Surgical opioid-avoidance protocol: a postoperative pharmacological multimodal analgesic intervention in diverse patient populations.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effect of a surgical opioid-avoidance protocol (SOAP) on postoperative pain scores. The primary goal was to demonstrate that the SOAP was as effective as the pre-existing non-SOAP (without opioid restriction) protocol by measuring postoperative pain in a diverse, opioid-naive patient population undergoing inpatient surgery across multiple surgical services. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was divided into SOAP and non-SOAP groups based on surgery date. The non-SOAP group had no opioid restrictions (n=382), while the SOAP group (n=449) used a rigorous, opioid-avoidance order set with patient and staff education regarding multimodal analgesia. A non-inferiority analysis assessed the SOAP impact on postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores in the SOAP group compared with the non-SOAP group were non-inferior (95% CI: -0.58, 0.10; non-inferiority margin=-1). The SOAP group consumed fewer postoperative opioids (median=0.67 (IQR=15) vs 8.17 morphine milliequivalents (MMEs) (IQR=40.33); p<0.01) and had fewer discharge prescription opioids (median=0 (IQR=60) vs 86.4 MMEs (IQR=140.4); p<0.01). DISCUSSION: The SOAP was as effective as the non-SOAP group in postoperative pain scores across a diverse patient population and associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption and discharge prescription opioids.

A Prospective Multicenter Case Series Utilizing Intraoperative Neuromonitoring With Evoked Compound Action Potentials to Confirm Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Placement.

OBJECTIVES: The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been adapted to address issues of safety and proper lead positioning in spinal cord stimulation. This multicenter case series seeks to incorporate the use of evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and late response (LR) recording and compare it with the results obtained with IONM, specifically electromyography (EMG), for the confirmation of lead placement. This study aimed to establish a correlation between ECAPs, LR, and EMG and publish human recordings of ECAPs and LR during their use with IONM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard neuromonitoring protocols were followed at two institutions, with two separate physicians and with seven patients, as part of a larger ongoing study registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02924129). Stimulation and recording were performed, top and bottom, on each percutaneous lead. Stimulation amplitude was increased considering ECAP, LR, and EMG thresholds. RESULTS: ECAPs, LRs, and EMG signals were observed in all patients. The onset of LR signals on implanted electrodes and EMG signal on subdermal electrodes was well correlated (rs = 0.94, p < 0.001), with a median LR:EMG value of 1.06 (N = 21). LR:EMG for the top (mean = 0.97, N = 8) vs bottom (mean = 1.15, N = 13) of the lead was compared using a paired Wilcoxon signed rank test and an independent samples Mann-Whitney test, revealing a marginally significant and a statistically significant difference (p = 0.078 and p = 0.015, respectively). Mean LR:ECAP was >2 in all locations and approximately 3.5 overall. LR:ECAP between the top and bottom of the lead was significantly different (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.01, N = 12). CONCLUSIONS: LR correlated with EMG; leads with bilateral (not necessarily symmetric) EMG activity showed LR:ECAP > 1.5. An LR:ECAP of <1, with LR/EMG generated before the ECAP, indicated that the lead is too lateral. The use of ECAP and LR has the potential of maintaining objective lead placement, without the need for needle placement with IONM.

Electrophysiological Responses in the Human S3 Nerve During Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence.

Intra-operative electrode placement for sacral neuromodulation (SNM) relies on visual observation of motor contractions alone, lacking complete information on neural activation from stimulation. This study aimed to determine whether electrophysiological responses can be recorded directly from the S3 sacral nerve during therapeutic SNM in patients with fecal incontinence, and to characterize such responses in order to better understand the mechanism of action (MOA) and whether stimulation is subject to changes in posture. Eleven patients undergoing SNM were prospectively recruited. A bespoke stimulating and recording system was connected (both intraoperatively and postoperatively) to externalized SNM leads, and electrophysiological responses to monopolar current sweeps on each electrode were recorded and analyzed. The nature and thresholds of muscle contractions (intraoperatively) and patient-reported stimulation perception were recorded. We identified both neural responses (evoked compound action potentials) as well as myoelectric responses (far-field potentials from muscle activation). We identified large myelinated fibers (conduction velocity: 36-60 m/s) in 5/11 patients, correlating with patient-reported stimulation perception, and smaller myelinated fibers (conduction velocity <15 m/s) in 4/11 patients (not associated with any sensation). Myoelectric responses (observed in 7/11 patients) were attributed to pelvic floor and/or anal sphincter contraction. Responses varied with changes in posture. We present the first direct electrophysiological responses recorded from the S3 nerve during ongoing SNM in humans, showing both neural and myoelectric responses. These recordings highlight heterogeneity of neural and myoelectric responses (relevant to understanding MOA of SNM) and confirm that electrode lead position can change with posture.

The Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation Frequency on the Neural Response and Perceived Sensation in Patients With Chronic Pain.

