Distance education. Part 1. Conceptualization and development.

INTRODUCTION: The Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine were developed at Monash University as distance education courses from a previous on-campus version of a Masters course in response to real and perceived needs for more flexible forms of delivery. METHOD: Conceptualization and development involved consultation with experts in distance education and the application of adult learning principles, phenomenology and constructivism in course design. CONCLUSION: Despite initial difficulties and delays, course objectives were met through the application of standardised distance learning and teaching methods applied to four core and 15 clinical elective subjects. These were developed within a three year period for delivery in a predominantly paper based format.

Distance education. Part 4. Supervision of family medicine research at a distance. A formative evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: A survey on supervision of research projects was undertaken among current general practitioner students, recent graduates and supervisors of a Masters of Family Medicine degree. The aim was to describe and compare the experience of the three groups and, in particular, to identify the problems associated with distance supervision. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire survey was distributed to current students (n = 21), graduates (n = 16) and current supervisors (n = 7). RESULTS: Forty out of 44 doctors returned completed questionnaires. Distance was a relatively minor barrier to successful supervision, provided that the student and supervisor established good communication patterns and were able to respond to each other with minimal delay. The commencement of the study and its final write-up were critical phases in the supervision process. DISCUSSION: Communication, including emotional and psychological support, was at least as important as expert opinion in helping Masters students to successfully complete their research projects. Attention must be paid to establishing good understanding and regular means of communication at the beginning of the supervisory process.

Distance education. Part 5. Family medicine research at a distance. Guidelines for supervisors.

INTRODUCTION: This paper recommends guidelines for the supervision of Masters degrees or similar postgraduate courses, in which research projects are supervised at a distance. METHODS: The guidelines are based on the experiences of the authors with a five year old Masters of Family Medicine degree and a formative evaluation conducted by questionnaire survey among its students, graduates and supervisors. RESULTS: It is important to establish ground rules for communication at an early point in the supervisory process. Supervisors need to take into account psychosocial, pedagogical and organisational aspects of their mentorship of students. DISCUSSION: These guidelines are relevant to courses where there remains a strong one-to-one relationship between supervisors and students. In these cases, 'distance' need not be a barrier provided that both sides are aware of and committed to maintaining good patterns of communications with each other.

Distance education. Part 3. Assessment of and feedback to students at a distance.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of students at distance, in a course with over 20 units (subjects), provides special challenges in providing timely, accurate and detailed feedback both formatively and summatively. METHOD: A description of assessment practices including reflective journals, essays, critical appraisal of literature, case studies or teaching presentations in video and written format, clinical audits, and large research projects is provided. The impact of a multitude of criterion-referenced methods of students, teachers and administrative services as well as quality assurance issues are measured. CONCLUSION: Students preferred multiple levels of formative and summative assessment using criterion referencing to exams. These methods were thought to be contextually relevant to clinical practice and examined knowledge, cognition and performance appropriately. Length of assessment task, difficulty with English as a second language and lack of detail or clarity on written feedback posed problems for a number of students. Quality assurance procedures have been put into place to rectify some of these problems.

Distance education. Part 2. Student characteristics, program characteristics, administration and future direction.

INTRODUCTION: A descriptive analysis of student and program characteristics was undertaken. METHOD: Data were obtained using student enrollment forms, periodic surveys and regular feedback which formed part of the formative evaluation. RESULTS: In the five year period 1992-1996, 433 doctors enrolled in the Graduate Diploma, of which 56 proceeded onto Masters. Of the 433, 60% were male. The mean age of students was 41 years, with rural (49%) and solo (45%) practitioners over-represented; 20% held the FRACGP and 15% resided outside Australia. Around 20% deferred or withdrew during the five year period. Of the 56 Masters enrollments, 16 had completed the degree in minimum time, with a further 30 completing within two years. Reasons for enrollment were largely professional with many students expressing the need to overcome isolation and gain intellectual stimulation. CONCLUSION: This Diploma/Masters course which has a strong clinical component has attracted considerable interest among established general practitioners. The program appears to have succeeded because of its flexible delivery, lack of exclusive research orientation and its firm grounding in general practice.