Effect of Foley catheters on seed positions and urethral dose in (125)I and (103)Pd prostate implants.

PURPOSE: To estimate the perturbation of seed position and urethral dose, subsequent to withdrawal of urethral catheters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A mathematical model based on the volume incompressibility of tissues was used to compute seed positions and doses following removal of the Foley. The model assumed that the central axis of the urethra remains stationary, and that prostate tissue and seeds move radially toward the center of the urethra to fill the void left by the catheter. Seed motion has also been measured using transrectal ultrasound. RESULTS: Based on the computations, seeds located originally close to the urethra travel relatively large distances toward the urethra upon Foley removal, whereas seeds located further away move substantially less. This seed motion leads to higher urethral doses than shown in a standard treatment plan. Dose enhancements increase with catheter size, decrease with increasing prostate volume, are more pronounced for (103)Pd than for (125)I, and range between 3.5% and 32.4%. Postimplant dosimetry is equally affected if images are taken with urethral catheters in place, showing lower urethral doses than actually delivered. Preliminary ultrasound based measurements of seed motion agree with the theory. CONCLUSION: During the implantation procedure, 12 fr or smaller urethral catheters are preferable to larger diameter catheters if urine drainage is sufficient. Treatment planners should avoid planning seeds at 5 mm or closer from the urethra. Special caution is indicated in prostates having about 20 cm(3) or smaller volumes, and when (103)Pd is used. Postimplant dosimetry is susceptible to the same errors.

Real-time monitoring and verification of in vivo high dose rate brachytherapy using a pinhole camera.

We investigated a pinhole imaging system for independent in vivo monitoring and verification of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment. The system consists of a high-resolution pinhole collimator, an x-ray fluoroscope, and a standard radiographic screen-film combination. Autofluoroscopy provides real-time images of the in vivo Ir-192 HDR source for monitoring the source location and movement, whereas autoradiography generates a permanent record of source positions on film. Dual-pinhole autoradiographs render stereo-shifted source images that can be used to reconstruct the source dwell positions in three dimensions. The dynamic range and spatial resolution of the system were studied with a polystyrene phantom using a range of source strengths and dwell times. For the range of source activity used in HDR brachytherapy, a 0.5 mm diameter pinhole produced sharp fluoroscopic images of the source within the dynamic range of the fluoroscope. With a source-to-film distance of 35 cm and a 400 speed screen-film combination, the same pinhole yielded well recognizable images of a 281.2 GBq (7.60 Ci) Ir-192 source for dwell times in the typical clinical range of 2 to 400 s. This 0.5 mm diameter pinhole could clearly resolve source positions separated by lateral displacements as small as 1 mm. Using a simple reconstruction algorithm, dwell positions in a phantom were derived from stereo-shifted dual-pinhole images and compared to the known positions. The agreement was better than 1 mm. A preliminary study of a patient undergoing HDR treatment for cervical cancer suggests that the imaging method is clinically feasible. Based on these studies we believe that the pinhole imaging method is capable of providing independent and reliable real-time monitoring and verification for HDR brachytherapy.

In vivo urethral dose measurements: a method to verify high dose rate prostate treatments.

Radiation doses delivered in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy are susceptible to many inaccuracies and errors, including imaging, planning and delivery. Consequently, the dose delivered to the patient may deviate substantially from the treatment plan. We investigated the feasibility of using TLD measurements in the urethra to estimate the discrepancy in treatments for prostate cancer. The dose response of the 1 mm diam, 6 mm long LiF rods that we used for the in vivo measurements was calibrated with the 192Ir HDR source, as well as a 60Co teletherapy unit. A train of 20 rods contained in a sterile plastic tube was inserted into the urethral (Foley) catheter for the duration of a treatment fraction, and the measured doses were compared to the treatment plan. Initial results from a total of seven treatments in four patients show good agreement between theory and experiment. Analysis of any one treatment showed agreement within 11.7% +/- 6.2% for the highest dose encountered in the central prostatic urethra, and within 10.4% +/- 4.4% for the mean dose. Taking the average over all seven treatments shows agreement within 1.7% for the maximum urethral dose, and within 1.5% for the mean urethral dose. Based on these initial findings it seems that planned prostate doses can be accurately reproduced in the clinic.

Quality assurance system to correct for errors arising from couch rotation in linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was the development of a quality assurance (QA) system that would provide geographically accurate targeting for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (LBSR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The key component of our QA system is a novel device (Alignment Tool) for expedient measurement of gantry and treatment table excursions (wobble) during rotation. The Alignment Tool replaces the familiar pencil-shaped pointers with a ball pointer that is used with the field light of the accelerator to indicate alignment of beam and target. Wobble is measured prior to each patient treatment and analyzed together with the BRW coordinates of the target by a spreadsheet. The corrections required to compensate for any imprecisions are identified, and a printout generated indicating the floor stand coordinates for each couch angle used to place the target at isocenter. RESULTS: The Alignment Tool has an inherent accuracy of measurement better than 0.1 mm. The overall targeting error of our QA method, found by evaluating 177 target simulator films of 55 foci in 40 randomly selected patients, was 0.47 +/- 0.23 mm. The Alignment Tool was also valuable during installation of the floor stand and a supplemental collimator for the accelerator. CONCLUSIONS: The QA procedure described allows accurate targeting in LBSR, even when couch rotation is imprecise. The Alignment Tool can facilitate the installation of any stereotactic irradiation system, and can be useful for annual QA checks as well as in the installation and commissioning of new accelerators.