BACKGROUND: The effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) amplitude on the activation of dorsal column fibres has been widely studied through the recording of Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs), the sum of all action potentials elicited by an electrical stimulus applied to the fibres. ECAP amplitude grows linearly with stimulus current after a threshold, and a larger ECAP results in a stronger stimulus sensation for patients. This study investigates the effect of stimulus frequency on both the ECAP amplitude as well as the perceived stimulus sensation in patients undergoing SCS therapy for chronic back and/or leg pain. METHODS: Patients suffering with chronic neuropathic lower-back and/or lower-limb pain undergoing an epidural SCS trial were recruited. Patients were implanted according to standard practice, having two 8-contact leads (8 mm inter-electrode spacing) which overlapped 2-4 contacts around the T9/T10 interspace. Both lead together thus spanning about three vertebral levels. Neurophysiological recordings were taken during the patient's trial phase at two routine follow-ups using a custom external stimulator capable of recording ECAPs in real-time from all non-stimulating contacts. Stimulation was performed at various vertebral levels, varying the frequency (ranging from 2 to 455 Hz) while all other stimulating variables were kept constant. During the experiments subjects were asked to rate the stimulation-induced sensation (paraesthesia) on a scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: Frequency response curves showed an inverse relationship between stimulation sensation strength and ECAP amplitude, with higher frequencies generating smaller ECAPs but stronger stimulation-induced paraesthesia (at constant stimulation amplitude). Both relationships followed logarithmic trends against stimulus frequency meaning that the effects on ECAP amplitude and sensation are larger for smaller frequencies. CONCLUSION: This work supports the hypothesis that SCS-induced paraesthesia is conveyed through both frequency coding and population coding, fitting known psychophysics of tactile sensory information processing. The inverse relationship between ECAP amplitude and sensation for increasing frequencies at fixed stimulus amplitude questions common assumptions of monotonic relationships between ECAP amplitude and sensation strength.

Evoked Compound Action Potentials Reveal Spinal Cord Dorsal Column Neuroanatomy.

INTRODUCTION: The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) is a measure of the response from a population of fibers to an electrical stimulus. ECAPs can be assessed during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to elucidate the relationship between stimulation, electrophysiological response, and neuromodulation. This has consequences for the design and programming of SCS devices. METHODS: Sheep were implanted with linear epidural SCS leads. After a stimulating pulse, electrodes recorded ECAPs sequentially as they propagated orthodromically or antidromically. After filtering, amplification, and signal processing, ECAP amplitude and dispersion (width) was measured, and conduction velocity was calculated. Similar clinical data was also collected. A single-neuron computer model that simulated large-diameter sensory axons was used to explore and explain the observations. RESULTS: ECAPs, both animal and human, have a triphasic structure, with P1, N1, and P2 peaks. Conduction velocity in sheep was 109 ms-1 , which indicates that the underlying neural population includes fibers of up to 20 µm in diameter. For travel in both directions, propagation distance was associated with decrease in amplitude and increase in dispersion. Importantly, characteristics of these changes shifted abruptly at various positions along the cord. DISCUSSION: ECAP dispersion increases with propagation distance due to the contribution of slow-conducting small-diameter fibers as the signal propagates away from the source. An analysis of the discontinuities in ECAP dispersion changes with propagation revealed that these are due to the termination of smaller-diameter, slower-conducting fibers at corresponding segmental levels. The implications regarding SCS lead placement, toward the goal of maximizing clinical benefit while minimizing side-effects, are discussed. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: John Parker is the founder and CEO of Saluda Medical and holds stock options. Milan Obradovic, Nastaran Hesam Shariati, Dean M. Karantonis, Peter Single, James Laird-Wah, Robert Gorman and Mark Bickerstaff are employees of Saluda Medical with stock options. At the time the data was collected for the study, Prof. Cousins was a paid consultant for Saluda Medical. John Parker, Milan Obradovic, Dean Karantonis, James Laird-Wah, Robert Gorman and Peter Single are co-inventors in one or more patents related to the topics discussed in this work.

A new biomarker for subthalamic deep brain stimulation for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease--a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the standard treatment for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) and other motor disorders. Although the surgical procedure has improved in accuracy over the years thanks to imaging and microelectrode recordings, the underlying principles that render DBS effective are still debated today. The aim of this paper is to present initial findings around a new biomarker that is capable of assessing the efficacy of DBS treatment for PD which could be used both as a research tool, as well as in the context of a closed-loop stimulator. APPROACH: We have used a novel multi-channel stimulator and recording device capable of measuring the response of nervous tissue to stimulation very close to the stimulus site with minimal latency, rejecting most of the stimulus artefact usually found with commercial devices. We have recorded and analyzed the responses obtained intraoperatively in two patients undergoing DBS surgery in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for advanced PD. MAIN RESULTS: We have identified a biomarker in the responses of the STN to DBS. The responses can be analyzed in two parts, an initial evoked compound action potential arising directly after the stimulus onset, and late responses (LRs), taking the form of positive peaks, that follow the initial response. We have observed a morphological change in the LRs coinciding with a decrease in the rigidity of the patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These initial results could lead to a better characterization of the DBS therapy, and the design of adaptive DBS algorithms that could significantly improve existing therapies and help us gain insights into the functioning of the basal ganglia and DBS.

