Interprofessional relationships and their impact on resident hospitalizations in nursing homes: A qualitative study.

AIM: The aim of this study is to explore experiences and perspectives of nurses and providers (e.g., physicians, medical directors, fellows, and nurse practitioners) on reducing preventable hospitalizations of nursing home (NH) residents in relation to interprofessional relationship and hospitalization decision-making process. BACKGROUND: Preventable NH resident hospitalization continues to be a pressing public health issue. Studies show that improved interprofessional relationship may help reduce hospitalization, yet research on communication processes and interactions among different NH staff remains limited. METHODS: This is a qualitative descriptive study. Two focus groups were held with fourteen nurses and thirteen in-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with providers from two Chicagoland NHs. Focus group sessions and interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for common themes based on qualitative description method. RESULTS: All study participants agreed that providers have the ultimate responsibility for hospitalization decisions. However, nurses believed they could influence those decisions, depending on provider characteristics, trust, and resident conditions. Nurses and providers differed in the way they experienced and conveyed emotions, and differed in key elements affecting hospitalization decisions such as structural or environmental factors (e.g., lacking staff and equipment at the facility, poor communication between the NH and hospitals) and interpersonal factors (e.g., characteristics of effective nurses or providers and the effective interactions between them). CONCLUSIONS: Interpersonal factors, including perceived competence, respect, and trust, may influence NH hospitalization decisions and be targeted for reducing preventable hospitalizations of residents.

Pilot study of a culturally sensitive intervention to promote genetic counseling for breast cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of genetic counseling and testing, uptake of cancer genetic services is generally low and Black/African American (Black) women are substantially less likely to receive genetic services than non-Hispanic White women. Our team developed a culturally sensitive, narrative decision aid video to promote uptake of genetic counseling among Black women at risk for a hereditary breast cancer syndrome that can be incorporated in conjunction with population-based cancer risk assessment in a clinical setting. We report here a pilot study to demonstrate changes in intention to access genetic counseling and intervention satisfaction. METHODS: Black women who were personally unaffected by breast cancer and were recommended for genetic counseling based on family history screening in a mammography center were recruited at the time of the mammogram. A prospective, pre-post survey study design, guided by theoretical constructs, was used to evaluate baseline and immediate post-intervention psychosocial factors, including intention to participate in genetic counseling and intervention satisfaction. RESULTS: Pilot recruitment goals were met (n = 30). Pre-intervention, 50% of participants indicated that they were extremely likely to make a genetic counseling appointment, compared with 70% post-intervention (p = 0.05). After watching the intervention, 50% of participants indicated that the video changed their mind regarding genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated cultural satisfaction with a decision aid intervention designed to motivate Black women with hereditary breast cancer risk to attend a genetic counseling appointment. Our study showed that intention may be a specific and key construct to target in interventions designed to support decision-making about genetic services. Study results informed the design of a subsequent large scale, randomized implementation study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04082117 . Registered September 9, 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Long-term outcomes following failure of Nissen fundoplication.

PURPOSE: To determine the management and outcomes of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) that requires further intervention following failure of Nissen fundoplication (NF). METHODS: After institutional audit department approval, a retrospective review of paediatric patients who had further intervention following failure of primary NF between January 2006 and December 2015 for GOR at our centre was performed. Data are presented as median (range). RESULTS: Of 820 patients who underwent NF, 190 (23%) received further procedures for GOR management at a median of 21 months of age (6-186); 90/190 (47%) had gastro-jejunal feeding (GJ). Of these, 67 (74%) remained on GJ feeds up to a median of 48 months and 23/90 (26%) had a second NF after GJ feeding. 97/190 (51%) had a redo fundoplication without having had a GJ; thus, 120/190 (63%) of patients having a further procedure went on to have a second NF after a median period of 15 months (1-70 months). Three patients (2%) had early emergency wrap revision 4 days after first fundoplication (we classed this as an 'early complication'). Of the seven patients who failed a 3rd NF, 4 continued GJ feeding, 2 of had oesophagogastric dissociation; 2 had 4th NF of which 1 was successful and 1 patient had gastric pacemaker and is successfully feeding orally. Patients who were finally successfully managed with GJ underwent 2 (2-5) tube changes/year. We found patients who had a previous GJ were more likely to have failure of the redo fundoplication than those who had not to have the GJ (16/24 vs. 30/90, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The chance of success decreases with every further attempt at fundoplication. The only factor significantly associated with failure of redo fundoplication was whether the patient previously had a GJ tube. In patients with failed fundoplications, when symptom free on jejunal feedings, further anti-reflux surgical intervention should be avoided. A randomized prospective study is needed for patient selection.