Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes after dynamic stabilization without fusion in degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Frequent complications of posterolateral instrumented fusion have been reported after treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. The use of dynamic stabilization without fusion can be advocated to reduce such adverse effects, being less invasive, with shorter operation time and less blood loss. No study in the literature has analyzed outcomes of dynamic stabilization without fusion in these degenerative deformities. METHODS: Twenty-nine elderly patients (average age, 68.5 years; range, 61-78) with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, undergoing dynamic stabilization (Dynesys system) without fusion combined with decompressive laminectomy, in cases with associated stenosis, were analyzed. Stenosis of the vertebral canal was associated in 27 patients (93.1%); 13 cases (44.8%) also presented a degenerative spondylolisthesis. An independent spine surgeon retrospectively reviewed all the patients' medical records and radiographs to assess operative data and surgery-related complications. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up questionnaires were obtained to evaluate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 54 months (range, 39-68). Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and back pain and leg pain visual analogue scale scores received a statistically significant improvement at last control; the mean improvement was 51.6% for Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.01), 58.2% for Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (P = 0.01), 51.7% for leg pain (P = 0.02), and 57.8% for back pain (P = 0.01). Radiographically, degenerative scoliosis and associated spondylolisthesis resulted stable at follow-up with a moderate correction: the average scoliosis Cobb angle was 16.9 degrees (range, 12 degrees -37 degrees) before surgery and 11.1 degrees (range, 4 degrees -26 degrees) at last follow-up, with a 37.5% mean correction (P = 0.01); the anterior vertebral translation was 18.9% (range, 12%-27%) before surgery and 17% (range, 0%-27%) at follow-up, for a 14.6% mean correction (range, 0%-100%) (P = 0.02). No implant-related complications (screw loosening or breakage) or loss of correction were observed. Four cases (13.8%) presented an asymptomatic radiolucent line around screws of the S1 level without screw loosening. Six patients (20.7%) showed minor complications (ileus in 2 cases, urinary tract infection in 2, transient postoperative delirium in one, and respiratory difficulties after surgery in another patient). In 2 other patients (6.8%) incurred major complications, both requiring a revision surgery, for a misplaced screw on L5 and junctional disc degeneration at the lower level respectively. No neurologic complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Dynamic stabilization with pedicle screws in addition to decompressive laminectomy resulted a safe procedure in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis; it was able to maintain enough stability to prevent progression of scoliosis and instability, enabling a wide laminectomy in cases of associated lumbar stenosis. This nonfusion stabilization technique was less aggressive than instrumented fusion and obtained a statistically significant improvement of the clinical outcome at last follow-up.

Two-level total lumbar disc replacement.

Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) has been widely used as a treatment option for 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease. However, recent studies have presented conflicting results and some authors concluded that outcome deteriorated when disc replacement was performed bisegmentally, with an increase of complications for bisegmental replacements in comparison with monosegmental disc arthroplasty. The goal of the present retrospective study is to investigate results in a group of patients who have received bisegmental TDR with SB Charitè III artificial disc for degenerative disc disease with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, and to compare the results of 2-level disc replacement versus 1-level patients treated with the same prosthesis. A total of 32 patients had at least 3-years follow-up and were reviewed. The average age of the patients was 38.5 years. There were 11 males and 21 females. About 16 patients received 2-level TDR (SB Charitè III) and 16 received 1-level TDR (SB Charitè III). Both radiographic and functional outcome analysis, including patient's satisfaction, was performed. There were no signs of degenerative changes of the adjacent segments in any case of the 2- or 1-level TDR. There was no statistically significant difference between 2- and 1-level TDR both at 12 months and at 3-years follow-up on functional outcome scores. There was a statistically insignificant difference concerning the patients satisfaction between 1- and 2-level surgeries at the last follow-up (P = 0.46). In the 2-level TDR patients, there were 5 minor complications (31.25%), whereas major complications occurred in 4 more patients (25%) and required a new surgery in 2 cases (12.5%). In the 1-level cases there were 2 minor complications (12.5%) and 2 major complications (12.5%) and a new revision surgery was required in 1 patient (6.25%). In conclusion, the use of 2-level disc replacement at last follow-up presented a higher incidence of complications than in cases with 1-level replacement. At the same time it was impossible to delineate a clear difference in evaluating the questionnaires between the follow-up results of patients receiving 2- and 1-level TDR: the 2-level group presented slightly lower scores at follow-up, but none was statistically significant.

Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

The treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of more than 80 degrees traditionally consisted of a combined procedure, an anterior release performed through an open thoracotomy followed by a posterior fusion. Recently, some studies have reassessed the role of posterior fusion only as treatment for severe thoracic AIS; the correction rate of the thoracic curves was comparable to most series of combined anterior and posterior surgery, with shorter surgery time and without the negative effect on pulmonary function of anterior transthoracic exposure. Compared with other studies published so far on the use of posterior fusion alone for severe thoracic AIS, the present study examines a larger group of patients (52 cases) reviewed at a longer follow-up (average 6.7 years, range 4.5-8.5 years). The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of surgical treatment for severe thoracic (>80 degrees) AIS treated with posterior spinal fusion alone, and compare comprehensively the results of posterior fusion with a hybrid construct (proximal hooks and distal pedicle screws) versus a pedicle screw instrumentation. All patients (n = 52) with main thoracic AIS curves greater than 80 degrees (Lenke type 1, 2, 3, and 4), surgically treated between 1996 and 2000 at one institution, by posterior spinal fusion either with hybrid instrumentation (PSF-H group; n = 27 patients), or with pedicle screw-only construct (PSF-S group; n = 25 patients) were reviewed. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age, Risser's sign, Cobb preoperative main thoracic (MT) curve magnitude (PSF-H: 92 degrees vs. PSF-S: 88 degrees), or flexibility on bending films (PSF-H: 27% vs. PSF-S: 25%). Statistical analysis was performed using the t test (paired and unpaired), Wilcoxon test for non-parametric paired analysis, and the Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric unpaired analysis. At the last follow-up, the PSF-S group, when compared to the PSF-H group had a final MT correction rate of 52.4 versus 44.52% (P = 0.001), with a loss of -1.9 degrees versus -11.3 degrees (P = 0.0005), a TL/L correction of 50 versus 43% (ns), a greater correction of the lowest instrumented vertebra translation (-1.00 vs. -0.54 cm; P = 0.04), and tilt (-19 degrees vs. -10 degrees; P = 0.005) on the coronal plane. There were no statistically significant differences in sagittal and global coronal alignment between the two groups (C7-S1 offset: PSF-H = 0.5 cm vs. PSF-S = 0 cm). In the hybrid series (27 patients) surgery-related complications necessitated three revision surgeries, whereas in the screw group (25 patients) one revision surgery was performed. No neurological complications or deep wound infection occurred in this series. In conclusion, posterior spinal fusion for severe thoracic AIS with pedicle screws only, when compared to hybrid construct, allowed a greater coronal correction of both main thoracic and secondary lumbar curves, less loss of the postoperative correction achieved, and fewer revision surgeries. Posterior-only fusion with pedicle screws enabled a good and stable correction of severe scoliosis. However, severe curves may be amenable to hybrid instrumentation that produced analogous results to the screws-only constructs concerning patient satisfaction; at the latest follow-up, SRS-30 and SF-36 scores did not show any statistical differences between the two groups.

Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze complications with thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment at our Department over a 3-year period (1999-2001). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of pedicle screws remains controversial for thoracic scoliosis for fear of complications. METHODS: A total of 115 consecutive patients who underwent posterior fusion using 1035 transpedicular thoracic screws were reviewed. All patients presented a main thoracic scoliosis with a mean Cobb angle of 75.4 degrees (range, 60 degrees -105 degrees ). For thoracic screw placement, a mini-laminotomy technique was used, inserting a spatula inside the vertebral canal to palpate the borders of the pedicle. Postoperative CT scan was used in 25 patients (21.7%) to study a total of 311 screws, when the screw position was questionable. RESULTS: An independent spine surgeon retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of the patients, at a mean follow-up of 4 years. There were 18 screws misplaced (1.7%) in a total of 13 patients (11.3%). Screw malposition was symptomatic only in 1 patient (pleural effusion and fever) and asymptomatic in the other 12 cases (10.4%). Other complications included intraoperative pedicle fractures in 15 patients (13%), dural tears (without neurologic complications) in 14 cases (12.1%), and superficial wound infections in 2 (1.7%). Another operation for screw removal was performed in 5 patients (4.3%), due to pleural effusion (in 1 case), asymptomatic late lateral loosening of a malpositioned screw (in 1), and the possible future risks related the intrathoracic screw position despite the lack of any symptoms (in 3). Two cases (1.7%) were retreated due to wound infection, without removing instrumentation. There was no loss of correction at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis patients requires utmost caution. The mini-laminotomy technique was beneficial in increasing safety of the procedure with an acceptable incidence of complications.