Technology for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been in use for over 50 years to treat patients suffering from chronic pain who have failed conservative treatments. Despite this long history, the devices being used have changed very little. In fact, current PNS technology was developed specifically for spinal cord stimulation. The use of technology developed for other applications in PNS has led to an unnecessary number of device complications and the limited adoption of this promising therapy. The following chapter provides an overview of PNS technology throughout the years, outlining both the benefits and limitations. We will briefly explore the electrophysiology of PNS stimulation, with an emphasis on technology and indication-specific devices. Finally, design and technical requirements of an ideal PNS device will be discussed.

A model of evoked potentials in spinal cord stimulation.

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord is used for pain relief, and is in use for hundreds of thousands of cases of chronic neuropathic pain. In spinal cord stimulation (SCS), an array of electrodes is implanted in the epidural space of the cord, and electrical currents are used to stimulate nearby nerve fibers, believed to be in the dorsal columns of the cord. Despite the long history of SCS for pain, stretching over 30 years, its underlying mechanisms are poorly understood, and the therapy has evolved very little in this time. Recent work has resulted in the ability to record complex compound action potential waveforms during therapy. These waveforms reflect the neural activity evoked by the therapeutic stimulation, and reveal information about the underlying physiological processes. We aim to simulate these processes to the point of reproducing these recordings. We establish a hybrid model of SCS, composed of a three dimensional electrical model and a neural model. The 3D model describes the geometry of the spinal regions under consideration, and the electric fields that result from any flow of current within them. The neural model simulates the behaviour of spinal nerve fibers, which are the target tissues of the therapy. The combination of these two models is used to predict which fibers may be recruited by a given stimulus, as well as to predict the ensuing recorded waveforms. The model is shown to reproduce major features of spinal compound action potentials, such as threshold and propagation behaviour, which have been observed in experiments. The model's coverage of processes from stimulation to recording allows it to be compared side-by-side with actual experimental data, and will permit its refinement to a substantial level of accuracy.

Electrically evoked compound action potentials recorded from the sheep spinal cord.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to characterize the electrical response of dorsal column axons to depolarizing stimuli to help understand the mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the relief of chronic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recorded electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) during SCS in 10 anesthetized sheep using stimulating and recording electrodes on the same epidural SCS leads. A novel stimulating and recording system allowed artifact contamination of the ECAP to be minimized. RESULTS: The ECAP in the sheep spinal cord demonstrates a triphasic morphology, with P1, N1, and P2 peaks. The amplitude of the ECAP varies along the length of the spinal cord, with minimum amplitudes recorded from electrodes positioned over each intervertebral disc, and maximum amplitudes recorded in the midvertebral positions. This anatomically correlated depression of ECAP also correlates with the areas of the spinal cord with the highest thresholds for stimulation; thus regions of weakest response invariably had least sensitivity to stimulation by as much as a factor of two. The choice of stimulating electrode location can therefore have a profound effect on the power consumption for an implanted stimulator for SCS. There may be optimal positions for stimulation in the sheep, and this observation may translate to humans. Almost no change in conduction velocity (∼100 ms) was observed with increasing currents from threshold to twice threshold, despite increased Aß fiber recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Amplitude of sheep Aß fiber potentials during SCS exhibit dependence on electrode location, highlighting potential optimization of Aß recruitment and power consumption in SCS devices.

Compound action potentials recorded in the human spinal cord during neurostimulation for pain relief.

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord provides effective pain relief to hundreds of thousands of chronic neuropathic pain sufferers. The therapy involves implantation of an electrode array into the epidural space of the subject and then stimulation of the dorsal column with electrical pulses. The stimulation depolarises axons and generates propagating action potentials that interfere with the perception of pain. Despite the long-term clinical experience with spinal cord stimulation, the mechanism of action is not understood, and no direct evidence of the properties of neurons being stimulated has been presented. Here we report novel measurements of evoked compound action potentials from the spinal cords of patients undergoing stimulation for pain relief. The results reveal that Aß sensory nerve fibres are recruited at therapeutic stimulation levels and the Aß potential amplitude correlates with the degree of coverage of the painful area. Aß-evoked responses are not measurable below a threshold stimulation level, and their amplitude increases with increasing stimulation current. At high currents, additional late responses are observed. Our results contribute towards efforts to define the mechanism of spinal cord stimulation. The minimally invasive recording technique we have developed provides data previously obtained only through microelectrode techniques in spinal cords of animals. Our observations also allow the development of systems that use neuronal recording in a feedback loop to control neurostimulation on a continuous basis and deliver more effective pain relief. This is one of numerous benefits that in vivo electrophysiological recording can bring to a broad range of neuromodulation therapies.