, miscarriage follicle-stimulating hormone rate and take-home baby rate. Patients underwent hypophyseal supression with GnRH analog, using a long luteal phase protocol and stimulated with recombinant FSH. Overall data is expressed as average +/- standard deviation and percentage. RESULTS: 365 cycles were analyzed in 314 patients, average age was of 34 +/- 3.7 years, tubal factor was diagnosed in 63.3%, fertilization rate was of 60.4%, implantation rate of 37.1%, per transfer pregnancy rate of 25.1%, per transfer live born rate of 21.7%, multiple pregnancy rate of 29.3%, miscarriage rate of 28% and ectopic pregnancy rate of 4.8%. In 87.8% of the cases caesarean operation was made; multiple pregnancy offspring weighted more than 1250 g in 70% of them; 70.5% was born after 32 weeks of pregnancy; 90% was born live and with good prognosis. Glucose metabolism alterations were the most frequent maternal complication. CONCLUSION: Although the results obtained were similar to those of assisted reproduction centers, it suggests improving multiple pregnancy rate and abortion rate.

[Estrogen role in the luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer cycles]. / Papel de los estrógenos en el soporte de la fase lútea en ciclos de fertilización in vitro con transferencia de embriones.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of estradiol administration for luteal phase support and to describe the progesterone and estradiol behavior in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer luteal phase. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and using gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist. They were divided at random into two groups: group 1 would receive progesterone alone, and group 2 would take estrogen and progesterone. Serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone were measured on days 7 and 14 post-embryo transfer. RESULTS: We examined 52 patients; 24 received progesterone alone and 28 took estrogen and progesterone. Significantly higher estradiol and progesterone concentrations on day 14 were found in pregnant women. It was not on day 7. A significant increment of estrogen was found in the estrogen and progesterone group. Progesterone did not increase significantly. Pregnancy rate was the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, the addition of estradiol to the progesterone support regimen does not have beneficial effects in terms of pregnancy rate. On day 7 neither progesterone nor estradiol are good predictors of pregnancy.