Addressing Implementation Challenges to Digital Care Delivery for Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Stakeholder Feedback in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Digital tools accessed via smartphones can promote chronic condition management, reduce disparities in health care and hospital readmissions, and improve quality of life. However, whether digital care strategies can be implemented successfully on a large scale with traditionally underserved populations remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: As part of a randomized trial comparing care delivery strategies for Medicaid and Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions, our stakeholders identified implementation challenges, and we developed stakeholder-driven adaptions to improve a digitally delivered care management strategy (high-tech care). METHODS: We used 4 mechanisms (study support log, Patient Partners Work Group log, case interview log, and implementation meeting minutes) to capture stakeholder feedback about technology-related challenges and solutions from 9 patient partners, 129 participants, and 32 care managers and used these data to develop and implement solutions. To assess the impact, we analyzed high-tech care exit surveys and intervention engagement outcomes (video visits and condition-specific text message check-ins sent at varying intervals) before and after each solution was implemented. RESULTS: Challenges centered around 2 themes: difficulty using both smartphones and high-tech care components and difficulty using high-tech care components due to connectivity issues. To respond to the first theme's challenges, we devised 3 solutions: tech visits (eg, in-person technology support visits), tech packet (eg, participant-facing technology user guide), and tailored condition-specific text message check-ins. During the first 20 months of implementation, 73 participants received at least one tech visit. We observed a 15% increase in video call completion for participants with data before and after the tech visit (n=25) and a 7% increase in check-in completion for participants with data before and after the tech visit (n=59). Of the 379 participants given a tech packet, 179 completed care during this timeframe and were eligible for an exit survey. Of the survey respondents, 76% (73/96) found the tech packet helpful and 64% (62/96) actively used it during care. To support condition-specific text message check-in completion, we allowed for adaption of day and/or time of the text message with 31 participants changing the time they received check-ins and change in standard biometric settings with 13 physicians requesting personalized settings for participants. To respond to the second theme's challenges, tech visits or phone calls were made to demonstrate how to use a smartphone to connect or disconnect from the internet, to schedule video calls, or for condition-specific text message check-ins in a location with broadband/internet. CONCLUSIONS: Having structured stakeholder feedback mechanisms is key to identify challenges and solutions to digital care engagement. Creating flexible and scalable solutions to technology-related challenges will increase equity in accessing digital care and support more effective engagement of chronically ill populations in the use of these digital care tools. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03451630; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03451630.

Correction: Addressing Implementation Challenges to Digital Care Delivery for Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Stakeholder Feedback in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/23498.].

Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research.

Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver care management can reduce the burden of multiple chronic conditions. In addition, successfully creating meaningful, inclusive research requires actively engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of a study. This study integrates stakeholder engagement, using a large health plan in western Pennsylvania, to conduct a randomized controlled trial. Three care management strategies, High-Touch, High-Tech, and Usual Care, are compared for effectiveness among members with multiple chronic conditions. Care strategies are delivered via the Community Team, a multidisciplinary community-based team, offering in-person (High-Touch) and digital (High-Tech) care management in 14 counties across Pennsylvania. Participants are followed for 12months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care, while tracking administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Quality of life, care satisfaction, engagement in care, and service utilization will be compared using generalized mixed models. Additionally, semi-structured interviews are conducted for both participants and care managers over the course of the study to evaluate feasibility. This manuscript presents implementation strategies, while noting that the implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in a real-world setting requires rapid evaluation, redesign of workflow, and tailored approaches for success.