Vertical incision intraoral silicone chin augmentation.

OBJECTIVE: Solid silicone augmentation mentoplasty is a common procedure with consistent aesthetic results in properly selected patients. While many plastic surgeons employ the external approach, the intraoral method affords excellent aesthetic outcomes while avoiding an external scar. This is the largest series in the literature describing the midline intraoral incision approach with minimal disruption of soft tissues. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent chin augmentation with solid silicone implants between 2004 and 2010. Among these implants, 105 were placed transorally. Eighty-five patients were followed for at least 1 year. Demographic information, indications, patient satisfaction questionnaire results, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: All implants yielded satisfactory results with no displacement, infection, tissue reaction, lower lip incompetence, mental nerve injury, or intraoral implant contamination. Two cases of superficial mucosal irritation at the suture site were observed and resolved without consequence. Symmetry, projection, and overall balance of facial components were excellent. Although all patients were satisfied with the functional and aesthetic results, 20% stated they would like further augmentation. Patients were extremely satisfied with the lack of an external scar. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our series, the intraoral technique with a midline incision avoiding disruption of the mentalis muscle is recommended for its ease, simplicity, patient satisfaction, low complication rate, and circumvention of an external scar. The external approach should be considered in cases that require a very large implant.

Nasal dorsal augmentation with silicone implants.

Silicone rubber has been used safely and effectively for facial augmentation for nearly 5 decades in eastern Asia. We have used silicone rubber nasal implants in primary ethnic rhinoplasty and have found consistent and long-lasting results with low complication rates. Silicone dorsal nasal augmentation in primary rhinoplasty avoids donor site morbidity and implant resorption as seen with autogenous implants. Silicone nasal implants have a low extrusion and infection rate. In the appropriate patient with proper placement, silicone nasal implant is nearly the ideal implant material.

Temporoparietal osteofascial flap for head and neck reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This article describes the use of the temporoparietal osteofascial flap (TOF) for reconstruction of bony defects in the midface and mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the demographics, etiology, indications, surgical technique, radiographic evaluation, and final outcome of 11 patients with upper or lower jaw defects who underwent reconstruction using the TOF between 1994 and 1999. RESULTS: The TOF was used to reconstruct a defect of the mandible in 7 patients, the hard palate in 2 patients, the maxilla in 1 patient, and the zygoma in 1 patient. The defect was a result of tumor resection in 9 patients and of trauma in 2 patients. The defect size ranged from 3 to 6 cm. Ten flaps (91%) were successful and 1 flap failed. There was 1 donor site complication (small dural tear) that was repaired immediately without sequelae. One patient had osseointegrated dental implants placed in the bone with good results. Exploration of the construction area was performed in 1 patient 13 months after surgery because of recurrent tumor. It showed a fully integrated bone flap. CONCLUSION: This vascularized calvarial bone flap can be used for the reconstruction of small to medium-sized defects of the maxilla and lateral mandible with good functional and cosmetic results. It can be performed without special microvascular expertise and with minimal donor site morbidity. A full-thickness bone flap can support osseointegrated dental implants.

Can patient satisfaction with decisions predict compliance with surgery?

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction with treatment decisions is a discrete and measurable component of the satisfaction paradigm, distinct from satisfaction with health care services. OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to determine if the Satisfaction With Decision (SWD) scale, a valid and reliable 6-item survey, can predict patient compliance with surgery proposed by their otolaryngologist. DESIGN: Prospective study using the SWD scale plus measures of office visit satisfaction, provider satisfaction, and disease-specific quality of life. SETTING: Metropolitan, private nonprofit hospital. PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 151 patients scheduled for surgery, with a median age of 5.8 years and an age range of 0.6 to 65.3 years. INTERVENTIONS: At the time surgery was scheduled, the decision-maker completed a 12-item questionnaire about satisfaction and quality of life that included the SWD scale. Noncompliant patients were contacted, and the specific reason for cancellation was ascertained. RESULTS: The strongest predictor of surgical cancellation was the SWD survey score, with a median value of 4.8 for patients completing surgery compared with 3.8 for those who cancelled (P < 0.001). Patients with scores <4.0 had a 57% cancellation rate, whereas those with scores > or =4.0 had a 98% completion rate. Patients were also more likely to cancel if it was their first visit with the surgeon (P = 0.004) or if they were responsible for their own decisions (P = 0.007). Cancellations were not associated with office visit satisfaction, patient quality of life, or demographic characteristics of the decision-maker. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are satisfied with their initial decision to undergo surgery are most likely to comply with planned therapy. Conversely, patients who score <4.0 on the SWD scale may benefit from additional preoperative counseling to increase the likelihood of compliance.