Determination of the best electrode position for recording of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential.

To determine the optimal recording site for phrenic nerve conduction studies, six different recording techniques were compared in 11 healthy volunteers (22 phrenic nerves). The mean diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, side-to-side difference, and the number of studies with a false-positive result (CMAP amplitude <0.30 mV) were compared for each technique. The largest amplitude (0.65 +/- 0.23 mV, range 0.30-1.2 mV) with good right-left agreement (mean difference 0.15 mV) and no false positives was obtained using technique 1, where the G1 electrode was positioned 5 cm above the xiphoid process and G2 16 cm from G1 along the costal margin. This was also the easiest technique to perform. It does not require rib counting, which may be difficult and inaccurate, especially in overweight patients. At least one false positive occurred with each of the remaining five techniques.

Transient forearm conduction block in the median nerve.

We present two cases referred for electrophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Initial nerve conduction studies were normal. Approximately 20 min into the examination, both patients developed sensory symptoms and weakness in the distal median nerve territory while the elbow was extended and forearm supinated. Further studies demonstrated complete conduction block across the forearm in the median motor and sensory nerve fibers. When measurable, conduction velocities remained normal or were modestly slow. Complete clinical and electrophysiological recovery occurred within 2 min following forearm pronation, suggesting that dysfunction was probably due to focal transient ischemia. Patients describing increased sensory symptoms during routine electrophysiological assessments for CTS should be investigated to rule out the possibility of a more proximal abnormality.