Dynamics of pear-shaped dimensions and volume of intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix: a desirable pear shape in the era of three-dimensional treatment planning.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dynamics of pear-shaped dimensions and volume of the intracavitary brachytherapy, and to define a desirable pear-shape in the era of three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since Point A has been used for the dose specification, the pear shape defined the surface enclosed by Point A. This study utilized a new method of evaluating pear-shaped dimensions and its configuration. The pear shape was artificially divided into tandem and colpostat portions for evaluation of its changes. Width, height, and thickness at the tandem portion (Wt, Ht, and Tt) and at the colpostat portion (Wc, Hc, and Tc) were defined, respectively, on the frontal and sagittal plane. To evaluate the dynamics of the pear-shape configuration, 12 variations of applicator geometry and source loading were applied to generate the pear-shape isodose line and dose-volume histogram. RESULTS: When the source strengths in the colpostats were reduced for optimization with the same dose to Point A dose, Wc, Hc, and Tc were decreased, whereas Wt, Ht, and Tt were increased without a change in the overall pear-shaped volume. When the separation of the colpostats was increased without a change in the source strength, Wc was increased, whereas Hc and Tc were reduced without a change in Wt, Ht, Tt and overall pear-shape volume. When the separation of colpostats and distal tandem source were increased, these changes at the colpostat portion were magnified. However, when both colpostat separation and its source strength were increased proportionally, Wc, Hc, and Tc were increased proportionally as well as its volume. CONCLUSION: The dose specification at Point A is less meaningful without a desirable pear shape encompassing the tumor around the cervix. In the era of 3D treatment planning, understanding the dynamics of the pear shape should improve the individualized dosimetry according to tumor size and location. The relationships between a desirable pear shape and its tumor coverage should establish a more reliable dose specification for cancer of the cervix.

A clinically practical electron cone for the treatment of head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the work was to develop a practical electron cone and to compare its dosimetry with that of the conventional applicator collimation system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The electron cone consists of the upper part of a manufacturer-supplied electron applicator and an institution-built rectangular extension tube which produces a 12 cm x 6 cm field at 100 cm SSD while maintaining an air gap of 5 cm between the patient. RESULTS: The compact size of the cone allows electron irradiation without having to reposition the patient after photon treatment. The radiation field is very similar to that of a standard 15 cm x 15 cm applicator with a 12 cm x 6 cm field restricting insert. Radiation leakage at the surface of the special cone is typically less than 1% of the useful beam at dmax. During 12 years of clinical use the special cone proved itself very practical in the treatment of more than 300 patients. CONCLUSION: An electron cone practical for clinical use with dosimetry comparable to the conventional applicator was developed.

Expedient set-up of tangential breast fields with a simple gantry attachment.

A novel technique for setting up tangential fields is described. The technique uses a simple device (Breast Aligner) which attaches to the collimator of the treatment unit. The function of the Breast Aligner is similar to conventional front and back pointers except that the beam edge rather than central ray is defined. By delineating beam entrance and exit points at the posterior field edge, the device greatly simplifies and expedites set-up, and enhances precision of port alignment. Additional advantageous features include: (a) the ability to compensate for small inadvertent variations from the initial set-up position or for patient movement between the set-up of opposing ports, (b) the ability to visually check port alignment in the treatment position immediately before irradiation, and (c) decreased chance of human and equipment error by eliminating the need for measurements and calculations at the time of treatment. Our method can be used for SSD or SAD techniques and, with minor adjustment, is applicable for establishment of coplanar cephalad field borders as required at the junction of a supraclavicular field.

Three-port perineal sparing technique.

The records were reviewed of 103 patients with low-lying pelvic malignancies irradiated with a skin-sparing technique involving use of a pair of anteroposterior-posteroanterior opposed ports and a direct perineal port. Patients had rectal, anal, cervical, vaginal, urethral, or vulvar cancer. Use of a special lead compensator allowed the three beams to be applied perpendicularly to the surface, while delivery of a homogeneous dose to the pelvis and perineum was maintained. Skin dose with this method was greatly reduced compared with that delivered with simple opposing or four-port techniques, in which irradiation is tangential to the surface at the perineum. Acute perineal skin irritation was assigned a grade between 0 and 3, with grade 0 representing the least amount of irritation. All patients were in the grade 0 or grade 1 category. Patients treated for low-lying rectal carcinoma showed no increase in perineal recurrences when compared with historic control subjects. Use of this approach allowed delivery of adequate doses to the pelvis and perineum and a definite decrease in local toxic effects, and local control was not compromised.