Polypoid mucosal prolapse complicating low rectal adenomas: beware the inflammatory cloacogenic polyp!

AIMS: Polypoid mucosal prolapse near the anorectal junction mimics adenomas endoscopically and histopathologically. The aim was to describe the phenomenon of polypoid mucosal prolapse arising secondary to adenomas at the anorectal junction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four cases of low rectal adenoma with polypoid mucosal prolapse were assessed histopathologically, as well as with p53 and Ki67 antibodies. Two were male and two female; the mean age was 45 years. Available follow-up has revealed no recurrence in any patient. All cases showed mucosal expansion with ulceration or erosion, crypt architectural irregularity, fibromuscular proliferation between crypts and variable epithelial serration and inflammation. Each case also showed unequivocal dysplasia, often co-mingled with features of prolapse, highlighted by p53 and Ki67 immunohistochemistry, which demonstrated positivity within dysplastic areas. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologists must recognize the potential for adenomatous/dysplastic foci in anorectal lesions to superficially resemble inflammatory cloacogenic polyps. We recommend use of immunomarkers p53 and Ki67 to aid the interpretation of challenging cases. We believe that polypoid mucosal prolapse changes can be a secondary phenomenon, due to adenomas close to or at the anorectal junction.

Gastrointestinal Kaposi's sarcoma: CD117 expression and the potential for misdiagnosis as gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

AIMS: Gastrointestinal Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) may mimic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) histologically. Studies have shown that KS outside the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may express CD117, an antibody usually used to support a diagnosis of GIST. The aim was to evaluate the clinicopathological features of GI KS, including the expression of CD117 with and without antigen retrieval. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen GI KS were assessed histologically, 12 of which were also subjected to immunohistochemistry for CD34, human herpesvirus (HHV) 8, DOG1 and CD117. CD117 immunohistochemistry was performed with and without antigen retrieval. All cases showed an infiltrative spindle cell tumour. Lamina propria infiltration, lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, extravasated red blood cells and haemosiderin were typical histological features. In all cases tumour cells were positive for CD34 and HHV8, but negative for DOG1. CD117 was positive in four of 12 cases without antigen retrieval and 10 of 12 cases with antigen retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: The microscopic distinction of GI KS from GIST can be difficult. Clues that raise the possibility of GI KS include young patient age, a history of immunosuppression, lamina propria infiltration, lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, extravasated red blood cells and haemosiderin deposition. Use of the immunomarkers CD117 (without antigen retrieval), HHV8 and DOG1 may aid in the distinction between GI KS and GIST.

Clinical significance of the RT-PCR positive sentinel node in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of RT-PCR positivity for melanoma markers in the sentinel node remains controversial. Our purpose was to determine whether patients with a histologically negative but RT-PCR positive node were at an increased risk for recurrence than their RT-PCR negative counterparts. METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients underwent sentinel node biopsies for melanoma between 1998 and 2000. Each sentinel node was bivalved. Half was serially sectioned and examined by routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC; S100, HMB-45, melanA, and tyrosinase). The other half was analyzed by a nested RT-PCR assay for tyrosinase. RESULTS: Patients were followed for recurrence with a mean follow-up of 71.1 months. The odds ratio of recurrence for RT-PCR positive versus RT-PCR negative patients was 1.39 (0.34, 5.62; p = 0.73). Within the histology negative subgroups, the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR positive group (26.7%) was not significantly different from the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR negative group (22.2%) (p = 0.33 chi-squared). RT-PCR of the sentinel node was not a predictor for recurrence on multivariate analysis (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Sentinel node RT-PCR positivity did not risk stratify histologically negative melanoma patients beyond routine pathologic examination in this series.

Granular cell tumours of the gastrointestinal tract: expression of nestin and clinicopathological evaluation of 11 patients.

AIMS: Granular cell tumours (GCTs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are rare, with few series reported in the literature. Nestin is a recently identified intermediate filament protein that is expressed in neuroectodermal stem cells and skeletal muscle progenitor cells and has been shown to be expressed in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and GI schwannomas. Herein, we describe the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 11 GI GCTs, introducing nestin as an additional marker that identifies these tumours. METHODS AND RESULTS: The archives of the departments of pathology at London Health Sciences Centre (London, Ontario) and St Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario) were searched for GCTs occurring in the GI tract, yielding 11 cases. Histological features were assessed and immunohistochemistry was performed with S100 protein, nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), CD34, desmin, CD117, and inhibin-alpha. Charts were reviewed for clinical information. Ages at diagnosis ranged from 31 to 73 years; there were six males and four females. All GCTs were solitary, six in the oesophagus, three in the caecum, one in the rectum and one perianal. Most lesions were discovered incidentally. The size of the GCTs ranged from 4 mm to 30 mm. All were submucosal, typically firm, with a white-yellow appearance. Histologically, the GCTs showed moderate cellularity, predominantly solid growth with areas of nesting. While lesional cells were mainly plump and polygonal, areas of spindling were present in several tumours, more frequently in the colorectum. Margins were circumscribed. Nuclei were round to oval, with even chromatin and small nucleoli. Mitoses were rare to absent and necrosis was absent in all cases. Staining with periodic acid-Schiff, with diastase predigestion, showed globular and diffuse positivity within the cytoplasm. Moderate to strong expression of S100 protein and nestin was observed in 11 of 11 and seven of seven tumours, respectively. GFAP, CD34, desmin, CD117 and inhibin-alpha were negative. While patients were variably managed with resection or observation, all remain clinically well, without disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, GI GCTs have characteristic clinicopathological features. Nestin may be a useful immunohistochemical marker for identifying these tumours; the presence of this persistent stem cell cytoskeletal filament within GI GCTs suggests that these lesions may arise from a multipotential stem cell in the GI tract.