Evidence of a linkage between matrilin-1 gene (MATN1) and idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, a number of genes, associated with spine musculoskeletal deformity phenotypes in mouse and in synteny between mouse and man, were identified as candidate genes for IS. Among these genes, MATN1, which carries a polymorphic microsatellite marker within its sequence, was selected for a linkage analysis. MATN1 is localised at 1p35 and is mainly expressed in cartilage. The objective of this study was to assess a linkage disequilibrium between the matrilin-1 (MATN1) gene and the idiopathic scoliosis (IS). METHODS: The genetic study was conducted on a population of 81 trios, each consistent of a daughter/son affected by idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and both parents. In all trios components, the region of MATN1 gene containing the microsatellite marker was amplified by a polymerase chain reaction. The amplicons were analysed by a DNA sequencer-genotyper. The statistical linkage analysis was performed using the extended transmission/disequilibrium test. RESULTS: Three microsatellite polymorphisms, respectively consisting of 103 bp, 101 bp and 99 bp, were identified. ETDT evidenced a significant preferential transmission for the 103 bp allele (Chi-square = 5.058, df = 1, P = 0.024) CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the familial idiopathic scoliosis is associated to the MATN1 gene.

Surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of results of patients with Marfan syndrome treated with instrumented posterior fusion alone for scoliosis. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have been reported in the literature on surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome, analyzing long-term results of posterior instrumented fusion. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with Marfan syndrome with a mean age of 17 years (range, 11-31 years) were treated surgically from 1982 to 1995 for scoliosis, using a posterior instrumented fusion alone (Harrington rod with sublaminar wires in the first 16 cases, and a more recent hybrid instrumentation in the remaining 7 cases). All of the patients received a long posterior instrumented fusion, including 12.3 levels on average (range, 9-17), extending the fusion area to vertebrae that were neutral and stable in both coronal and sagittal planes before surgery. Patients were analyzed as two different groups (Group 1 and Group 2) according to the different posterior instrumentations employed: Group 1 included 16 patients treated by the Harrington distraction rod technique with sublaminar wires, while Group 2 included 7 patients treated using more recent hybrid instrumentations. Presentation features, complications, and results were analyzed. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 7 years (maximum, 18 years), all 23 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 26.8 years (range, 20-38 years). The average preoperative scoliosis value of 69.91 degrees was initially corrected to 38.17 degrees, averaged 40.89 degrees 1 year after surgery, and was finally equal to 44.09 degrees at the last follow-up. Differences in terms of scoliosis correction achieved with different instrumentations (Groups 1 and 2) did not reach statistical significance. In Group 2 patients, the percentage of postoperative correction was slightly lower (44.23%) than that of Group 1 (46.55%) but remained more stable at the last follow-up (40.97% vs. 36.38% of Group 1). There were 11 complications in 10 of the 23 patients (43.4%); two complications occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperatively, dural tears occurred in 2 cases (8.6%). Pseudarthrosis with instrumentation failure in 2 cases (8.6%) required revision surgery. Five (21.7%) distal hook dislodgements with moderate loss of scoliosis correction, 1 (4.3%) mild loss of correction without instrumentation failure, and 1 asymptomatic cervicothoracic junctional kyphosis. did not require surgery. All complications occurred among the 16 Group 1 patients, treated using the Harrington rod instrumentation with sublaminar wires. CONCLUSIONS: These results seemed to demonstrate that a satisfactory stabilization of scoliosis can be achieved by posterior instrumentation alone in patients with Marfan syndrome. Instrumented posterior fusion should be extended to include vertebrae that are neutral and stable in both coronal and sagittal planes before surgery, in order to ensure stabilization of the deformity and reduce the risks of decompensation of the spine.

