72-Hour transport recovery of antimicrobial resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates using the InTray® GC method.

Recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates exposed to a range of transport times and temperatures was quantitatively assessed for two transport devices, BioMed Diagnostics' InTray GC® and Copan Diagnostics' Liquid Amies Elution Swab (ESwab®) Collection and Transport System. Respective devices were inoculated with N. gonorrhoeae, exposed to simulated transport conditions and spread-plated from serial dilutions in duplicates onto chocolate agar in order to count CFU (colony-forming units) in the range of 25-250. Baseline CFU/mL averages of time-zero transport for each device was compared to either 24 hour (Eswab) or 72 hour (InTray GC) CFU/mL average to assess recovery of six clinical isolates of N. gonorrhoeae, and differences showing no greater than a 3 log10 (± 10%) decline between comparative time points qualified as acceptable. Our findings suggest that the InTray GC system has the potential to transport clinical isolates for ≤72 hours with acceptable N. gonorrhoeae recovery.

Pooled 3-Anatomic-Site Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pooled testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) may be a cost-saving solution to increase screening by simplifying testing procedures and reducing resource burdens. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the performance of pooled 3-anatomic-site testing (pharyngeal, rectal, and urogenital sites) for CT and NG in comparison with single-anatomic-site testing. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify original evaluation studies of the performance of pooled testing for CT and NG infections and identified 14 studies for inclusion. Each study was systematically evaluated for bias. We conducted bivariate fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses using a full Bayesian method of the positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement. RESULTS: The combined positive percent agreement for CT was 93.11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.51%-94.55%), and the negative percent agreement was 99.44% (95% CI, 99.18%-99.65%). For NG, the combined positive percent agreement was 93.80% (95% CI, 90.26%-96.61%), and the negative percent agreement was 99.73% (95% CI, 99.30%-99.97%). CONCLUSIONS: We found that pooled 3-anatomic-site tests performed similarly to single-anatomic-site tests for the detection of CT and NG. The pooled 3-anatomic-site tests have the added potential benefit of reduced cost and resource requirement, which could lead to improved testing access and screening uptake.