"Long-term oncologic outcomes and risk factors for distant recurrence after pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. A nationwide, multicentre study".

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after multimodal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is used as surrogate marker of success as it is assumed to correlate with improved oncologic outcome. However, long-term oncologic data are scarce. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre study updated the oncologic follow-up of prospectively collected data from the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project database. pCR was described as no evidence of tumour cells in the specimen. Endpoints were distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate regression analyses were run to identify factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Overall, 32 different hospitals were involved, providing data on 815 patients with pCR. At a median follow-up of 73.4 (IQR 57.7-99.5) months, distant metastases occurred in 6.4% of patients. Abdominoperineal excision (APE) (HR 2.2, 95%CI 1.2-4.1, p = 0.008) and elevated CEA levels (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.7, p = 0.049) were independent risk factors for distant recurrence. Age (years) (HR 1.1; 95%-CI 1.05-41.09; p < 0.001) and ASA III-IV (HR = 2.0; 95%-CI 1.4-2.9; p < 0.001), were the only factors associated with OS. The estimated 12, 36 and 60-months DMFS rates were 96.9%, 91.3%, and 86.8%. The estimated 12, 36 and 60-months OS rates were 99.1%, 94.9% and 89.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of metachronous distant metastases is low after pCR, with high rates of both DMFS and OS. The oncologic prognosis in LARC patients that achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is excellent in the long term.

Estimulación preoperatoria del asa eferente de la ileostomía con ácidos grasos de cadena corta / Stimulation the efferent limb before loop ileostomy closure with short chain fatty acids

No disponible

Resección de GIST rectal mediante cirugía transanal mínimamente invasiva (TAMIS) tras neoadyuvancia con imatinib / Resection of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour by transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) after neoadjuvant treatment with Imatinib

Resumen El tratamiento primario de elección para los pacientes con una tumoración GIST localizada es la extirpación quirúrgica completa con márgenes microscópicos negativos. Sin embargo, en un espacio tan reducido como el de la pelvis, la resección completa de una tumo-ración rectal grande es difícil y necesita en ocasiones una amputación abdomino-perienal. En nuestro caso, con la finalidad de reducir el tamaño del tumor y la morbilidad asociada a procedimientos quirúrgicos más agresivos se introdujo el tratamiento con imatinib, con intención neoadyuvante monitorizando la respuesta mediante ecoendoscopia. La respuesta obtenida, rediciendo el volumen tumoral, modificó la estrategia quirúrgica inicial y fue posible conseguir una resección satisfactoria mediante cirugía transanal mínimamente invasiva (TAMIS), preservando los esfínteres anales y soslayando la morbilidad genitourinaria asociada a la excisión mesorectal.

Abstract The primary treatment of choice for patients with a localised gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is complete surgical excision with negative microscopic margins. However, in a space as small as that of the pelvis, complete resection of a large rectal tumour is difficult, and sometimes requires an abdominoperineal amputation. In order to reduce the size of the tumour, as well as the morbidity associated with more aggressive surgical procedures, neoadjuvant treatment with Imatinib was introduced in this case, with the response being monitored by of endoscopic ultrasound. The response obtained by reducing the tumour volume modified the strategy, making it possible to obtain a satisfactory resection using transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS), preserving the anal sphincters and avoiding the genitourinary morbidity associated with the mesorectal excision.

Cáncer de recto localmente avanzado. La necesidad de la superespecialización / Locally advanced rectal cancer. The need for further specialization

Presentamos un caso que por sus connotaciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas resulta especialmente didáctico e ilustrativo, pues aborda el cómo, el quién y dónde debe realizarse la cirugía de cáncer de recto localmente avanzado. Ilustra el manejo diagnóstico y la estadificación del cáncer de recto en el momento actual. Este caso se aborda en el comité de forma multidisciplinar, y reúne los distintos avances en la cirugía de cáncer de recto de los últimos años (escisión total mesorrectal, abordaje laparoscópico, radioterapia intraoperatoria, resección perineal extendida, reparación del suelo pélvico con material protésico). Todo ello aunado a la opinión de que deben ser instituciones y grupos muy especializados y dedicados al tratamiento de esta patología los que deberían centralizar su atención médica.

We present a case, which due to its diagnostic and therapeutic connotations makes it especially educational, as it addresses the how, the who and where should the surgery be performed for locally advanced rectal cancer. It illustrates the diagnostic management and staging of rectal cancer at the present time. The case is approached in a multidisciplinary committee manner, and binds the various advances in surgery of rectal cancer in recent years (total meso-rectal excision, laparoscopy, intraoperative radiotherapy, extended perineal resection, pelvic floor repair with prosthetic material). This serves to underline the view that there must be highly specialized institutions and groups dedicated to the treatment of this condition in order to centralize its health care.

Cáncer colorrectal en pacientes mayores de 90 años: ¿cuál es el mejor tratamiento? / Colorectal cancer in a nonagenarian. What is the best treatment?

