Assessment of the cardiovascular safety of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of 20 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: It is important to establish the cardiovascular (CV) safety profile of novel antidiabetic drugs. METHODS: Pooled analyses were performed of 20 randomized controlled studies (N = 9156) of saxagliptin as monotherapy or add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as a subset of 11 saxagliptin + metformin studies. Adjudicated major adverse CV events (MACE; CV death, myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke) and investigator-reported heart failure were assessed, and incidence rates (IRs; events/100 patient-years) and IR ratios (IRRs; saxagliptin/control) were calculated (Mantel-Haenszel method). RESULTS: In pooled datasets, the IR point estimates for MACE and individual components of CV death, MI, and stroke favored saxagliptin, but the 95% CI included 1. IRR (95% CI) for MACE in the 20-study pool was 0.74 (0.45, 1.25). The Cox proportional hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.75 (0.46, 1.21), suggesting no increased risk of MACE in the 20-study pool. In the 11-study saxagliptin + metformin pool, the IRR for MACE was 0.93 (0.44, 1.99). In the 20-study pool, the IRR for heart failure was 0.55 (0.27, 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of pooled data from 20 clinical trials in patients with T2DM suggests that saxagliptin is not associated with an increased CV risk.

Safety of saxagliptin: events of special interest in 9156 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: A post hoc pooled analysis was undertaken to evaluate the safety of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with attention to events of special interest for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. METHODS: Pooled analyses were performed for 20 randomized controlled studies (N = 9156) of saxagliptin as monotherapy or add-on therapy, and a subset of 11 saxagliptin + metformin studies. Adverse events and events of special interest (gastrointestinal adverse events, infections, hypersensitivity, pancreatitis, skin lesions, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypoglycaemia, bone fracture, severe cutaneous adverse reactions, opportunistic infection, angioedema, malignancy, worsening renal function, and specific laboratory events) were assessed; incidence rates (events/100 person-years) and incidence rates ratios (saxagliptin/control) were calculated (Mantel-Haenszel method). RESULTS: In both pooled datasets, the incidence rates for deaths, serious adverse events, discontinuations due to adverse events, pancreatitis, malignancy, and most other events of special interest, excepting bone fractures and hypersensitivity, were similar between treatments, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incidence rates ratios including 1. In the 20-study pool, the incidence rates per 100 person-years was higher with saxagliptin versus control for bone fractures [1.1 vs 0.6; incidence rates ratio (95% CI), 1.81 (1.04-3.28)] and hypersensitivity adverse events [1.3 vs 0.8; 1.67 (1.01-2.87)]. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled data from 20 studies confirm that saxagliptin has a favourable safety and benefit-risk profile.

The antiretrovirals in pregnancy registry: a fifteenth anniversary celebration.

UNLABELLED: The year 2007 marks the fifteenth anniversary year of the founding of a landmark effort in drug safety risk management, the formation of the first monitoring effort of an antiretroviral (ARV) drug in pregnancy which has become the Antiretrovirals in Pregnancy Registry, the APR. This multicompany, multi-national voluntary collaborative registry monitors pregnancy exposure to a class of highly important drugs for any indication of an increase in the postexposure incidence of birth defects in the offspring of these pregnancies. To recognize the anniversary, the Steering Committee of the APR has commissioned this review of the contributions and lessons learned over the past decade and a half and, in the spirit of continuous process improvement, has committed to apply these lessons for the next fifteen years. This retrospective examines the antecedents to this registry and the context in which the APR was formed; the early efforts to establish technical and organizational procedures and policies; the evolving experiences with enrollment and follow-up, patient and participant protections, information management and oversight; public and regulatory dissemination; and of course, the accomplishments and lessons learned. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to explain the value of a drug registry in determining safety risk management; summarize that the Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs in Pregnancy Registry (APR) is a very successful multinational, multicompany collaborative effort that has been in place for 15 years; and state that it has been an ideal public interest effort dealing with the devastating pandemic of human immunodeficiency viral disease.