C1-C2 posterior fusion in growing patients: long-term follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients undergoing C1-C2 posterior fusion during childhood was undertaken. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the change in the sagittal curvature of the cervical spine in children after C1-C2 posterior fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been only a few reports on postoperative changes in the sagittal curvature of the cervical spine after C1-C2 posterior fusion in children. However, they have all described the onset of sagittal postoperative cervical deformities. METHODS: Between January 1977 and December 1992, a total of 12 children underwent C1-C2 posterior fusion for atlantoaxial instability resulting from congenital malformation in eight, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in one, and rotatory subluxation in three. The average age at the time of surgery was 10.9 years (range 7-12 years). All children underwent a similar treatment program with gradual preoperative reduction in halo cast, followed by C1-C2 posterior fusion with Mersilene loops in two cases, wiring in eight (Gallie's or Brooks' techniques), and interlaminar clamps in the remaining two. The halo cast made it possible to avoid a hyperextended or hyperflexed C1-C2 position while performing the atlantoaxial fusion, thus ensuring a more anatomic position during C1-C2 fusion. In the postoperative period, the halo cast was maintained for 7 to 9 weeks. RESULTS Follow-up ranged from 7 years to 13 years. Preoperative alignment of the cervical spine was classified into two groups: lordosis (eight patients) and straight (four patients). Postoperative subaxial malalignment (kyphosis) occurred in four cases (33%): these patients showed evidence of spontaneous and gradual sagittal improvement and presented either a straight (two cases) or a lordotic (two cases) cervical spine at follow-up. Immediately after surgery, the cervical spine was normally aligned in the remaining eight patients (lordosis and straight alignment in six and two cases, respectively) and was unchanged at follow-up. At follow-up, none of the 12 patients had a cervical deformity on sagittal plane. CONCLUSION: In children, a spontaneous realignment of the subaxial kyphosis observed after C1-C2 posterior fusion can be noted at follow-up, when a postoperative deformity occurs (33% in the present series). According to the present findings, it is not always mandatory to perform occipitocervical fusion in children with atlantoaxial instability just to prevent subaxial deformity in the cervical spine.

Treatment of spinal fractures in children and adolescents: long-term results in 44 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: The authors examined a case series of patients younger than 16 years who had sustained a traumatic spine injury. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical and radiologic findings and the effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment at long-term follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although injuries to children have received increasing coverage in the literature over the last several years, few reports have focused on the long-term results of conservative versus surgical treatment. METHODS: Forty-four patients who had sustained a traumatic spine injury at the average age of 14 years (range 3-16 years) were clinically and radiographically reviewed. The fractures were separated into three groups: stable (n = 20) and unstable (n = 13) injuries without cord lesion and fractures with spinal cord lesion (n = 11). Mean follow-up was 18 years (range 9-23 years). RESULTS: Conservative treatment was successful in all stable fractures, whereas it failed in the unstable injuries. The surgical treatment stabilized without significant deformity in five of the seven unstable fractures. Of 11 with spinal cord injuries, the 4 children conservatively treated developed a severely progressive, paralytic scoliosis. Only three of the seven surgically treated patients were stabilized without any deformity at follow-up. CONCLUSION: In children and adolescents, conservative treatment is an available option for stable fractures without neurologic lesion. Early surgical treatment (instrumentation and fusion) is mandatory for unstable fractures and injuries associated with spinal cord lesion. In children, a traumatic spinal cord lesion may develop a deformity that is mainly scoliotic, kyphotic, or lordotic in >90% of the cases.

Surgical treatment of scoliosis in myelomeningocele.

The high incidence and rapid progression of scoliosis in myelomeningocele make it one of the most disabling aspects of such disease. The choice of the surgical procedure to treat scoliosis in myelomeningocele is related to the peculiar features of this deformity. The purpose of this study is to review the results obtained by means of various surgical techniques and verify if posterior fusion with pedicle screws can improve results as compared to the single posterior approach. Patients were classified into three groups defined by treatment approach. The single posterior approach following either the Harrington or the Harrington-Luque technique yielded the least satisfactory results. The two-stage anterior-posterior spinal fusion provided good correction and stability. Correction and instrumented fusion through a single posterior approach with segmental fixation by means of pedicle screws proved to be valid and reliable, even when severe deformities had to be corrected and fused. In these latter cases pelvic fixation using ilio-sacral plates also made it possible to correct and stabilize pelvic obliquity.