RESUMO
In this study, to reduce the use of cement and sand, porous feldspar with excellent economic efficiency was used as a substitute in the heat storage concrete layer. When porous feldspar and four other silicate minerals were used as substitute materials for sand in cement mortar, the specimen with the porous feldspar exhibited approximately 16-63% higher compressive strength, thereby exhibiting a higher reactivity with cement compared to the other minerals. To compensate for the reduction in strength owing to the decreased cement content, mechanical and chemical activation methods were employed. When the specific surface area of porous feldspar was increased, the unit weight was reduced by approximately 30% and the compressive strength was increased by up to 90%. In addition, the results of the thermal diffusion test confirmed that thermal diffusion increased owing to a reduction in the unit weight; the heat storage characteristics improved owing to the better porosity of feldspar. When chemical activation was performed after reducing the cement content by 5% and replacing the sand with porous feldspar, the compressive strength was found to be approximately twice that of an ordinary cement mortar. In a large-scale model experiment, the heat storage layer containing the porous feldspar exhibited better heat conduction and heat storage characteristics than the heat storage layer composed of ordinary cement mortar. Additionally, energy savings of 57% were observed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Seoul Metabolic Syndrome Management (SMESY) project, a metropolitan lifestyle intervention program aimed at decreasing the risk of metabolic syndrome to the residents of the city, has recently been implemented in 2011. METHODS: Our target population consisted of residents of Seoul who were 30-64 years old. Subjects visiting a Public Health Center were screened for five risk factors for metabolic syndrome and then divided into three groups according to the number of the risk factors: active counseling, for having more than three risk factors; motivational guide, for having one or two; and information support for having none. Members of the active counseling group, the main target of the project, were provided with monthly in-person counseling on health-related lifestyle choices, as well as a follow-up examination every 3 months during the 12-month program. RESULTS: In the active counseling group, subjects showed statistically significant improvements in all five risk factors and the average number of retained risk factors decreased from 3.5 to 2.7. However, the percentage of active counseling group members who attended at least 3 out of the 4 sessions provided was only 11.3%. As for the motivational guide group and the information support group, clinically significant improvements were not observed and the percentage of members who attended all sessions were 10.4% and 11.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increased public participation for the ongoing project is expected to lead to great positive changes in the health of people with metabolic syndrome.