No disponible

Genetic variations in SMAD7 are associated with colorectal cancer risk in the colon cancer family registry.

BACKGROUND: Recent genome-wide studies identified a risk locus for colorectal cancer at 18q21, which maps to the SMAD7 gene. Our objective was to confirm the association between SMAD7 SNPs and colorectal cancer risk in the multi-center Colon Cancer Family Registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 tagging SNPs in the SMAD7 gene were genotyped among 1,592 population-based and 253 clinic-based families. The SNP-colorectal cancer associations were assessed in multivariable conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the population-based families, both SNPs rs12953717 (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.49), and rs11874392 (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.92) were associated with risk of colorectal cancer. These associations were similar among the population- and the clinic-based families, though they were significant only among the former. Marginally significant differences in the SNP-colorectal cancer associations were observed by use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cigarette smoking, body mass index, and history of polyps. CONCLUSIONS: SMAD7 SNPs were associated with colorectal cancer risk in the Colon Cancer Family Registry. There was evidence suggesting that the association between rs12953717 and colorectal cancer risk may be modified by factors such as smoking and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Metástasis colónica de carcinoma lobulillar de mama / Colon metastasis of lobular breast cancer

No disponible

No disponible

Adrenalectomía laparoscópica: presentación de 43 casos / Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Presentation of 43 cases

Introducción El propósito del estudio es exponer y analizar nuestra experiencia en adrenalectomía laparoscópica (AL).Material y métodos Estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo sobre AL realizada en nuestro centro desde enero de 2000 hasta diciembre de 2008.ResultadosSe realizaron un total de 43 AL a 41 pacientes mediante abordaje transperitoneal lateral. La mediana de edad de los pacientes intervenidos se situó en 53 años. La principal indicación en frecuencia de nuestra serie fue el hiperaldosteronismo (19), seguido de incidentalomas (8), feocromocitomas (6), síndrome de Cushing (6), lesiones metastásicas (3) y carcinoma suprarrenal primario (1). La media de estancia hospitalaria poscirugía fue de 3 días y la media del tamaño de las masas fue de 30mm (rango: 4–155mm). No hubo mortalidad en nuestra serie. La necesidad de conversión se redujo a un caso; en ningún caso fue necesario reintervenir a un paciente. ConclusionesLa AL es una técnica segura y eficaz en el tratamiento de tumores suprarrenales que puede realizarse con riesgo y morbilidad mínima (AU)

Introduction The aim of the study was to present and analyse our experience in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).Materials and methods Descriptive and retrospective study including LA performed over 8 years, between 2000 and 2008 in our hospital. Results A total of 43 LA were performed to 41 patients using a transperitoneal lateral approach. Indications for adrenalectomy included hyperaldosteronism (19), non-functioning adenoma (8), phaeochromocytoma (6), Cushing's syndrome (6), metastasis (3) and adrenal primary tumour (1). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days and the median size of the masses was 30mm (range: 4–155mm) Complications occurred in 3 patients (2 respiratory infections, and 1 intraoperative bleeding). There was no mortality. Only one case needed conversion to open adrenalectomy; no patients required reintervention. Conclusion Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective method in the treatment of adrenal masses and it can be performed with minimal risk and morbidity (AU)

[Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: presentation of 43 cases]. / Adrenalectomía laparoscópica: presentación de 43 casos.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to present and analyse our experience in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive and retrospective study including LA performed over 8 years, between 2000 and 2008 in our hospital. RESULTS: A total of 43 LA were performed to 41 patients using a transperitoneal lateral approach. Indications for adrenalectomy included hyperaldosteronism (19), non-functioning adenoma (8), phaeochromocytoma (6), Cushing's syndrome (6), metastasis (3) and adrenal primary tumour (1). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days and the median size of the masses was 30mm (range: 4-155mm) Complications occurred in 3 patients (2 respiratory infections, and 1 intraoperative bleeding). There was no mortality. Only one case needed conversion to open adrenalectomy; no patients required reintervention. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective method in the treatment of adrenal masses and it can be performed with minimal risk and morbidity.

Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? Conclusions of a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now accepted as being safe for acute cholecystitis. However, it has not become routine, because the exact timing and approach to the surgical management remains ill defined. This study evaluated the effect of timing of LC in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODOLOGY: Group 1, those patients who had LC for AC within 72 hours was compared with group 2, those who had LC for AC after 72 hours. Univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to determine if any factors had a significant association with the complications, postoperative hospital stay, and conversion index. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Comparing the two groups, the conversion rate to an open procedure was significantly less (7.8% versus 18.4%, P_0.02) in the early treated patients. Furthermore, postoperative hospitalization (6.5 versus 9.5 days, P 0.01), and complications (8.8% versus 17.7%, P _0.02) were significantly reduced in patients undergoing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage to delaying cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis on the basis of outcomes in complications, rate of conversion to open surgery, and mean hospital stay. Thus, early cholecystectomy should be be the preferred surgical approach for patients with acute lithiasic cholecystitis.